↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

CellLineNavigator: a workbench for cancer cell line analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
CellLineNavigator: a workbench for cancer cell line analysis
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/nar/gks1012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Krupp, Timo Itzel, Thorsten Maass, Andreas Hildebrandt, Peter R. Galle, Andreas Teufel

Abstract

The CellLineNavigator database, freely available at http://www.medicalgenomics.org/celllinenavigator, is a web-based workbench for large scale comparisons of a large collection of diverse cell lines. It aims to support experimental design in the fields of genomics, systems biology and translational biomedical research. Currently, this compendium holds genome wide expression profiles of 317 different cancer cell lines, categorized into 57 different pathological states and 28 individual tissues. To enlarge the scope of CellLineNavigator, the database was furthermore closely linked to commonly used bioinformatics databases and knowledge repositories. To ensure easy data access and search ability, a simple data and an intuitive querying interface were implemented. It allows the user to explore and filter gene expression, focusing on pathological or physiological conditions. For a more complex search, the advanced query interface may be used to query for (i) differentially expressed genes; (ii) pathological or physiological conditions; or (iii) gene names or functional attributes, such as Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes pathway maps. These queries may also be combined. Finally, CellLineNavigator allows additional advanced analysis of differentially regulated genes by a direct link to the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) Bioinformatics Resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
India 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Computer Science 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,255,201
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#22,222
of 26,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,284
of 184,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#226
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.