@EvanHug16577143 @Chestusvestus @newscientist @Judeet88 "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et
@BangThati As for the science, "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Both. https
@SimonMahan @kcboyce @timechols @BenjiBacker The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @LisajS_: The #ScientistsWarningtoHumanity https://t.co/V3tGilvZg2 is now available in 14 new languages from several continents. View he…
RT @LisajS_: The #ScientistsWarningtoHumanity https://t.co/V3tGilvZg2 is now available in 14 new languages from several continents. View he…
RT @LisajS_: The #ScientistsWarningtoHumanity https://t.co/V3tGilvZg2 is now available in 14 new languages from several continents. View he…
RT @LisajS_: The #ScientistsWarningtoHumanity https://t.co/V3tGilvZg2 is now available in 14 new languages from several continents. View he…
@TricksyRaccoon The lit review is fine (but IMO doesn't add anything beyond what was already in https://t.co/kPze32vhsI) except for the overpopulation bit (which is also a problem in the Second Warning). But the politics section is incoherent and avoids
Not acting on population growth which is 👉THE MAIN DRIVER👈 of ecosystem loss means that their efforts are doomed to failure. Why do you continue to be silent on population? Do you really care what Gates’ puppet Monbiot says? https://t.co/Dv1Eg5fmEm
@Xandracuga @QuantumFracture @navedelmisterio Hola. No. El debate lleva tiempo cerrado. Te adjunto un artículo firmado por unos cuantos miles de especialistas en el que hablan de qué cambios confirman que está crisis climática tiene origen humano, y no otr
RT @ClimateBen: @guardian None of this is front page news. 👇 'By failing to adequately limit population growth, *reassess the role of an…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @ClimateBen: @guardian None of this is front page news. 👇 'By failing to adequately limit population growth, *reassess the role of an…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @LifeVsLifestyle: Humans are jeopardising future by inviting mass extinction event within a few years! Policy makers must get alert to r…
RT @LifeVsLifestyle: Humans are jeopardising future by inviting mass extinction event within a few years! Policy makers must get alert to r…
RT @LifeVsLifestyle: Humans are jeopardising future by inviting mass extinction event within a few years! Policy makers must get alert to r…
RT @LifeVsLifestyle: Humans are jeopardising future by inviting mass extinction event within a few years! Policy makers must get alert to r…
Humans are jeopardising future by inviting mass extinction event within a few years! Policy makers must get alert to reverse the #climatechange. Read the report👇 World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice https://t.co/HN3o5LEanb @narendramodi @
@WesDJones @GeminiiAussie @gougle_lads @DanCady @dennywhite11 @ianbrow97534170 @canncr @KeillerDon How would you know what they're saying? Have you even read them? https://t.co/7Fmuyy2BVc
@WesDJones @GeminiiAussie @gougle_lads @DanCady @dennywhite11 @ianbrow97534170 @canncr @KeillerDon These are not opinion editorials. Try again. https://t.co/HjIJD7dTN5 -- https://t.co/P7gZoKYInk
@WesDJones @GeminiiAussie @gougle_lads @DanCady @dennywhite11 @ianbrow97534170 @canncr @KeillerDon How is it "my" UN? That's hardly a consensus particularly with a notoriously challenging subject of study not to mention controversial. https://t.co/GKYbjA
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
#Climate #ClimateBrawl #ClimateAction
@WesDJones @GeminiiAussie @gougle_lads @DanCady @dennywhite11 @ianbrow97534170 @canncr @KeillerDon Science denial? When our only biosphere is at stake, continued growth with anything less than a majority scientific consensus supporting it is reckless and
RT @ClimateBen: @guardian None of this is front page news. 👇 'By failing to adequately limit population growth, *reassess the role of an…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @ClimateBen: @guardian None of this is front page news. 👇 'By failing to adequately limit population growth, *reassess the role of an…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @ClimateBen: A period of 'vast human misery' has begun as scientists forewarned in 1992. Now the world's top 23,000 scientists agree: h…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
Here's a fast and informed decision for ya: KEEP FOSSIL FUELS IN THE GROUND. Signed: 15 thousand scientists https://t.co/ZudwD0cbGH #ClimateAction #CO2mustGO
@France5tv Si ça peut intéresser quelqu'un je pose ça là : https://t.co/U07uOvqQVq
RT @ClimateBen: @guardian None of this is front page news. 👇 'By failing to adequately limit population growth, *reassess the role of an…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice https://t.co/Jh5RcJFSj3 https://t.co/wvQyq05MLs
@doorsausage @martinrev21 @JulianCribb @phbarratt @ConversationEDU Hans was objectively unscientific & completely ignorant of the work of thousands of scientists on ecology, sustainability, climate science. Did you read the Quilette article? No you did
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
RT @elly_carra: @JustinTrudeau Yes pandemics suck. Take immediate actions to prevent future pandemics by transitioning out of animal ag, st…
@ClimateHuman Overpopulation, overconsumption, an economy rooted in growth, animal ag, fossil fuels. ..”humanity is not taking the urgent steps needed to safeguard our imperilled biosphere”. https://t.co/GuH1v30iAp
RT @Karmageddon67: The root cause of all of the above is in fact population growth. It is also the main cause of overconsumption as populat…
The root cause of all of the above is in fact population growth. It is also the main cause of overconsumption as population growth drives economic growth & increasing affluence, in combination with unsustainable environmental exploitation. https://t.
