RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
@CarlSmytheCells @Wes0103 @rosykaren @zaelefty @IanCopeland5 Or a pretty famous paper on the evolution of the sexes https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
RT @TomasBogardus: @IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He chall…
@IanCopeland5 @IanCopeland5 says the gamete-based definition of sex is fictitious, and not born out of biology. He challenges @SwipeWright to give one example of a biologist endorsing this. Here's just one of very many that can be provided. Quotation in th
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
@noveltyintact @zaelefty @IanCopeland5 Seems like you don't know what you're talking about. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@sanditoksvig We aren't blue headed wrasse or even fish. Sex is not a spectrum and we can't change sex.
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
RT @zaelefty: @IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolu…
@IanCopeland5 For a great scientific intro into the topic of why there are only two sexes, read this paper from leading evolutionary biologists. https://t.co/cY877r4NSo
@MaybinJuli1305 @ElmaFudd_64 @AGallagherAlly maybe next time you should do some basic research before opening your mouth https://t.co/FF8ttXT3wZ https://t.co/0lmXIiV3DT
@Astr0nomica1 @RonnieSerp You don't know what you're talking about. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@My_May_flower @SpacemannDan @NZXXYGraeme @whitefeelimgs @christapeterso Why are you denying biological science? https://t.co/O3icoMEwxO
@Cathemine_odose @maika_anarchiya @Willflex4food @plurasmorgan @CraigDaCentrist Or actual biologists 🤷♂️ https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
RT @Davey_Giggles: @StevenGrahamTWS @RobertASteed @KatyMontgomerie No, sex is binary. This is a consequence of our evolutionary history. Hu…
@TheShyWoof @FelixLyran @OchsAlicia24828 @TRedknapp @SoupTransphobes @KatyMontgomerie This image is probably more in line with Andrea Long Chu's definition of the sexes, but for a biologist's pov, I'd recommend something more academic. https://t.co/c2JIijp
@NyanKesh @NMDev0 @brayhydra Colin Wright has a Ph.D in evolutionary biology, but there are other sources. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@SolarStarMan @cringethewolf I'm using the same definition biologists use. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@WiggyStark @nothanksnopeyno @JustMisogyny People who study sex...you mean like Professor Parker - one of the world's leading experts on the subject. One of his peer reviewed biology papers is linked and it is quite clear in the fact that two (and only tw
@Gregory45897941 And on why humans are anisogamous, i.e. have exactly two sexes: https://t.co/lVktUw4DuC
@Bathilde777 @all4justice100 @JamesEsses @elonmusk Yes, Anna. I have already responded for that tweet. Here are the two peer reviewed biology papers (actual science) I have shared with you to support your education. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d https://t.co/
@Bathilde777 @all4justice100 @JamesEsses @elonmusk Blimey(!) You have an awful lot to learn about the sexes. This paper was written by one of the world's leading experts of the field. It is written in generally non-technical language so even you ought to
@DreadPirateEsk @KatyMontgomerie First: https://t.co/08gonmS3df gives a good definition. 2: the application of the definition is consistent, verifiable, and repeatable. 3: lets stop using individuals with DSDs as a tool. They are either male or female.
