RT @ResearchingP: دراسة حللت مجلات دار النشر السويسري MDPI خلصت بنصيحةللباحثين أن لا يتعاملوا مع المجلات كمؤلفين أو محكمين أو محررين، وأن ل…
RT @ResearchingP: دراسة حللت مجلات دار النشر السويسري MDPI خلصت بنصيحةللباحثين أن لا يتعاملوا مع المجلات كمؤلفين أو محكمين أو محررين، وأن ل…
دراسة حللت مجلات دار النشر السويسري MDPI خلصت بنصيحةللباحثين أن لا يتعاملوا مع المجلات كمؤلفين أو محكمين أو محررين، وأن لا يستشهدوا ببحوث هذه المجلات. للعلم ان هذه الدار تتقاضى رسوم نشر عالية وسريعة النشر، مع أن لديها مجلات مفهرسة في شبكة العلوم WoS(ISI) h
Echoing all of this from Laura. Same experience on my end.
On the occasion of being asked to review for an @MDPIOpenAccess journal, a reminder that they're predatory! https://t.co/uboH3JlhZx
RT @FabianFassnach1: Very interesting article on #mdpi : https://t.co/nhwhJxWyfj I feel very much assured in my decision 1 or 2 years ago t…
@IjeomaOparaPHD @DonteBoyd7 I’m so happy to see Black people get their shine but IJERPH and MDPI are on the very predatory end of legitimate journals https://t.co/qVt3iijIV6
@querdenkenwatch Auch interessant, wo die Studie veröffentlicht wurde (MDPI). Das ist ein Journal wo der Autor bezahlen muss um veröffentlicht zu werden. Entsprechend kann man die Frage stellen ob das so gut peer-reviewed wurde... https://t.co/hFQmS6ADwq
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
@ProfPHansen There are many good paper in their journals but MDPI in general seems predatory to me: most articles are reviews; many through ‘special issues’; and many journals have quick turn-around time; my own experiences with their editorial process was
@25_cycle @Rebecca74083947 MDPI is somewhat suspicious as a journal publisher https://t.co/nxCEHmybH0
@Rebecca74083947 MDPI pops up here as suspicious https://t.co/nxCEHmyJwy
Mdpi ini masih pro cons ya, tapi akupun sejujurnya kurang bangga meskipun kemaren publish q1nya mdpi, while dulu seneng banget publish di q3nya Springerlink yg submit sampai publishnya gratissss
RT @najib_lipi: Bbrp kajian menarik ttg MDPI: 1. "Journal citation reports & the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the MDPI",…
pas liat jurnalnya, oh tentu saja ada sustainability wkkw
RT @najib_lipi: Bbrp kajian menarik ttg MDPI: 1. "Journal citation reports & the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the MDPI",…
TIL. Tapi nggak kaget sih😅
RT @najib_lipi: Bbrp kajian menarik ttg MDPI: 1. "Journal citation reports & the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the MDPI",…
RT @najib_lipi: Bbrp kajian menarik ttg MDPI: 1. "Journal citation reports & the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the MDPI",…
@EasySimon @JustMe123____ @TeslaBull8 @ChrisOl31544283 @TwHandle @PeterSweden7 Hmmm MDPI again… here’s a link to predatory journals. https://t.co/EuLjbLEByi
Bbrp kajian menarik ttg MDPI: 1. "Journal citation reports & the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the MDPI", https://t.co/o3pJmJcCgj 2. "MDPI’s Remarkable Growth", https://t.co/qiA2mXZ5hM 3. "Is MDPI a predatory publisher?", https://t.co
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @RetractionWatch: "Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publish…
@Navaraaa Ils étaient déjà pas mal dans la "zone grise" auparavant, mais depuis qq années ils sont très critiqués pour leur politique agressive, qui les range du côté des éditeurs "prédateurs" : https://t.co/arU1FK5zQL https://t.co/Osf4fKjrCv
ちなみに関わってはいけなそうと判断した理由はこの論文でhttps://t.co/JbFH4sRuBn 雑誌名たびたび目にしていた上に、直近なんかやたら論文の本数を重視してそうなツイートしてる人のCVに入ってたから意地悪な気持ちでつい調べてしまった
RT @lukar_t: Analysis of MDPI "the low variability of timeframes for peer review regardless of the scope of the journal, the size of its ed…
RT @BenoitNabholz: @joris_bertrand @GaltierNicolas Joris, il ne fait plus aucun doute qu'MDPI n'est pas un éditeur. Regarde par exemple : h…
@joris_bertrand @GaltierNicolas Joris, il ne fait plus aucun doute qu'MDPI n'est pas un éditeur. Regarde par exemple : https://t.co/kkm9VbCGQD et https://t.co/i2kOtU0sdS Il faut arrêter de supporter ces entreprises qui prennent l'argent public car, in fin
Interesting reading regarding predatory journals and how to spot them. https://t.co/tXSoqUXxOP
There's a very detailed study on MDPI here. The author reports that in their sample, MDPI journals had an average of 113 special issues per year and one journal has an editorial board with 1145 members (!!) https://t.co/239xh6K02L 3/
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
