| Title |
Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Reproduction Update, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1093/humupd/dmx022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hagai Levine, Niels Jørgensen, Anderson Martino-Andrade, Jaime Mendiola, Dan Weksler-Derri, Irina Mindlis, Rachel Pinotti, Shanna H. Swan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 868 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 117 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 5% |
| Canada | 21 | 2% |
| Japan | 20 | 2% |
| Turkey | 19 | 2% |
| Kenya | 17 | 2% |
| France | 14 | 2% |
| Australia | 13 | 1% |
| Spain | 13 | 1% |
| Other | 115 | 13% |
| Unknown | 479 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 736 | 85% |
| Scientists | 59 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 49 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 22 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 161 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 131 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 12% |
| Researcher | 116 | 10% |
| Other | 55 | 5% |
| Other | 190 | 17% |
| Unknown | 328 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 219 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 128 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 185 | 17% |
| Unknown | 394 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6326. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#512
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction Update
#1
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3
of 328,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction Update
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.