@kenlipartito @SeanfuciusSay @LeithMotive @MrMMarsh @gorskon Let us start with your first quibble. All of biology is unanimous on the fact that there are two evolved sexes and only two. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@biophilo @LeithMotive @MrMMarsh @gorskon Here is a paper from the journal of human molecular reproduction discussing why 2 and only 2 sexes have evolved. What have they got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@stonehead @NewEricHoffer @LucioMM1 @americnhumanist Unless of course you are a Creatinist version 2.0, that denies the evolution of sex itself? So to claim sex is not binary in mammals is fundementally at odds with biological evoution https://t.co/mKOZz
@PotatoWeeabo @N3S73 @9_volt_ @benshapiro Here. What you will find is that the binary of sexes is not question. What science today asks is WHY is the binary so stable as reproduction without sexes or three sexes is imaginable. How the binary evolved and
@fddlstx @AlexAlicit @JamFirst93 @RaeUK Also no scientist describes the two sexes as a peak of parts . https://t.co/oZ3cXyisPa
@wastedchick3n @RealWeebTrash @fckeveryword Here is a paper on the evolution of the two sexes. Definitions are included in the paper. No paper will contradict this. https://t.co/3GsgARkdOw
@ProletariatRis1 @SimianSamurai1 @XO83766320 @FondOfBeetles @FrostyBaron @Julio_Vichon @gabissima @adhib @RaeUK @joyously_april @BupkisStephen @gm68581174 @RichardDawkins @AlexAlicit @EndosexD @ClareCAIS So your view is not the contents but to make regress
@sphericaltime @SebastianPott10 @RyanLedbetter20 @Iamthisnotthat1 @joshy97946 @RichardDawkins @ClareCAIS @RaeUK @AlexAlicit @JamesLinehan3 @IntersexAF https://t.co/oZ3cXyA4dK . Also gametes are competitive.
@indigolynx @queerbobacat @tobselirt @AnarchyPunished @M_LeninistSco1 @LunaOi_VN @Madheretic @CCleverName Just one paper at random on the evolution of 2 sexes linked explicitly to anisogamy - two gamete types. Your move. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@FactualDisc @SammySammyStagg @Iamthisnotthat1 @logical_ultra @Mayer94455909 @Openly I suggest you look the studies up listed and one is a link which I guess you never read either Here is another and I can do this all day There is not a single peer revie
@Yeester15 @byron9164 @Openly Ah, the tongue in cheek 5 sexes model by Fausto-Sterling, who still isn't able to actually define any of those 5 sexes or the boundaries between them. Try some actual science: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@frinferneepers @Rindent10 @JoshABlock How about you produce just one paper that actually defines any of the sexes in accordance with those new attempts to define sex. Just one. For example: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@cheomitII @byron9164 @Openly Anisogamy is differently sized sex cells, so neither and both are not included. You can read more here: https://t.co/mhq7rvLooL https://t.co/5kDlESLtS3 It’s also discussed in The Selfish Gene (p.127) https://t.co/cIOC6xoKR3
@SuperGl75369697 @Openly that is not how they are defined https://t.co/mhq7rvLooL
@AMusicalTreeRat @I_Lostalim @LaradeClare1 @bocisaro @ACLU This paper on the other hand uses the biological definition of sex, and as a result has no issues whatsoever defining the sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@RepDickSwett @miniekarina @JohnStevenSaul @BroOrtho @magisbac @andreagail_k @therecount No, that paper claims that gender, not sex, is bimodal. Sex is binary, and defined by gametes. DSDs have taught us that sex characteristics often show a bimodal distri
@sphericaltime @RaeUK @radfemghost @tut_fatstuff @JustHeretic and this one? https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species wi
@fennec_sasha @Mr_Melts_ @Secux2 This biology paper has definitions and explains why two sexes evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@fennec_sasha @DM_Opal @Mr_Melts_ @Secux2 Here is a paper on the evolution of the two sexes. It explains why only two sexes have evolved. What have these biologists got wrong in your superior and knowledgable opinion? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@peteraktiv @bullrike @stephan_eckner @GeorgineKellerm @Kommunikatorin @Emmanzipation Sie verbreiten Fake News https://t.co/VshWBHZeTN
