@Mattsy117 @LaddGiacomo @Nastypouch @Melbourne_lurk @ProfessionalJu2 @Paul_Ilett @TransHomophobes The peer reviewed biology is crystal clear about only two sexes evolving. We know why on two sexes have evolved. You have swallowed a lot of ideological nonse
@FallenX0Angel @HerpEnjoyer @DutchNeoliberal @whanganui61 @KatysCartoons Are you really sure? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@camy_dev @paulmyszor @sbkaufman See the following links for a rebuttal of the 'sex is a spectrum' pseudoscience, along with an insight into the actual science: https://t.co/XxMFR7wVGO https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs https://t.co/f1dxLKGC0k https://t.co/WNDa7u
@DrDFox1 @BadMedicalTakes Have you checked? Because I have and look what I found… https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/OZyf9YT7oL https://t.co/zbdm7ZMma6 https://t.co/HITRnfmZoC
@thieving_misery @SophieTews @OverContentious @cjmarley @BadMedicalTakes By all means, feel free to demonstrate sex has a bimodal distribution with clear methodology. Meanwhile…. https://t.co/ZdB9Nsxe1g
@DuncanCantDie @Unity_MoT @Vox_Oculi @FactsMatterPpl @blaccherrii @Bornakang Again, this paper is about why only two discrete sexes have evolved. What have these world leading biologist got wrong in your opinion? https://t.co/3GsgARCn2E
@DuncanCantDie @Unity_MoT @Vox_Oculi @FactsMatterPpl @blaccherrii @Bornakang The whole "Sex is bimodal" nonsense is a queer theory cornerstone. It is nothing to do with biological science. The actual peer reviewed biology contradicts it. We know only two
@FactsMatterPpl @Vox_Oculi @blaccherrii @Bornakang And once again, the entirety of the peer reviewed biology agrees with me. In fact, it has been a research theme of the last decade or so as to why only two sexes have ever evolved. We understand that now
@E_Chrstnsn @bearshrugged @KathrynTewson @AkivaMCohen @jordanbpeterson "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisoga
@ppeee19 @texan_maga Actual science: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/zvPaAOkVaE
@PlatinumBubble @billonesty @John_outWest @SandmanSlim02 @SarahisCensored This is a very good paper that explains why only two sexes have ever evolved. It has good, clear explanations for the non-expert like you. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@GauteLund2 @Daderp1242389 @SwipeWright And there is nothing "monomaniac' about stating the simple and well established understanding in biology that sex is a strict dichotomy of male and female. We know why that is too. see here, for example... https://t
@BlueBearCharlie @yaboiovenz @atalanta44 @Tommy_Atwell @spikedonline @JamesEsses Well I am happy to be proved wrong. Here is a very good peer reviewed biology paper explaining why only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. Easy to understand explainers f
Here ya go. @thejoelancaster Have a good read, admit your claims about the scientific consensus and scientific literature are wrong and we'll take it from there.
@deuslapis @hallo_stranger @squirellfan @EuphoriTori @AmyBuchananan Are these biologists wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@deuslapis @squirellfan @AmyBuchananan @hallo_stranger @EuphoriTori This is the sort of thing I am after. - peer reviewed papers - by actual research biologists - that describe sex as discrete (as is here) or bimodal. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@muichimotsu @SwipeWright increase for all traits as some are discrete e.g. gamete & gonad types. The graph is PSEUDOSCIENCE. Sexually dimorphic traits like height & muscle mass are certainly bimodal but they're NOT sex itself. Sex is binary, as th
@thejoelancaster @9KnitKnots @iansambo @DJobling @ABCmediawatch Sure there are. Here's one: https://t.co/tJK3Ev5dDh Males and females only. Research biologist publication 2014
@VictorMoraLira1 @hallo_stranger @nbsurprise @TampaIsJason Okay so you still never checked. Nice. Biology of Reproduction by Fusco pg 112. Hine, Robert; Martin, Elizabeth (2015). A Dictionary of Biology. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/OZyf9YT7oL
@PenellopeParfum @AdoraFaerie @hallo_stranger @Burnix_Elf @EuphoriTori Why are these biologists lying? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/hRwK8b0N4U
@AdoraFaerie @hallo_stranger @PenellopeParfum @Burnix_Elf @EuphoriTori Why do you think biologists are wrong? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@khang_nguyen_k @BladeBoriss @Zoe_Brain @KatyMontgomerie You posted an opinion article. There are only two sexes because that's the most evolutionarily stable number in anisogamous species https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx https://t.co/8gWW8R7BMa
@KrCampbell99 @creg316 @forty9hills @ActivismEnjoyer @cupcakeboner @theserfstv This is literally an advanced reproductive biologu book. This is well known 😂 https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/DW3wpVMGBy
@BillKilvington @robscape @PatrickChristys There's a reason this is an opinion article and not a peer reviewed biology paper. Let me show you the difference: "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes i
@yanbosch @AMBWestside Sure . This is a good paper, written in accessible language, which demonstrates two sexes and explores why only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/fVEhm8MIPL
@XCLover666 @FrancescaElani @navyservant60 It’s not like this is, you know, something you can easily find in biology books and papers…. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/prx9pfQzc6
@AtlMugiwara @Daderp1242389 @ruin75 @Jakub8632 @EpochTimes OK. There are lots of papers on the evolution of sex. One big puzzle is why only two very different sexes have evolved. We now understand that in detail. This paper is an easy read for the non=expe
@quickhakker @subnorman5 @SimplyKiddy @MrBrexitHanky @loafjungle @misswallison @Serena_Partrick @Sorelle_Arduino @Wickes Here: Only men and women exist. https://t.co/tJK3Ev5dDh Your rebuttal?
