| Title |
Valuing the Diversity of Research Methods to Advance Nutrition Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Nutrition, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1093/advances/nmac043 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard D Mattes, Sylvia B Rowe, Sarah D Ohlhorst, Andrew W Brown, Daniel J Hoffman, DeAnn J Liska, Edith J M Feskens, Jaapna Dhillon, Katherine L Tucker, Leonard H Epstein, Lynnette M Neufeld, Michael Kelley, Naomi K Fukagawa, Roger A Sunde, Steven H Zeisel, Anthony J Basile, Laura E Borth, Emahlea Jackson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 17 | 7% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 154 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 160 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#927,126
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Nutrition
#343
of 1,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,835
of 439,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Nutrition
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.