@nhs_groverhaus @NitkoUsamljeny @SwissAct19 @The_Terroirist @Inle_rahbit @guardian_sport @seaningle As well as one of many biology papers I could cite that actually define biological sex: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Brittan64277092 @The_Terroirist @InformalWave @mPinoe @WorldRugby Here, some basic science for you. Perhaps you should consider trying for that high school diploma again sometime in the future. 😀 https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@One__for__One @ArkaneX_ @Shina20269455 @RealKevinWade I cited you a per yesterday that went into detail about what a sex is. It is clear you have zero intention of wanting to understand what the biology says. Utter intellectual dishonesty. Here is it ag
@One__for__One @Shina20269455 @ArkaneX_ @RealKevinWade You never did say what these biologists have got wrong… Are they also "circle jerking elementary school lessons”? Looking forward to your insight. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@One__for__One @Shina20269455 @ArkaneX_ @RealKevinWade When you cite a paper, we will read it. For example, are these biologists wrong about what a sex is and how two have evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@CDMendenhall @jackjprosper @Rongwrong_ @SwipeWright What on earth are you on about? Here is a much more recent review of the evolution of oogamy. Do note the number of sexes that evolution has produced. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ChrisPandapas @CleverCasmir @FrauZora @AMinorGod @praxispowers @DanielWhiley @CarolineTart @SteveWithAQ @ActualCorn Biology has very strict definitions of what a sex is. There is nothing vague about what a sex is. You are speaking from a position of i
@CleverCasmir @FrauZora @AMinorGod @praxispowers @DanielWhiley @ChrisPandapas @CarolineTart @SteveWithAQ @ActualCorn That is an ideological definition, As you can see the biology does not make this stupid mistake. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@CleverCasmir @AMinorGod @FrauZora @praxispowers @DanielWhiley @ChrisPandapas @CarolineTart @SteveWithAQ @ActualCorn Why do no primary biology papers say this? The peer reviewed biology is crystal clear and unanimous. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@CleverCasmir @FrauZora @AMinorGod @praxispowers @DanielWhiley @ChrisPandapas @CarolineTart @SteveWithAQ @ActualCorn A sex is a reproductive role based on a gamete type. As there are two gamete types there are two sexes: male and female. Full definitions
RT @SimonMaxfield8: @SlintSimon @Mazdafun2 @GoddessEnergyXX @BethStelzer This peer-reviewed paper explains why sex is binary and represents…
@SlintSimon @Mazdafun2 @GoddessEnergyXX @BethStelzer This peer-reviewed paper explains why sex is binary and represents the large consensus of evolutionary biologists for the last five decades: that gametes are the ultimate definition of sex. Science does
RT @logical_ultra: @pewreview @Shae_AR @trailer_parker Sex is classified according to the gametes an individual's reproductive system is co…
@AliCologne @Fischerin5 @DEllis52426813 Dieser Artikel erklärt sehr gut die Hintergründe der Evolution der zwei Sex= zwei Geschlechter da es zwei Gametentypen gibt https://t.co/UBH4wTsNIC
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
@ImplausibleGrrl @GCITC2 @AlexAlicit @HumanGayMale @Joshuahubbard__ @BFIFlare @BFI I'm sure at least one of them wrote a peer reviewed biology paper defining sex and the sexes then, right? You know, something like https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
RT @Anarchopology: Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Ge…
Science is actually very clear that sex is not binary. Intersex refers to those w/out XX or XY chromosomes (I.e XXY) Gender (as opposed to sex) is a cultural construct to categorize & express difference. What this person here is referring to is “ideo
@DocFreemo @kavverz @FondOfBeetles @zaelefty It is peer reviewed Show me a peer reviewed biological paper that backs your assertion of bimodal? How about some more for you? https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@vamp_euro @JCvenny @BuzzLatyear @zyxalis @MattWalshBlog @benshapiro Um, all of peer reviewed biology defines the sexes according to function with respect to each gamete type. A typical paper on the evolution of sex and why only ever two discrete sexes h
@Ezbior @MarkBWills @pinkskink @416SJG @InkwellPaul @N8V_Calgarian This paper explains why only two discrete sexes has evolved in a billion years. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Bossman103 @MurphyYuiko @ziltam @RCReed40 "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)". https://t.co/O3icoMDYI