@Camio91736713 @GewdWell @hm05677017 @BangyTalks @brokebackUSA What biology actually says: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/hsrmJQ2crU
@QueerasaurusLex @DuncanDonut0 @TrudePerkins @MorgothArc @K8T1144 If you ever change your mind, here's a good paper to start with for a layman: https://t.co/i7wWG7xAFX
@SeryphFanfics @For_XXs_Sake @BookBird71 @monsalore Well the whole of peer reviewed biology on the evolution of sex is consistent on this. This is a very good paper as it has easy to read explainers for non-experts like you. https://t.co/lI90SyDhIT
@RaccoonDBoone @TheBeardedFetus @Tomaso2137 @SBD23 @CrawfCol @jordanbpeterson Here is a good one, which is in accessible language. It demonstrates that two sexes have evolved, it also goes on to explain why two and not more. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@08Juan80 But, I asked you for a paper demonstrating sex is bimodal, where is it? Here is a good paper which explores the evolution of two sexes and explains why only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@Unity_MoT @workercommie @Maskhate @lecanardnoir @EerensMart @WinnowingWind @4Head91637989 @nominalnaomi That's probably because we aren't just talking "within the concept of anisogamy," which also means we aren't talking univocally. And it looks like thos
@Mathenaut @Aaronhn09 @POVyouaremad @PaulHook_em @EndWokeness I’ll ask again: provide a pear reviewed biology article by an actual biologist that statistically demonstrates sex has a bimodal distribution. It’s a consensus, right? So this should be easy. L
@SheenaQuatro @BAsgeirr @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser What’s more funny is you just took a big fat L ☺️ Next time read the thread https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@SheenaQuatro @BAsgeirr @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser “i ReAd tHe tHrEad” https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@BAsgeirr @SheenaQuatro @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser Are you high? I literally cited multiple sources. Why on earth would you not check the thread before declaring I didn’t? 🤦♂️ https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@SheenaQuatro @BAsgeirr @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser To be clear it’s insane tht I said I cited papers when I did? Are you okay? 😂 https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@BAsgeirr @SheenaQuatro @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser I’m embarrassed for you https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@Charleyyzard @CzechIreland @speakoutsister This is a peer reviewed biology paper, which is written in accessible language providing a very clear description of the evolution of sex into two discrete categories. It even explains why only two sexes have evo
@EerensMart @workercommie @4Head91637989 @nominalnaomi Are these biologists wrong? Before answering, note they are leading experts on the evolution of sex. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@shadell131 @damomen76 @SayreGamble @IainSankey @christapeterso What sort of citation would you like to show no research biologists say sex is bimodal in their peer reviewed literature? The fact is biologist research *whY* sex is discrete and just two of
@CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser Biology of reproduction page 112 by Fusco. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/zbdm7ZMma6 https://t.co/HITRnfmZoC
@robottopoet @adhib @babybeginner @j_archer_avary @APStylebook "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)". ht
@CRufsvold @Luvenalis1 @RealWorlding @RoniBeckman Yes, this paper is very clear and is written in very accessible language. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@CRufsvold @Luvenalis1 @RealWorlding @RoniBeckman Well, this one for example: https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d Every study about sex says the same thing. None say that sex is a spectrum.