@zehrataskin mdpi!!!, 1400 Swiss Francs, umarım ''Sustainability'' gibi değildir. https://t.co/Fq6OZJInAe
What do you understand from this paragraph? That there exists a limit to the number of editorial board members that can be from developing countries otherwise the journal is considered predatory? (For context, the article I'm reading is this one: https://t
@KWhiteheadLab Have 2 papers in MDPI Polymers & Pharmaceutics. 1st time had no clue about MDPI, 2nd forgot :). No regrets & put same amount of work as always. Reviewers’ rigor not much different from that of like Wiley journals. Open access cost is
@kl13c Is it an MDPI journal? They once asked me for a one week turnaround. I did it and then they published the article without addressing any of my many concerns. They don't seem to take review very seriously. https://t.co/W8Gozp4kZE
RT @antoniojcastro: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishin…
@KirstenJungLab1 I would be careful with @MDPIOpenAccess The very short time from submission to publication of all three papers in the special issue supports my scepticism! Also have personal experience! See this paper: https://t.co/iwh79FSPMf
RT @antoniojcastro: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishin…
RT @RetractionWatch: “Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publish…
@PiotrStec2 @Maciej76718052 @KaminskiTomas @MilekPl To już nie chodzi nawet o to, żeby pisma z MDPI usunąć np. z wykazu czas. punktowanych; niech zostaną, ale trzeba im przypisać liczbę punktów mniej więcej odpow. ich pozycji w nauce światowej, a ta jest n
@PiotrStec2 @Maciej76718052 @MilekPl No mamy też badania analizujące MDPI jako drapieżniki. I zdrowy rozsądek żeby wiedzieć, że jak wydajesz średnio dwa numery dziennie to nie możesz zapewnić jakości. Nawet Gazeta Wyborcza wychodzi rzadziej :) https://t.co
@MilekPl @Maciej76718052 Nie musimy używać argumentu „autorytetu” i licytować się na dorobek, bo jest całkiem sporo badań naukowych na temat MDPI np. https://t.co/Xjc8F68Zbk
RT @liptovszky: @amores_wildlife Unfortunately, and despite many good articles in Animals, MDPI’s practices are definitely meeting predator…
@amores_wildlife Unfortunately, and despite many good articles in Animals, MDPI’s practices are definitely meeting predatory criteria. Also here https://t.co/FgVr05cMcg I stopped opening their emails some time ago for this reason ☹️
RT @ibackalov: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Ins…
@brembs @PHuenermund @michael_gerloff @MinskyMouse Hier mal eine spannende Studie bezüglich MDPI: https://t.co/Qgvh5OTUl8 Aber das kennen Sie sicherlich.
An important read.. Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/VfYmPXYnLq
RT @antoniojcastro: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishin…
@JakubPoplawski @PanRafalSlucha @ForumAkad Dziękuję za link do Nature Communication (https://t.co/iizC4D8RNy). Jeśli to możliwe, proszę o więcej linków do renomowanych w skali międzynarodowej pism działających wg modelu MDPI. Przy okazji polecam art.: http
"The alarming increase in the number of predatory journals (from 1,800 to 8,000 over the period 2010–4) and the exponential growth (from 53,000 to 420,000 between 2010 and 2014) of the articles that they publish (Shen and Bjork 2015) ..." Wow.
A '21 analysis of a sample of MDPI journals concludes: "These results showed that the MDPI-journals... generally fitted the definition of predatory journals." https://t.co/CI3tIj6cyG There is evidence that MDPI generally rushes the review process, favors q
@PolonenJanne Löysin muuten kiinnostavan tutkimuksen juuri tästä julkaisijasta: https://t.co/fBMrObJbDv
... and an article about the publisher MDPI: "... formal criteria together with the analysis of the citation patterns of the 53 journals under analysis all singled them out as predatory journals" https://t.co/SQBDl1ShG4
@watermicrobe I didn't include the publisher, bc I wanted to discuss the question unbiased. The journal is MDPI, which has already not the best reputation ... https://t.co/SQBDl1ShG4
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
Here's even more data about the outstanding rates of self-citation (and intra-MDPI citation), special issues, initial decisions, etc. at MDPI journals compared to the best journals (per category): https://t.co/HptT56qErj
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) cc: @stradijanizam @ASoutoIglesias @nikola_boka @a2NavArc @boatleigh https://t.co/VjE2gXdiWR
