@Alyssa3467 @GCITC2 @Gegenbeispiel @Gender_WooWoo @unisontheunion @RebeccaRHelm @ForrestValkai https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5

@Tushar001Singh @hfoster505 @HarlotPrincessx @CAISFiles @XO83766320 @Iamthisnotthat1 @RaeUK @IntersexTruther @KatieInBoston1 @DaysGoByGoBy Lovely. Here's the science for you. Enjoy. https://t.co/J3v8PTcLOe https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs https://t.co/NkgB2wGksK

@ravielie @drdredel @hiimargo This is a very good paper which describes why two discrete papers have evolves - and only two sexes. What have these biologists got wrong in your opinion? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@WatcherWoe @HandOfTheDark @AnnabelTheRose @chadfelixg A sex is an evolved reproductive role associate with one of the two gamete types. The gamete types evolved divergently and do not overlap. This is the source of their being two sexes, e.g. see… https:

@j3lkz @Jtm0401 @Aizensama1987 @EminaMelonic @JustinFolk @MattWalshBlog @realDailyWire @davereaboi What have these biologists got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@nytelife26 @DeliaArribas @Frollino95 @Gender_WooWoo @brain_gilgamesh @BachtoBach2 @keffals Woman = adult female human Man = adult male human As for the definition of the male and female sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMVzzO

@CloudVolumesGuy @SeethiFC @cacheblaster @aofl96 @everydayangst1 @david55034076 @jasonintrator Your question contains a confusion, which I can address shortly. But first, here is a paper that explains why two and only two sexes have evolved and why it ha

@colincidence Read this instead https://t.co/P5YQ9bq9q4

RT @lecanardnoir: @scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @qsilverfox @GCBeeGee @iseult @Dervheid I am not aware of you actually defining what a…

@scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @qsilverfox @GCBeeGee @iseult @Dervheid I am not aware of you actually defining what a sex is yet. And nor have you said what is wrong with these biologists definitions and explanations as to why only to have evolved. ht

RT @lecanardnoir: @scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @IBrasso @Dervheid This is an interesting paper on why two - and only two - sexes have…

@scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @IBrasso @Dervheid This is an interesting paper on why two - and only two - sexes have evolved. Are they wrong? Have more sexes evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@WhoKnowsAnymre @jasonintrator What is sex https://t.co/P5YQ9bHKhC

@rkellchicago @mcguinnessfortx @shawnravenfire @APFactCheck Here, on the other hand, is just one of many making the opposite case. Bet you don't read it, though... https://t.co/GLuHxHxB3O

@Hanky__Spam @Kitab_al_Azif So wie .@NeuroStaggy zusammenstellt zum Beispiel: https://t.co/R4RSQZe9PS Oder sowas: https://t.co/tIok8sFrLb

@Minastet @TheCatFromMars @juliablough @WorldOfOrdinary @jasonintrator You make claims about someone else’s medical stability because they pointed out males and females are biologically different. Your comment. Then when challenged on this argue that’s not

https://t.co/agA0rimjEq

@xk992x @STEVEN_HALL_bTC @MrThou6 @GhostGcom I just have. We can look at the peer reviewed biology to back up what I say. As you can see here, this paper shows *why* only two sexes have evolved (it is very evolutionary stable) and that male and female are

@61harpy @LisaPatrEvans @setoacnna @glosswitch Sex is based on biology. https://t.co/P5YQ9bq9q4

@61harpy @setoacnna @glosswitch No, I’m talking about biology. You really are making stuff up. https://t.co/P5YQ9bq9q4

Here’s an interesting read https://t.co/bmZdesJ4u6

RT @zaelefty: This evolutionary biology paper on the evolution of two sexes, by Lehtonen & Parker, is the gold standard for explaining why…

RT @EdwinDroom: @limertilly @ncaipics @DanniBrener @diannaeanderson https://t.co/tCVbi6sv0A

@limertilly @ncaipics @DanniBrener @diannaeanderson https://t.co/tCVbi6sv0A

@LoMama81 @MaudMaron https://t.co/9goY1QrSga

@Yes_Im_Maya @HairyEnthusiasm @JamieWorkentin @Zoe_Vexed @JudeWTH It’s based on developmental pathway. Male or female. https://t.co/5jBPZn9evV

@Blow_The_Trap Was it this point? https://t.co/Y85ds5szAi In that case, here is a paper describing why two and only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@JustinFREAKINS My sources are the peer reviewed research literature on the evolution of sex. You refuse to engage with the literature when asked if you think the biologists are wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@JustinFREAKINS Do you think these biologist are wrong that only two sexes have evolved based on the two different gamete types? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@JustinFREAKINS Do you disagree with these biologists that only two sexes have evolved based on the two gamete types? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

Gamete is the new idiot buzz word.

@JustinFREAKINS Sex is defined with respect to gamete types. It is discrete. This is foundational biology. To argue anything else requires some very explicit argument. You cannto show this. Here is just one paper that explains why only two sexes have evo

@KaylinStuff @TheRavey @FondOfBeetles Could you please link me to some of these papers? Biological study demonstrates the firm binary nature of sex. https://t.co/b6Ip6hFpC0 https://t.co/J3v8PTdjDM

@brigadam @CashNBlood2025 @MsBlaireWhite Humans reproduce through anisogamy which is the fusion of 2 different sized gametes. 2 different gametes means 2 different sexes. Males have a phenotype that is organized around producing sperm. Females have a pheno

RT @DarkSoutherner: @JustinFREAKINS @lecanardnoir https://t.co/9goY1QrSga

@JustinFREAKINS @lecanardnoir https://t.co/9goY1QrSga

@hydropsyche1 @kayleigh_elt @AlphavilleXpres @celestelabedz @NSF Biologists don't make foolish statements about sex being a spectrum. Biologists don't conflate the spectrum of sex characteristics with the binary of sex. https://t.co/HHnlggsj3o

@WhatIsAWomanBot @Ashe2120 @SerbSwordsman @Libtard2022 @pierbii @MattWalshBlog The z axis is biological sex, which is defined by reference to the organisation of phenotypes in normal development around the production of one of two types of gamete, i.e. ani

@alexandrasaurus @NolanEP84 @Lisa0101010101 @jessiegender Science does exist. Words also matter for communication. Trolling means intentionally making inane comments so you can argue online for hours. We all understand what the definition means, and we kno

@Jennife50633173 @bottracker3 @From_NEPA @FOX56WOLF Please provide me with a single peer reviewed biology paper that defines the male and/or female sex. Perhaps that will help this discussion along. Here, I'll start: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@pjsparkles93 @MattWalshBlog @benshapiro https://t.co/9goY1QrSga

@pjsparkles93 @MattWalshBlog @benshapiro https://t.co/9goY1QrSga https://t.co/bkyKFU8qi0

@MVGNETDUBS @JoannieBeeGood ‘Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy).’ - https://t.co/LY9Vl9WWAy

@TheOneSwit @png85 @Reptolord @t_kuck @IsanRokai @bmj_bund @MarcoBuschmann Eben. Dass es zwei Geschlechter gibt! Keine 3, keine 5 und auch keine unsichtbare Genderessenz die bestimmt ob Kinder lieber Kleider tragen oder Fußball spielen https://t.co/LVwtem

@DrokarTheFluffy @lecanardnoir This is a peer reviewed paper from a biology journal which explains how and why only two sexes have evolved - https://t.co/QXjA65u2KY. You'll notice its authors are both professors and its content is consderable more advance

@SmuggPrincess @csd_gay @PwincessTwixy In case you don't know what a scientific paper looks like: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@liznobletweets @shutmyeyestosee @csd_gay @PwincessTwixy To show you what peer reviewed science looks like though, here's a paper that defines the sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@Carter_AndrewJ @GreetjeBoersma @MistyShares @adarcymraeg @DrFlob https://t.co/hBQ1lxchq1

@mysicksadlife @framboiserouge @Iris_Spun @onemomofthree3 @MistyKSnow @AdiDee_Gee @stevescott_itv @DIVAmagazine Please stop being silly. You know very well how biology defines the male and female sexes, and why. This Derridean deconstruction of language re

@DiscourseGirl @Arithrianos @QueenofNihilism @MelodyFenton4 @latsot @GregoryHo13 @AstroLlamaBeans @twitone @doodle_bobby @frankie_fatal @Hellmark @Seinneann @CassandraCmplex @MAMelby @the_damn_muteKi @Kimberfan76 @VerseusGreekus @m_mouse21 @PoesMyaa @Stitc

@LordManley @_____Gem @MathewsSonya You did a better job before introducing the idea sex isn't binary above. You should revise the how and why you're wrong on that because whilst you argue well - that idea will discredit you You can review the concept he