@PULS3B0MB Um, in the peer reviewed biology, sex is *always* treated as categorical with two categories: male and female. We know *why* only two discrete sexes have evolved. This paper explains that. https://t.co/3GsgARCn2E
eicellen (door het vrouwelijke geslacht) en spermacellen (door het mannelijke geslacht). https://t.co/r475J5f9pe Het binaire karakter van geslacht illustreert bij uitstek de fundamentele wetten van de biologie:
@Dusk_alt @Youreanidiotpos @Liberty_Briefs @RndmFndms650002 @giveittomebabes This is a very good and easy to read paper from the top experts on the evolution of sex. Lots of good explainers. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Rrhain @WinnowingWind @Sir_Writes_aLot @Now8Dollars @abughazalehkat We can see how biologists have been working out *why* two and only two sexes have evolved and their direct relationships with the gamete types. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Rrhain @Sir_Writes_aLot @WinnowingWind @Now8Dollars @SuthrnYankeeT @abughazalehkat It shows a consensus at least. Here is a peer reviewed biology paper on the evolution of sex that explains why only two sexes evolved and does it in a very readble way fo
@chunkindorley @WanjiruNjoya @ArchRose90 There are just two gamete types. This paper by the world's leading experts on the evolution of sex explains why only two discrete sexes have evolved. Excellent summaries for the non-expert like you. https://t.co
@silvsmith0919 @SheenaQuatro @spacemanfranko @MaraMagnus @AndrewB_UK @BlamKaboom The gametes that they produce. https://t.co/Ro48s9qn75 https://t.co/B9YqD3rFOM
@spacemanfranko @MaraMagnus @silvsmith0919 @AndrewB_UK @SheenaQuatro @BlamKaboom Have you read this paper about the evolution of gametes? It's very interesting https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx https://t.co/vuhuX58dVW
@DesertFoxy0 What nonsense. The two sexes are an objective reality. That is what we observe in nature uniformly in sexually reproducing species. We know why only two sexes have evolved as a direct result of anisogamy. https://t.co/lI90SyDhIT
@WinnowingWind @ChloeMarxfan @TheJaffaCakeXX @ABitOverIt @scib0rg @Not_Siouxsie @meiriontodd @professor_dave Here's a free access copy: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@ChloeMarxfan @NathanielHart72 @TheJaffaCakeXX @ABitOverIt @scib0rg @Not_Siouxsie @meiriontodd @professor_dave Of course. This is a pretty good paper, and is accessible for laypeople (the language is of a non-technical nature). It explains that two (and o
@RenHavingFun @CompostTraining @OuroborosSouth @LiegeOf @thornyjulius That is incorrect. Evolutionary biologists fully understand the discrete nature of the two sexes is a result of runaway evolutionary process that created two distinct gamete types. htt
@WhisperingKers @gc_feminist @yoshimitsu4prez @1saiyangoku1 @_EveOnline @Janey3477 @JUNlPER I am happy to show you lots of peer reviewed biology papers that explain why only two sexes have ever evolved and that sex is a discrete category - not a bimodal di
@lucieeswag @SwipeWright @NeuroSGS @sciam There are ONLY two sexes lol. How about trying to read peer-reviewed biology papers instead of a SciAm blog opinion piece written by a TRANS-identifying male PhD student, Simón(e) D Sun, who's obviously going to be
@MattiBruur @EpisteMax @GeraldOkoroji @amnesty Genital ambiguity ≠ gonad ambiguity. Sex is not a spectrum. Anisogamy results in two sexes. https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx https://t.co/enQVVQkfEK
@Cassoulet_ @heyitsmario @prattleandsnap @daveunder @GeraldOkoroji @amnesty I have no issue sharing peer reviewed papers which back up my claim. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@lucieeswag @NeuroSGS @EpisteMax @GeraldOkoroji @amnesty @zaelefty Just starting with part 1: There are only two sexes, as a result of evolution. https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx Sex development is complex, yet 97.5% of trans people have normal karyotypes. 3% had k
@SendDopaminePls @BeullahGC No, it's the result of billions of years of evolution https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx https://t.co/OzpPscnVSv
@AuxDroidVT @TrueLevelBitch @zeno001 @lecanardnoir @LimJianLing @MeeZo24904267 @WholesomeMeme @OraneDef So you don't actually have any evidence? For the record, here's a biology paper which explains how and why only two sexes have evolved, just so you can
@2damntrans @ReedHawk2 @caitlinmoriah Remembering that paper that Zach E. kept citing, in which the authors state "The definitions of 'sex' and 'sexes' vary" (p. 1167, https://t.co/TFVX1ssqPp).
