↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Article Metrics

The evolution of floral guides: using a genetic algorithm to investigate the evolution of floral cue arrangements

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The evolution of floral guides: using a genetic algorithm to investigate the evolution of floral cue arrangements
Published in
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, February 2018
DOI 10.1093/biolinnean/bly011
Authors

David A Lawson, Sean A Rands

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 67%
Unspecified 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,972,295
of 12,959,714 outputs
Outputs from Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
#532
of 2,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,022
of 268,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,959,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.