@DaveCranstonMan @zaelefty Good that neither Zach nor I are relying on architects definitions: https://t.co/Cqi1WmDuZR
@Irakaf2 @KatyMontgomerie Montgomerie is unlikely to have been the subject of a study himself. That he is male would be elementary to almost all medical professionals. Here is an article for you on anisogamy as it relates to humans that might help you to u
@KatyMontgomerie No matter how many you block - the science still stands - and so does basic human biology - despite your temper tantrums: https://t.co/ZHr2fTdlKL
@ATypicalPan @tonysullybooks @AndrewA4w @W4vyJ14nn4 @93mm4 @_samanthalux If you want to read more about the evolution of the two (and only two) sexes: https://t.co/eaARgSMUo6 https://t.co/dz3FVqxC2O
@EmzCollett @zaelefty Actual peer reviewed biology papers by actual biologists: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/OZyf9YT7oL
@Mattycakes09 @marine_veteran_ @TheLeftistVet @GenFlynn Oh man... science doesn't agree with you. Just man and woman... no intersex. Sex is binary, although the way to that sex is not binary. Science doesn't care about feelings. https://t.co/Pi9P6RzUx2
@pascualita420 @Paul_Ilett It is. There are two sexes in all anisogamous species. (This also includes people with DSDs, as they are still either male or female, never a 3rd sex) If you want to read more about the billion+ year evolution of the two sexes:
@CindyOlds2 @_Wimpod_ @ChaosRocket @UglaStefania I have already responded to you here:
@CindyOlds2 @ChaosRocket @UglaStefania If you are going to spread your comments over multiple tweets it is beneficial to number them. To avoid splintering the conversation I have already responded here:
@CindyOlds2 @ChaosRocket @UglaStefania The sexes (male and female) are the two anisogametic reproductive strategies. Here are three peer reviewed biology papers: https://t.co/y8oyhqpaIa https://t.co/kzkbuGom23 https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@Quartz_Tower @Moonshoes472 @JustMisogyny Devastating rebuttal. https://t.co/xx1vS3tlVi
@mountainschuy @bminn7660 @NYrepublican02 You posted screen shot from a blog. If you have anything peer reviewed by professional biologists that contradicts this, please share. https://t.co/xx1vS3tlVi 'Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolu
@Nico_the_egg @5012Carm @Bnasheeee @ZOE_SEQNC Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes. https://t.co/fVEhm8MIPL
@neetgirlangel @frerardie I hope you read this, but I won't hold my breath. https://t.co/xx1vS3tlVi
@Jaiden_Kett @ShiroMayonakaTV You need better sources. The sexes are not defined by chromosomes. Not all animals have X/Y chromosomes, some have no sex chromosomes at all. All anisogamous species have reproductive anatomy relating to sperm or ova, even if
@Iditrii @CassandraCmplex @MackSharky Hermaphroditism is a sexual system, not a sex, that doesn't exist in humans. Where it is found in nature it's defined as: systems in which male and female sexes exist in the same individual, i.e. a single individual pr
@oldanon1776 @Jasper33430720 @KeithInKeyWest @joncoopertweets You are absolutely right. Only two sexes have evolved, but there are myriad sex determination mechanisms. If you are interested here is a paper by one of the world's leading experts in this fi
@SeraStanAcc @ShantiPixie @whitley_rick Citation from a peer reviewed biology source needed. Extra points for a real bimodal graph of sex with real data. Or pull your head out and read this. https://t.co/xx1vS3tlVi
@Arian10masumi @Bloody_Lillith Yes, Forrest is an anthropology student. He doesn't have a degree in biology, and he deceptively conflates karyotypes with sexes. Better to get your information from the peer reviewed primary biology literature. https://t.co
@Dan59656037 @RubySpacek @vlamnvlamn @impishpixiee Did you cite sources identifying a third gamete? https://t.co/xx1vS3tlVi
@KeithInKeyWest @oldanon1776 @Jasper33430720 @joncoopertweets I strongly suggest not learning biology from YouTube. This is why you are muddled, Keith. Here is a peer reviewed biology paper written by one of the world's leading experts in this field. http
@Bloody_Lillith Sex is the union of genomes and gametes. Males and females (the sexes) evolved from from gamete dimorphism (anisogamy) and they existed long before modern humans, and evolved independently in different species with various determination m
@DaneWil96520425 @Cilotech @TheBigRitt62318 @EconsolaN @ConsiderThis19 @tr123xyz @CollinRugg @Babble365 Is this parody? Why can't you find a peer reviewed paper written by a professional biologist to back you up? 'Gamete competition, gamete limitation, an
@TdpAtlaToaBcM If you were to try to look at sex and the sexes (males and females) from an evolutionary biologist's pov it might start to seem silly and myopic to define males and females by a collection of human traits. https://t.co/xx1vS3tTKQ
@KtuluRob @WaitImCurious @caitlinmoriah Here, let’s try actual peer reviewed work https://t.co/9rwtKAgoXW