@GFunkRailJunk @jessesingal Sex is defined in biology by reference to development pathways which, when fully functional, support the production of either small (male) or large (female) gametes. Two types of gamete = two sexes. See Lehtonen (2014) - https:
@TimHuttonAu @KirralieS If you really want it spoon fed to you: FEMALE: The adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes. MALE: The adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes. Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). https://t.co/JMP2PLp8kL https:/
@so_eh03 @oVoBosa @j_ubiquity My evidence is that you have not cited a single source yet in the primary literature to back up this outlandish claim. Biology is *full* of papers like this that describe the evolution of *only* two sexes. https://t.co/3Gsg
@ballaschk @Wiedzmuszka1 @yfbc @jvveenvliet Even you are not an expert, here is a biology paper that discusses the thinking on how sex evolved. It contains lots of definitions. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Wiedzmuszka1 @yfbc That is not what the paper I cited says, is it? What have they got wrong here? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Wiedzmuszka1 This paper is quite good as it includes lots of attention to definitions. It clearly states two discrete sexes have evolved and only two. What have they got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Nigel_ITBassest @LeoneEmmett @CondemnedThroat @MrMattClark @vantablackpill @silviakillings I have given you a peer reviewed biology paper that defines all the terms. Here it is for you again. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Nigel_ITBassest @LeoneEmmett @CondemnedThroat @MrMattClark @vantablackpill @silviakillings Well we could take *any* biology paper that discusses the nature of sex. Here is one on how sex evolved. You do believe in evolution, right and are not some crank
@paralt1 @TheLondonSmoke @your_goblin_mom @brattyboypug @Tweed_Thneed "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogam
@rigger_john @adult_human_fem @RichardDawkins @Humanists_UK This is a good example paper that discusses current theories of the evolution of sex. And how evolution has produced exactly two sexes and only two sexes through extreme anisogamy. What have the
@lemon_he4d @InclusiveLucie @MForstater Sorry - posted wrong paper. Here is the correct one on the evolution of the two discrete sexes. Also interested who you think is a terf - and importantly - why? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@palfreyman1414 @LeithMotive This paper on the evolution of reproductive strategies is crystal clear that only two sexes have evolved and give reasons for that. Why do you say there are “many sexes”? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@miguelwildlife @Eugeninho_BR @RepMTG That is not a biology paper. That is a medic’s paper on the sociology of teaching anatomy and it is riddled with ideological bias. Here is an actual biology paper on the evolution of sex. Please note definitions. h
@RowanAndBerry @AmoralSupport All biology papers treat sex as categorical and there are two of them - defined by gamate types. Here is a paper that discusses how the two sexes evolved. What have these biologists got wrong in your opinion? https://t.co
@RowanAndBerry @AmoralSupport Well we can look at some biology papers off you like to see how a sex is defined there. How about this one om the evolution of the two sexes? What have they missed in your opinion? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@jocealmighty @helicoptrodctyl @meanlene @LoreleiOhMy @GBsBeltBuckle @KMDgoBlue @Beorn2000 "Please stop using the dictionary" Calling for people to stop using accepted definitions of words isn't intellectual. It's dumb.🥴 "use scientific evidence (studies
@Desi_Bellerose @Cyberweasel89 @serenitygroo @gerbiltweet @secretlandscape @brianmoore666 Well here is one paper about the evolution of sex. As you can see, the biologists say there are two discrete sexes defined by gamete type. Have they got it wrong? ht
@vajra21 @GayerSpidey @LightControl2 @OzmaCarmine @AtheistMom10 @legndofphoenix @amazingatheist Oddly enough it is that simple. There were gametes before humans,or mammals. Even some algae have male and female gametes. They are fundamental to sex. The bodi
@Kent_in_Utah @SportyMcSports "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)". https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@siponen_matti @ThisIDKMyDude https://t.co/Zjf5MBWUI5 Female Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems. Male Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that pr