| Title |
A systematic review of the validated monogenic causes of human male infertility: 2020 update and a discussion of emerging gene–disease relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Reproduction Update, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/humupd/dmab030 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brendan J Houston, Antoni Riera-Escamilla, Margot J Wyrwoll, Albert Salas-Huetos, Miguel J Xavier, Liina Nagirnaja, Corinna Friedrich, Don F Conrad, Kenneth I Aston, Csilla Krausz, Frank Tüttelmann, Moira K O’Bryan, Joris A Veltman, Manon S Oud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,212,350
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction Update
#110
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,247
of 436,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction Update
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.