RT @EvolvingVir: Is MDPI a predatory journal ?, It seems it's not a black and gray question. Yes, as answer: https://t.co/IjSV7TUJYv No, a…
Just read an interesting paper on citation practices at @MDPIOpenAccess journals. Publisher was long on the list of #predatory #journals & many practices are still, well, dubious. https://t.co/3SSdKoe3LL #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #AcademicPubli
To the best of the author’s knowledge, the study of a dubious publisher, such as MDPI has not been approached, except on rare occasions. MDPI was on Beall’s list until its appeal and it has been downgraded and then upgraded by the NSD. https://t.co/ogsYylg
RT @takaoasano: この論文を共同研究者に紹介したら、この論文を批判する論文を教えてもらった。MDPIについての議論はつきそうにない。 https://t.co/4mXRCqghsq
RT @takaoasano: この論文を共同研究者に紹介したら、この論文を批判する論文を教えてもらった。MDPIについての議論はつきそうにない。 https://t.co/4mXRCqghsq
RT @takaoasano: この論文を共同研究者に紹介したら、この論文を批判する論文を教えてもらった。MDPIについての議論はつきそうにない。 https://t.co/4mXRCqghsq
RT @takaoasano: この論文を共同研究者に紹介したら、この論文を批判する論文を教えてもらった。MDPIについての議論はつきそうにない。 https://t.co/4mXRCqghsq
RT @takaoasano: この論文を共同研究者に紹介したら、この論文を批判する論文を教えてもらった。MDPIについての議論はつきそうにない。 https://t.co/4mXRCqghsq
RT @takaoasano: この論文を共同研究者に紹介したら、この論文を批判する論文を教えてもらった。MDPIについての議論はつきそうにない。 https://t.co/4mXRCqghsq
この論文を共同研究者に紹介したら、この論文を批判する論文を教えてもらった。MDPIについての議論はつきそうにない。 https://t.co/4mXRCqghsq
Besides, an increasingly high rate of citations from other MDPI-journals was observed. The formal criteria together with the analysis of the citation patterns of the 53 journals under analysis all singled them out as predatory journals. #mdpi #predatory ht
The extent to which predatory journals can harm scientific practice increases as the numbers of such journals expand, in so far as they undermine scientific integrity, quality, and credibility, especially if those journals leak into prestigious databases🔥
RT @KatoMasat: MDPIの粗悪さを検証した論文。 「これらの雑誌はすべて略奪的な雑誌であると判断された。したがって、研究者、教育機関、一流のデータベースに対して、こうした種類の学術雑誌との関係を見直すよう、具体的な勧告がなされている。」 とのこと。 https:/…
RT @KatoMasat: MDPIの粗悪さを検証した論文。 「これらの雑誌はすべて略奪的な雑誌であると判断された。したがって、研究者、教育機関、一流のデータベースに対して、こうした種類の学術雑誌との関係を見直すよう、具体的な勧告がなされている。」 とのこと。 https:/…
RT @KatoMasat: MDPIの粗悪さを検証した論文。 「これらの雑誌はすべて略奪的な雑誌であると判断された。したがって、研究者、教育機関、一流のデータベースに対して、こうした種類の学術雑誌との関係を見直すよう、具体的な勧告がなされている。」 とのこと。 https:/…
MDPIの粗悪さを検証した論文。 「これらの雑誌はすべて略奪的な雑誌であると判断された。したがって、研究者、教育機関、一流のデータベースに対して、こうした種類の学術雑誌との関係を見直すよう、具体的な勧告がなされている。」 とのこと。 https://t.co/OtlvIpr4I5
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/GvNGdEl4b5 SHOTS. FIRED.
RT @EvolvingVir: Is MDPI a predatory journal ?, It seems it's not a black and gray question. Yes, as answer: https://t.co/IjSV7TUJYv No, a…
Is MDPI a predatory journal ?, It seems it's not a black and gray question. Yes, as answer: https://t.co/IjSV7TUJYv No, as answer: https://t.co/juju6A60P2 https://t.co/sGKQ2rnWKm
@FrantisekStaud @DanNett1980 @Negar_1989 @OdedRechavi No, I will not make that claim, but there is some evidence based on some MDPI journals within and across journal citation rates than are higher than expected. Someone above linked an analysis (shared ag
Klimaleugner Sebastian und Philipp (wer kennt sie nicht) haben in einem Raubjournal (https://t.co/bqolZCbjk7, https://t.co/hUBWkYIStz) was publiziert: "How Reliable Are Global Temperature Reconstructions of the Common Era?" https://t.co/CIIEHIHxJS Das Bild
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) https://t.co/T4jCvMibd7
Hey, do we have a consensus about MDPI and whether it's predatory and to be avoided? I'm finding this article pretty convincing but am interested to hear other perspectives! https://t.co/qjCe3kfZcn
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @danbrockington: Here' an important new article about #MDPI journals. Makes me think we need a better terminology for talking about the…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
@TaoGao2020 @L2ES_Liu @CabanaChemistry @SchaeferLab Two different perspectives on mdpi journals https://t.co/NOeaY4K1iU https://t.co/ltm1kzVpdJ
RT @antoniojcastro: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishin…
RT @antoniojcastro: Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishin…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
RT @PlieningerLab: Interesting analysis of MDPI as a "hidden predatory publisher". Conclusion: "Researchers should neither send papers for…
@sMarten_Winter Noo! MDPI is predatory. They started out ok, but have developed into scum. Here´s one analysis: https://t.co/rIMhMVCr5Q
@marco_heffler Inoltre l'editore MDPI non e' proprio un arassicurazione https://t.co/uW0qRycrHr