Title |
Long-Term Studies Contribute Disproportionately to Ecology and Policy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioScience, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biw185 |
Authors |
Brent B. Hughes, Rodrigo Beas-Luna, Allison K. Barner, Kimberly Brewitt, Daniel R. Brumbaugh, Elizabeth B. Cerny-Chipman, Sarah L. Close, Kyle E. Coblentz, Kristin L. de Nesnera, Sarah T. Drobnitch, Jared D. Figurski, Becky Focht, Maya Friedman, Jan Freiwald, Kristen K. Heady, Walter N. Heady, Annaliese Hettinger, Angela Johnson, Kendra A. Karr, Brenna Mahoney, Monica M. Moritsch, Ann-Marie K. Osterback, Jessica Reimer, Jonathan Robinson, Tully Rohrer, Jeremy M. Rose, Megan Sabal, Leah M. Segui, Chenchen Shen, Jenna Sullivan, Rachel Zuercher, Peter T. Raimondi, Bruce A. Menge, Kirsten Grorud-Colvert, Mark Novak, Mark H. Carr |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 93 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 53 | 14% |
Canada | 34 | 9% |
Australia | 17 | 4% |
Finland | 11 | 3% |
Germany | 7 | 2% |
Ireland | 6 | 2% |
Spain | 5 | 1% |
Portugal | 3 | <1% |
Other | 37 | 9% |
Unknown | 124 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 216 | 55% |
Scientists | 162 | 42% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Mexico | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 373 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 79 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 20% |
Student > Master | 53 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 4% |
Other | 54 | 14% |
Unknown | 71 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 153 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 110 | 29% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 4% |
Unknown | 81 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 321. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#98,301
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#44
of 3,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,452
of 316,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.