RT @FilipPoscic: @ykuzyakov @boas_pucker MDPI is predatory, according to peer-reviewed evidence (https://t.co/DcpmgFEtxl). I was writing fo…
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Much #AcademicChatter this weekend about all 422 MDPI journals being classed as predatory This👇is worth a read Journa…
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Much #AcademicChatter this weekend about all 422 MDPI journals being classed as predatory This👇is worth a read Journa…
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Much #AcademicChatter this weekend about all 422 MDPI journals being classed as predatory This👇is worth a read Journa…
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Much #AcademicChatter this weekend about all 422 MDPI journals being classed as predatory This👇is worth a read Journa…
@ykuzyakov @boas_pucker MDPI is predatory, according to peer-reviewed evidence (https://t.co/DcpmgFEtxl). I was writing for years about the predatory character of MDPI and never accepted multiple requests to serve as a reviewer and "guest editor" for a num
The MDPI "special issue" scourge has moved from fish welfare into aquatic animal health. Stay away from their special issue "Biosecurity in Aquaculture: Balancing Sustainability and Disease Control" , and its $2000 USD publish fee https://t.co/lTfSvw6l2Q
@Jelipon86 @gueguenmicrobio @mart1oeil Même sans savoir l'auteur du site, les graphiques interrogent : l'autocitation, le fait d'envoyer des mails de spam... J'ai toujours entendu dire que c'était dans la zone gris donc autant "éviter si possible" La cont
RT @sarahRbakerDPH: Much #AcademicChatter this weekend about all 422 MDPI journals being classed as predatory This👇is worth a read Journa…
Much #AcademicChatter this weekend about all 422 MDPI journals being classed as predatory This👇is worth a read Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https
@K77Karel Tady je clanek o mdpi a to jestli vykazuje predatorstvi. The 53 MDPI-journals under analysis possess to a greater or lesser degree, some of the criteria for the identification of predatory journals and deviate from best editorial and publication
RT @stevensrehen: Não vejo futuro que não passe pelo reconhecimento de plataforma de preprint como repositório adequado do conhecimento ger…
RT @thuyvytnguyen: @EikoFried Profs in my phd program used to submit to Frontiers so I mistakenly recommended a collab to submit there once…
Não vejo futuro que não passe pelo reconhecimento de plataforma de preprint como repositório adequado do conhecimento gerado e revistas tradicionais remunerando profissionais para publicar revisões com críticas e comentários sobre os artigos compartilhados
@EikoFried Profs in my phd program used to submit to Frontiers so I mistakenly recommended a collab to submit there once b4 learning more ab their reputations. My impression is that MDPI has similar or even worse reputations. Esp this paper about their pra
Les journaux prédateurs qui se font des milliards sur le dos des chercheurs... (et avec de l'argent public) https://t.co/jSirPeqXlz
RT @pash22: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Instit…
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/l4Daxwt1ql via @maoviedogarcia
@jgschraiber @signor_molevol when we say that a publisher and/or a journal is predatory but some/all papers published by the same pub/jour are not - how do we deal with situations like that? are the pub getting way too smart or are we dumb not getting it!!
@DrBakhtiar_S @goetheuni @ub_ffm @DOAJplus Da scheint es im wesentlichen um einen Publisher zu gehen, der so eingeordnet wird (siehe https://t.co/Ut8U8UXkzQ). Es gibt allerdings auch Analysen die zu einem differenzierterem Ergebnis kommen (https://t.co/TKT
6. There is also an exponential increase of special issues in MDPI’s more than 400 journals, which is a questionable practice. Furthermore, the citation patterns of these journals single them out as predatory. https://t.co/FzyPIPFzhZ
RT @GuiWalther: @OchDr Absolutely yes ! Intersting point of view here : https://t.co/qBFx3AiPrB
@OchDr Absolutely yes ! Intersting point of view here : https://t.co/qBFx3AiPrB
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @emulenews: #ResearchEvaluation Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Di…
RT @emulenews: #ResearchEvaluation Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Di…
#ResearchEvaluation Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). The 53 MDPI journals ranked in the 2018 JCR are all singled out as predatory journals. https://t.