@RAMoon8 @nostringsonme23 @mimmymum Science says there are two sexes. Stop spreading misinformation. https://t.co/xx1vS3tlVi
@jaschil224593 @CptBucklew Ja, fasst den Stand gut zusammen. Aber wir können auch in Fachartikel gehen: https://t.co/Csc8AOgKNk https://t.co/puxY3IBNPi Oder hier: Richard Dawkins https://t.co/u0Rs0pTAyp oder Darwin https://t.co/yEGnRy3TIh
@No7Sammy @AxOfBrevity @MarkAda99 @2gametes I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I wonder how you think you came to exist. https://t.co/c2JIijpFiH https://t.co/WFOJR9AunG
@AxOfBrevity @MarkAda99 @2gametes @No7Sammy How about biologists? Seems unlikely they would lack the vocabulary to describe and study how we evolved to reproduce. https://t.co/c2JIijpFiH
@CloverSevenLeaf I'll see your gish gallop, and raise you something in a peer reviewed journal by a real biologist. https://t.co/c2JIijpFiH
@Soupyisgone @GNQ__ @BellaRizinti Fair enough: “Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy).” https://t.co/OhPU7
@gideonmack @gender_is_bs @Hare_Witch @helenstaniland @beccajiggens You’ll have to provide yours then. I’m waiting ☺️ https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@tireallday Do you think a cartoon is advanced biology? Where are the studies you linked to? I only see opinion pieces. Please find and post the study that upends this foundational discovery. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@SwamijiSamantha @HasItSunkIn @Cilotech @zaelefty I'd be interested in an non-blog based response to this from a peer reviewed journal. 'Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes' https://t.co/c2JIijpFiH
@ashtray161 @GovTrump @Johnmc42069 @elonmusk Biologists will tell you only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@ProfBadPerson @aniobrien @efesocollins No one changes sex, bud. Your ”sex” is your reproductive role: until those males have the anatomy and physiology that allows them to release ova rather than one that is designed towards sperm production, then they h
@JustAnotherDan @BJ19791 @NickFletcherMP Are gametes real? Do you know your mother from your father? https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@Pr1sonerBen @Nigel83208896 @LilUsdi Delete your account https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@Wh47D0Y0uW4n7 @deplorable_twit @WhiskyBirdDog @maklelan Forrest isn't published. He's an anthropology student who was defending his thesis last month. Cition 115 is a good one- it explains why sex is a strict male-female dichotomy: 'Gamete competition,
@libisumbrae @gender_is_bs @SecondBrick60 @SoupTransphobes @JustMisogyny You need proof there are are only two gamete types and evidence the sexes evolved from dimorphic gametes? https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9 "strict dimorphic thing" sounds like you're confusing
@SwamijiSamantha @claire88424030 @zaelefty @PTElephant @shamanspirit13 @NeuroSGS Is this paper abrahamic too? https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx
@wokehtklim @TReX2Gun @fletcherkathy8 @helenhairnets Your article does cite Parker, et al, which tells us why sex is a strict binary. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@theevilutionist @JacksonWheat1 Here, let’s look at some books and papers. https://t.co/9rwtKAgoXW https://t.co/Bm6UhzmsFS
@snowtree1931 @rubrogram @glitchinmetrix @coleryanxxx @lundyradio This paper explains why only two sexes. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@snowtree1931 @rubrogram @glitchinmetrix @coleryanxxx @lundyradio This is a classic paper from the world’s leading authorities the evolution of sex where they explain why only two discrete sexes have ever evolved: male and female. Lots of plain language fo
@jrpurdon @YouKnow42057892 @CloverSevenLeaf Your inability to understand my replies doesn't change what is understood by biologists. Have you even clicked on this? https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@jrpurdon @YouKnow42057892 @CloverSevenLeaf Biologists'. You should read this. https://t.co/c2JIijp7t9
@xoxoh3artsxoxo @MotherRockin @Invisible_TSW @untapbrainworms @AriDrennen @UW The sexes (males & females) only exist in anisogamous species. Sexual dimorphism evolved from gamete dimorphism, not the other way around. I'm guessing you're thinking of i
@jrpurdon @YouKnow42057892 @CloverSevenLeaf The sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy), which should be our first clue. Females are the sex that produce large gametes and males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gamet
@LevityLeviathan What’s your background? Have you studied biology? I have. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@4amBondrewd @sasori6111 @Daderp1242389 @Tellmemore87 @BendersSL @PhotobombingC @KatyMontgomerie I don't know how you define your terms, so please name a condition you wan to discuss. The sexes evolved from anisogamy. You can read about it in the primary