@5r85a6ktaiydjl1 @Carolinejanesvs @salltweets @WiseLsbianGuide Here is an example paper that explores why only two sexes have evolved and the dynamics in evolution that result in that fixed and stable number. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@TheTransJourno @Wommando Yes there is. Having the body type which, barring disease or developmental disorder, produces large sessile, not small motile, gametes. It’s the same in anisogamous species across living organisms. https://t.co/RNlRJz7IyJ

@JackoFlames @DaveyNodnol The sex is binary is ubiquitous in biology. No peer reviewed paper challenges this. We know very well why two and only two discrete sexes have evolved. As these biologists describe. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@medlockthought @PReconciliatio1 @demototown @jwsal @DuncanHenry78 That is a crank paper by a retired medic (not a biologist) who published that paper in her own journal. It is self-published and not a peer reviewed biology paper. This paper explains why

@_AngusRoe @SisNotyourCis It's not about how I would define them; it's about how biology defines them. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@Marco_123457 @Peitho70 @ImWatson91 In other words: you're unsure of how biology defines the sexes? Let me help you with that: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@BadBadLegalTak3 @CassandraCmplex @MillieButtery93 @the_damn_muteKi @Ana___fox @MelodyFenton4 @MAMelby @_FelineMenace @genderrepenter @doodle_bobby @SkipperHowls @forevershallon @QueenofNihilism @GregoryHo13 @Michael_AW77 @DanniBrener @ariana_erbon @LuisfB

@Ana___fox @MelodyFenton4 @BadBadLegalTak3 @CassandraCmplex @MAMelby @_FelineMenace @genderrepenter @doodle_bobby @SkipperHowls @forevershallon @QueenofNihilism @GregoryHo13 @MillieButtery93 @Michael_AW77 @DanniBrener @ariana_erbon @the_damn_muteKi @LuisfB

RT @mattjhodgkinson: @Neuro_Skeptic It's all about the gametes: Jussi Lehtonen & Geoff A. Parker: Gamete competition, gamete limitation, an…

@DCDeverell @Umbral_F @Dagwoodz @Timcast @tonyhawk On the off chance he is interested in facts and knowledge: https://t.co/sXw4aRaKAw

@intransit20 @setoacnna @61harpy @ClaraRoseLove1 #Genderborged biology is a hoot. Here is a peer-reviewed journal by actual biologists https://t.co/6N0w7e20xF

@lwsrk @ClaraRoseLove1 What about “the concept” of the 3rd gamete? https://t.co/6N0w7e20xF

@Neuro_Skeptic It's all about the gametes: Jussi Lehtonen & Geoff A. Parker: Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes. Basic science of reproductive medicine, Volume 20, Issue 12, 1 December 2014, Pages 1161–1168, https

Sharing to help you innoculate your kids from #GenderBorg captured/assimilated or intimidated "science". I am not a biologis, but I know what a woman is. But it REALLY is good to follow/know some actual evolutionary or developmental biologists!!

@sidesplitt @Tara7of9 @Patrici16650999 @OwenJones84 Your uni lecturers are full of horseshit. Here is a paper that describes why sex is discrete and why only two sexes have evolved., for example. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@d4nny1337 @hoovlet @erichvieth @byrne_a It lists peer reviewed studies Again there is not a single peer reviewed study that backs your claim One of the studies from the picture I sent you https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5

@RockHardScoop @hoovlet @EPoe187 https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@JestTerrible @lecanardnoir @Jirijatel69 @shurheed @DagnyTaggart369 Do this paper by Lehtonen and Parker, which explains why only two sexes have evolved, seem 'overly simplistic' to you? https://t.co/9uDSVNMoam

@GamerForBritain @MintieMate It's irrelevant what you and I "think" in this regard. This is science, not sociology. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@PStormhuntress @HermioneG_GCF @NihilisticNacho @peacelove1967 @keffals @jk_rowling If you're denying this, then you are indeed pushing an ideological agenda. Every peer reviewed biology paper you can find that defines the male and/or female sex will do so

@DragonFishOfish You don't know what "of, relating to, or being" means then I presume? Humans are defined as bipedal, but if you lose a leg, you don't stop being human. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@polearmguy Don't accuse people of not understanding biology if you're unable to answer a simple question. Your ad hominem attacks are nothing but a diversion for your ignorance. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@hopperonica @libsoftiktok https://t.co/9goY1Qsq5I

@CamelMeetNeedle @respectmysex @KatyMontgomerie Since you seem to have a problem with dictionaries as a source though: https://t.co/HHnlggJTUW

RT @lecanardnoir: @BrentonLengel @BrawnSurgeon @CatPadme @onepablo @zeno001 @MikeSTL5 @WitchHazel4n1x1 @trumpforusa @PostAshley42 Are these…

@BrentonLengel @BrawnSurgeon @CatPadme @onepablo @zeno001 @MikeSTL5 @WitchHazel4n1x1 @trumpforusa @PostAshley42 Are these biologists suffering from an illusion then in describing how two discrete sexes evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@BrentonLengel @BrawnSurgeon @CatPadme @onepablo @zeno001 @MikeSTL5 @WitchHazel4n1x1 @trumpforusa @PostAshley42 These biologists here are describing in a peer reviewed paper shot or knowledge of why two, and only two, discrete sexes have evolved. Are they

@epifloyd @JaneDowz A series? Well we can do a few - perhaps one at at time so we can actually read them. I can start off with this paper which synthesis what we know about how the two sexes (male and female) evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6

@J_Star5060 @TelluricMusic @Kitty_NyanNyan1 @wsgimjosh @YaBoi1909 @barefoot920 @kennybeats No, in biology the sexes are defined by gametes. People with XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) are male by biological definition. https://t.co/HHnlggsj3o

@MaskHate @LifeonWheels95 @EveOvertone @CaraMassimina @Bronwen85 Some do, but if they don’t it’s because every scientist knows. “Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female se

@ignisXIII @Dudenheihmer @alirilali @swoletarian @ContraPoints We can look at the actual peer reviewed biologyliterarture if you like. Here is a very good paper that describes why two discrete sexes have evolved in nature. Two and only two. https://t.c

RT @NathanielHart72: @Seej500 @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @nullgenderadult @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWom…

RT @lecanardnoir: @Seej500 @nullgenderadult @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWomenS…

RT @gc_feminist: https://t.co/i7wWG7xAFX

RT @NathanielHart72: @Seej500 @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @nullgenderadult @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWom…

@Seej500 @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @nullgenderadult @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWomenScot @mscots41 What absolute nonsense. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

RT @lecanardnoir: @Seej500 @nullgenderadult @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWomenS…

@AximGayming @SissiphusHypno @JamesSwiss21 @jn_pickles @CH005Y That is not true. Only male and female sexes have evolved. A XXX organism develops as female but with possible disorders due to the extra dose of X. Sex has a strict biological definition. Eg

RT @lecanardnoir: @Seej500 @nullgenderadult @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWomenS…

@DrDFox1 @mogar245 @McgeePatches @FeministRoar @Finn_Mackay Okay, so here is some actual science from a peer reviewed journal and well above grade school level, which explains how and why only two sexes evolved in humans and other gonochoristic species - h

RT @lecanardnoir: @Seej500 @nullgenderadult @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWomenS…

@Seej500 @nullgenderadult @OGrunen @leilaclaire @RachelTervin5 @makeitmakes3n3e @Charlie67830260 @Michael_AW77 @ForWomenScot @mscots41 You really have no idea what you are talking about, do you? Here is one paper that gives all the definitions and reasoni

@GazpachoTexas That's not the case at all as the science shows: https://t.co/J3v8PTcLOe https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs https://t.co/MHw3G50ejp I don't think we're going to see eye to eye on this though, so I'm leaving this here.

@pawley_robert @TonyBaduy @PremChamp1 @HuggyKitty @DevinNunesMulet @couturegems @RayEppsFaker @IdunsDaughter @GeoffSchuler @provaxtexan @KStateTurk @itisjustmebabe @JonathanHannah @ConsequentialBr @mcfunny @MatthewNewell67 @pompili_amanda @conkyan @canyon_

@WithTheBats @SubduedRadical @JeromeK99608397 @MatieNicholls @Pugz069 @NotABlindTrust @briantylercohen @elonmusk Nonsense. Sex is defined by gametes. People with intersex conditions are just as male or female as you and I. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@Iamthisnotthat1 @GazpachoTexas @Rimbaud587 @RaeUK @KSdsdXXY @XO83766320 https://t.co/LrY7vcrfGG

@GazpachoTexas @DaysGoByGoBy @RaeUK @KSdsdXXY @XO83766320 @Iamthisnotthat1 The following papers contain more detail as to the biological classification of sex: https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs https://t.co/J3v8PTcLOe Also of interest is this article by a person

@aag3981 @SinisterSteel @GungaDon1 @JaguarPaw90 @JohnCottle1 @SaraGonzalesTX As for the biological definition of the sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg

@huhef22 @BigFcknHoleCRU @Psu7893 @MarshaBlackburn @SenateGOP https://t.co/9goY1QrSga https://t.co/suvfUrsZ67