نعم المجلة لديها تحكيم لكنه أشبه بنظام يحتسب أهداف التسلل. النرويج والصين ضربتهما كمثال في حكمهما على المجلة. هذه دراسة علمية منشورة في مجلة تخصصية معتبرة حللت مجلات دار النشر MDPI https://t.co/2yxrfuL1FD
RT @ReidAlderson: @P__Zimmer This evaluation of MDPI from 2018-2020 might be of interest to you. Large increase in the # of special issues/…
RT @martin_kreidl: Journals published by MDPI are everywhere. But do we really want our disciplines to be connected to this unscrupulous ac…
RT @martin_kreidl: Journals published by MDPI are everywhere. But do we really want our disciplines to be connected to this unscrupulous ac…
@tom_b_elliot @MDPIOpenAccess Read this to better understand their business model. Do not contribute! https://t.co/7VcoSEXliR
Journals published by MDPI are everywhere. But do we really want our disciplines to be connected to this unscrupulous academic business? Read https://t.co/7VcoSEXliR
RT @ReidAlderson: @P__Zimmer This evaluation of MDPI from 2018-2020 might be of interest to you. Large increase in the # of special issues/…
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/EyT8TsfeGV
@P__Zimmer This evaluation of MDPI from 2018-2020 might be of interest to you. Large increase in the # of special issues/year. Some published SIs at a rate of > 1/week https://t.co/cPAsxUEc45
@Johnincarlisle @YouTube As a retired scientist, you should be aware of quality journals and pay way more attention to the quality of studies you quote. Not a well-respected journal to begin with. https://t.co/VJifMv8eKJ
A controversial and contested article about the MDPI practices that anyway deserves to be read Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/GEgIPaaje
RT @NicoleRPrause: @MioHondaFan The solitary "review" cited is not a review. It was by four anti-porn activists with no background in neur…
@MioHondaFan The solitary "review" cited is not a review. It was by four anti-porn activists with no background in neuroscience in a predatory journal. https://t.co/APLJRFFMIl
RT @a_peterman: @smartindc @TheSVRI @IJERPH_MDPI This amount is not unusual for an article open access charge, regardless of the topic [& s…
@smartindc @TheSVRI @IJERPH_MDPI This amount is not unusual for an article open access charge, regardless of the topic [& sometimes there are waivers for authors based at global south institutions] Nonetheless, some publishers [like MDPI] are known as
@SAOCousins @Dr_Oakleaf Agreed. Definitely!!!
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/dUA36xWOIO
@paquilloal A lo mejor este análisis te resulta más conveniente: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/LlP8Hz3MQ7
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
@FelixEkardt sorry, das war ein shortcut, vom fragwürdigen Verlagshaus MDPI (mit evtl. manipulierten IFs https://t.co/Igo0MDOMna) auf das Journal und auf den Artikel zu schließen. Aber eine turnaround-Zeit von nicht mal 2 Monaten für eine legal analysis de
Another example about #MDPI journals (very debatable) $tandard$. Have anyone ever seen a similar variation in annual numbers of an animal group at a given area?👇These results should have never been being published after REAL peer review process in a JCR in
RT @NBTiller: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐃𝐏𝐈? It has been criticized for low standards of peer review and high publication charges. Yet, MDPI…
as problematic as the concept is, this study shows quite clearly that 53 #MDPI journals do fall into criteria that are generally considered to be predatory. No surprises, just one suggestion: do not publish, edit or review for MDPI, you're gonna regret it
IMO, MDPI is a by-product of the "culture of speed" in academia. But I am glad that more researchers are now raising their concerns about it. P.S. I am not generalising, some MDPI journals have high standards and reputation.
RT @NBTiller: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐃𝐏𝐈? It has been criticized for low standards of peer review and high publication charges. Yet, MDPI…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @NBTiller: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐃𝐏𝐈? It has been criticized for low standards of peer review and high publication charges. Yet, MDPI…
I will leave this here for you
RT @NBTiller: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐃𝐏𝐈? It has been criticized for low standards of peer review and high publication charges. Yet, MDPI…
RT @Waheed_A_Bhatti: Journal #citation reports and the definition of a #predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publis…
Journal #citation reports and the definition of a #predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) | Research Evaluation | Oxford Academic #publication #businessaau https://t.co/2hYUngp0QU
RT @NBTiller: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐃𝐏𝐈? It has been criticized for low standards of peer review and high publication charges. Yet, MDPI…
RT @NBTiller: 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐃𝐏𝐈? It has been criticized for low standards of peer review and high publication charges. Yet, MDPI…
MDPI is the definition of predatory publishing. Their customer is the person paying the APC, not the scientific community.
𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭'𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐌𝐃𝐏𝐈? It has been criticized for low standards of peer review and high publication charges. Yet, MDPI vehemently refutes any link to #predatory #publishing. #academia 🔗https://t.co/ADMABsqcW1 🔗https://t.co/i7v0soWtyP https://t.co/le
@pash22 @andrewgregory @susan_bewley Hm? Published in "Cancers" (cf Wiley's "Cancer"). Publisher, MDPI, is predatory. https://t.co/eo5kJ5UdKQ
@kwapisz_adam @KaminskiTomas @wsmip W przypadki mdpi za kupnem artykułu idzie też kupno cytowań. Pewnie dotyczy to większości predatorów. https://t.co/JPda0Pm326
RT @CaulfieldTim: Researching topic of "locally grown food" for a section of my next book. 7/10 of the results on first page of a Google S…
RT @antoniojcastro: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishin…
RT @DanielJDrucker: Congratulations! @RetractionWatch https://t.co/RXYaIOrcFm https://t.co/73SHe1JbSA
RT @DanielJDrucker: Congratulations! @RetractionWatch https://t.co/RXYaIOrcFm https://t.co/73SHe1JbSA
RT @DanielJDrucker: Congratulations! @RetractionWatch https://t.co/RXYaIOrcFm https://t.co/73SHe1JbSA
RT @DanielJDrucker: Congratulations! @RetractionWatch https://t.co/RXYaIOrcFm https://t.co/73SHe1JbSA
RT @DanielJDrucker: Congratulations! @RetractionWatch https://t.co/RXYaIOrcFm https://t.co/73SHe1JbSA
Congratulations! @RetractionWatch https://t.co/RXYaIOrcFm https://t.co/73SHe1JbSA
@HexVlogger @DrAseemMalhotra It's also worth noting that the publisher of this journal, MDPI, has strong signs of being predatory, which in a nutshell means they'll publish anything if you give them enough money. The typos are another sign of predatory jou
RT @antoniojcastro: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishin…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Researching topic of "locally grown food" for a section of my next book. 7/10 of the results on first page of a Google S…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Researching topic of "locally grown food" for a section of my next book. 7/10 of the results on first page of a Google S…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Researching topic of "locally grown food" for a section of my next book. 7/10 of the results on first page of a Google S…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Researching topic of "locally grown food" for a section of my next book. 7/10 of the results on first page of a Google S…
RT @CaulfieldTim: Researching topic of "locally grown food" for a section of my next book. 7/10 of the results on first page of a Google S…
Researching topic of "locally grown food" for a section of my next book. 7/10 of the results on first page of a Google Scholar search were for predatory or (seriously) iffy publications! Damn, the literature SO polluted. Good analysis of one publisher:
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
@DeodatoPianobar @barriere_dr en plus technique tu as : https://t.co/JWErn3nVB1 et https://t.co/jYLhLtxI7y
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
RT @rahmstorf: @PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Rev…
@HolzheuStefan Genau.
@PLengsfeld @susannegoetze @AnnikaJoeres @relookclimate Nicht alle Fachjournale sind seriös und machen ordentlichen Peer Review. Manche wollen einfach nur Geld machen; dort publizieren Klimaleugner etc. gerne unhaltbaren Unsinn, um damit Laien zu beeindruc
RT @FrederikSchenk: @ronin_sam @RUSLengineering @PLengsfeld @AndreThess Ich hatte zu einer vorherigen Publikation zu einem Thema in meinem…
@ronin_sam @RUSLengineering @PLengsfeld @AndreThess Ich hatte zu einer vorherigen Publikation zu einem Thema in meinem Fachbereich (Paläoklima) schon versucht, mit ihm über das Paper zu sprechen. Er hat sich geweigert, inhaltlich zu antworten. Später hat e
@dusty_dweller @RepThomasMassie @rgvrunner01 You people are so gullible https://t.co/RbxKuTd9A0