@RedemptionDaa @DrLoupis Perhaps you should ask your friend to read some actual peer reviewed biology papers on the subject of sex instead of opinion articles. Sex in biology is defined by gametes, and thus observed by reproductive phenotype. https://t.co/
@AuxDroidVT @TrueLevelBitch @LimJianLing @MeeZo24904267 @WholesomeMeme @OraneDef It looks like you are unable to back up your claims. Meanwhile this is what actual biologists say why two and only two sexes have ever evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@fuzzyface811 It is defined by the reproductive system and the form of gametes it is structured around, regardless of whether these gametes are produced. Males produce small gametes while females produce large gametes. This paper explains further: https:
@VincentSayer @dgme_d @TheTrueNanami @munro_nell @Doctor_Eric_B @MickSau03751671 @GodPlaysDjent OK. SO current research in biology is why only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. Here is one good paper with some plain language summaries for the non-exp
@BionicDance @elizabethgamm2 @Diego2112Gaming @jeee475 @MageGrayWolf1 @ATimeswift @darrengrimes_ @jk_rowling @Oxfam Find an advanced biology paper that calls them something else? Here's one for you: https://t.co/tJK3Ev5dDh Looks like just male and female.
RT @lecanardnoir: @Newtolife3 @SimoneSonder @achickenskeptic For example, this is an easily readable modern paper that can be understood by…
@Newtolife3 @SimoneSonder @achickenskeptic For example, this is an easily readable modern paper that can be understood by the non-expert like you. It describes why two and only two sexes have evolved and why each sex is tied to a gamete type. https://t.c
@lyseblahaj @yemichamberlain @Blader838 @PalominoOMG @sharonjenniferl @thevivafrei @iamharaldur Actual scientific literature: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/yhHraCbCTd
@2xinternet https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o Biology of reproduction by Fusco pg 112 Grzimek, Bernhard (2003). Grzimek's Animal Life Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. Gale. pp. 16–17
@haringbisexual @LetChaosRaine @JoyMoone @speakoutsister You can't change sex. Feel free to actually learn biology: https://t.co/tJK3Ev5dDh This is unrefuted, well understood and immutable. We are anisogamous. Period.
If a person doesn't think that sex is binary, they are denying evolution. Accepting science is not bigoted. https://t.co/flfiGUj73R https://t.co/0usOjPftgB
@I_Lostalim @ShallowYork @LGBwiththeT Sex is not determined by chromosomes; it is determined by reproductive system and the form of gametes it is structured around (regardless of whether such gametes are produced): https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs Never has a hum
@I_Lostalim @ShallowYork @EdgeOTI @LGBwiththeT Sweetheart, read some actual scientific papers. https://t.co/5IRZzW3eAk https://t.co/WNDa7uFlqe https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs
@kennedy5612 @DebraRu66150029 @DLerch22 @JoeyMannarinoUS Funny considering I happened to have done such research. They don’t, actually. Which is why you’re getting for info from blogs and magazines. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
RT @lecanardnoir: @odrakek @WinnowingWind @imthebaguette @R2dezki @KatyMontgomerie There are precisely two gamete types. Hence, two sexes.…
@gulliwog @SexNotGI @MForstater @stonewalluk This sentence is cited with 2 citations. One is the OED definition I cited earlier and the second is a book which discusses sex. Also, a cursory search found this interesting paper on the evolution of the two
@Rob_ThaBuilder He doesn't allow comments, otherwise I would have shown him the following and asked him to show me something written by biologists to support his claim. https://t.co/9NtCBHH0tr
@_M_Ard_ @One_Supernova @MaddyChloride @zaelefty I am more than happy to post it for you again. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@xasphodelx @WinnowingWind @wfcollins @MattWalshBlog Hine, Robert; Martin, Elizabeth (2015). A Dictionary of Biology. Martin, Elizabeth; Hine, Robert (2015). A Dictionary of Biology. Oxford University Press. p. 222. The Biology of Reproduction by Fusco
@xasphodelx @WinnowingWind @wfcollins @MattWalshBlog And what produces the sperm and egg? It is how professionals define sex. You’ve clearly never read a biology paper https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@YureiKurosawa @Somejoyinloife @aranel616 @surfjaseoz @MarkusSurvrey This is a paper which cleary demonstrates that two, and only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@KaliaTheShep @_Kirk_Douglas_ @SamusEevee @NeuroSGS @mangolover99 @Ph1lMcCr4ck3n @KateronaBiscuit There are hundreds of papers on the categorical nature of the two sexes. Here is a good one which explains not only that there are two sexes, but why only tw
@Stldevil311 @sunnyright A scientific source to define man and woman? Ok. Easy: https://t.co/tJK3Ev5dDh We are anisogamous which means two sexes. Male and female.