| Title |
The Role of Scientists’ Warning in Shifting Policy from Growth to Conservation Economy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biy009 |
| Authors |
William J Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Mauro Galetti, Thomas M Newsome, Tom L Green, Mohammed Alamgir, Eileen Crist, Mahmoud I Mahmoud, William F Laurance |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 24% |
| Australia | 4 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 71% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 22% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#483,673
of 23,884,161 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#212
of 3,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,927
of 335,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#7
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.