@JustinTrudeau Yes pandemics suck. Take immediate actions to prevent future pandemics by transitioning out of animal ag, stop deforestation & urban sprawl, transform the economy out of one rooted in endless growth & overconsumption. It is your duty
Seriously, would anyone believe an corporate economist or a corporate media economics journalist... Instead of 14 000 scientists??? But all our politicians have chosen to believe the corporate sock puppets... No wonder our planet is totally screwed.
RT @publicus_com: Już 25 lat temu wiodący naukowcy ostrzegali świat w swoim alarmującym liście o zagrożeniach dla Planety: 🆘 Niedoborze wod…
Już 25 lat temu wiodący naukowcy ostrzegali świat w swoim alarmującym liście o zagrożeniach dla Planety: 🆘 Niedoborze wody Wymieraniu życia morskiego Deforestacji Zaniku bioróżnorodności Zmianach klimatu Przeludnieniu Niestety nikt nie posłuchał. Dalej pę
@anarcho_goblin @cosmicandrogyny 1. Science. Don't muddy the waters. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological thre
@Vain_Utopian @deep_ecologie @liamhenneberry Science denial is trendy, and detrimental. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind m
@ShoujoGamer @NewmanJ_R @PeterRQuinones @jeffdeist Then you would be a science denier. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind ma
RT @_Expanded_Mind_: @celesstialfire Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material cons…
RT @_Expanded_Mind_: @rpvessels Science denial is trendy, and detrimental. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense m…
@SwungDashed Science denial is trendy, and detrimental. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et
@rpvessels Science denial is trendy, and detrimental. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et a
@NorseOwl_ @publicus_com Science denial is trendy, and detrimental. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threa
@Alfonso15825021 Reminder of this thing called science. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et
@AnarchoVera @HotFascistTakes People care about their egos, not facts. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological th
@Tony_simp_rano @Ingenium21 @cyningeastseaxe @the_moviebob @lnteGritty Science denial is trendy...and detrimental. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth a
@celesstialfire Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" h
@FactsMatterPpl @djhutch74 @EthanDMatthews Science is a right-wing talking point. But not. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption & by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver beh
@peacenicsta The science. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https://t.co/IhZi
@ShellenbergerMD I’ll take the views of 15000 scientists thanks rather than your denialist crap. https://t.co/Dv1Eg5fmEm
I’ll take the views of 15000 scientists thanks rather than your denialist crap. https://t.co/Dv1Eg5fmEm
@ShellenbergerMD @sapinker @JonHaidt @amcafee So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe o
@ShellenbergerMD @sapinker @JonHaidt So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe of climate
@ShellenbergerMD @sapinker So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe of climate & eco
@ShellenbergerMD So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe of climate & ecological br
@ShellenbergerMD So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe of climate & ecological br
@ShellenbergerMD So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe of climate & ecological br
@ShellenbergerMD So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe of climate & ecological br
@ShellenbergerMD So... A nuclear advocate paid for by industry with a vested interest in sensationalism (& comforting lies), is right, and 15 000 scientists with NO vested interest in witnessing the unfolding catastrophe of climate & ecological br
@StevenDealer @DesignCordero That is anti-science infotainment. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (
@earthsignsey Science denial is trendy too. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)"
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
@ZeframM It's called science. Denial of which is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption & by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist
@spoilpartygames @spencerlatu @citizencaz @ThisIsRowly You science-deniers are a curse on this planet "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption & by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
@WoollyBlueCurls "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Not a myth, but SCIENCE. No
@CriticalReading Science-denying capitalism reductionism. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist
RT @joel27799310: Hay quienes plantean −convenientemente− la lucha contra el #CambioClimático como una (falsa) dicotomía: o bien se cambia…
@charlotte_lasto @Youthstrikemcr 1/2. Of course it's true: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist
@andyblueskyz @KingBobIIV @lsrlinda "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Both. h
@SeannWritesStuf @Apolloryn @Jessica55912971 @Minmarion @AlyKat_89 Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver beh
@BolshieVince The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Both. https://t
To those who think overpopulation is real? Here's an explanation about how overpopulation is a dangerous myth in simplest words. https://t.co/6nWHVUZ8ca
@guilloTIME The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https://t.co/IhZiK
@pixelprotectors @Luvcario @scragsma70 @KTKeith @shxxn7 @LiveAction Idiocracy ladies & gentlemen. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary d
RT @_Expanded_Mind_: @bobby_sprung @Graci2005 @martinrev21 "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumpti…