↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Article Metrics

Embed badge What is this page?

A systematic review of the validated monogenic causes of human male infertility: 2020 update and a discussion of emerging gene–disease relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Human Reproduction Update, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary News Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
Title
A systematic review of the validated monogenic causes of human male infertility: 2020 update and a discussion of emerging gene–disease relationships
Published in
Human Reproduction Update, September 2021
DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmab030
Pubmed ID
34498060
Authors

Brendan J Houston, Antoni Riera-Escamilla, Margot J Wyrwoll, Albert Salas-Huetos, Miguel J Xavier, Liina Nagirnaja, Corinna Friedrich, Don F Conrad, Kenneth I Aston, Csilla Krausz, Frank Tüttelmann, Moira K O’Bryan, Joris A Veltman, Manon S Oud

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 48 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 55 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,041,598
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction Update
#90
of 1,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,404
of 430,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction Update
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Oxford University Press.