@MagDods @RebeccaAVelo Paper: Genetic Evidence for Unequal Effective Population Sizes of Human Females & Males, published in the Oxford Journal of Molecular Biology & Evolution: https://t.co/Wly1LxJhGi Below, explained in plain English from: Is Th
@thina4thewina @Ascensions_Hope @TheHatGuy2 @whatthep0p @etherealzoey @tv3_ghana Its just common sense. Throughout history 80% of women have reproduced but only 40% of men. Women rate 80% of men as below average attractiveness. https://t.co/SKRZE5AMAT ht
@FuriaeTradicao https://t.co/cwzCXRShXg que vergonha. Cita um artigo para falar merda que não tem ABSOLUTAMENTE NADA a ver com sua conclusão burra. Vem cá, e tem gente que paga por curso seu? Como é o nome do curso? "Como ter medo de mulher e ser burro ao
@dannyelnomad @FuriaeTradicao https://t.co/cwzCXRShXg está aqui o artigo inteiro citado por ele..INTEIRO. Veja se alguma coisa do que ele disse sobre o artigo faz sentido. 😂😂😂 ele nem sabe o teor do artigo. E tem gente que paga assinatura para esse cara. L
@dannyelnomad @FuriaeTradicao https://t.co/ZjYs8IzrZA ele está citando esse artigo, que fala sobre mitocôndrias. Não tem nada a ver com a "conclusão" que ele tirou do koooo. Leia lá. ,😂😂😂 e tem gente que paga para ler esse cara. Veja o papel da mitocôndria
@datepsych Have you read this study before? Any thoughts/critiques of it? https://t.co/xQAvoYxvJD
@woot_woot26 @Ravie777 @thegreygal @wanyeburkett 🤣🤣🤣 Sounds like you’re upset. https://t.co/AtJZXHTEXQ “Of all the people who ever reached adulthood, maybe 80% of the women but only 40% of the men reproduced. Or perhaps the numbers were 60% versus 30%.”
@Fuzzy_LogicX @BoogerButtocks @sleepy_devo Not the case? Ok then. https://t.co/5xQkIxkQyn Because genetics don't change as rapidly as people like to think. We are genetically almost identical to cave people. Women getting sex is not equivalent to men get
@ReznikRina https://t.co/OcwVJ18aN5 Кількість чоловіків і жінок серед предків
@RealAdamHunt @ChrisWillx @workinprogres5 @CostelloWilliam DNA research shows humans have about half as many male ancestors as female ancestors because of unequal rates of successful procreation. About 80% of women and 40% of men historically. https://t.
gentlemen, we have done the math. over 60 percent of you throughout history did not get to reproduce. https://t.co/3k9JdtmB2u
@MSS3RosaFerreum @Scuba_On_Mars @whargarb @Oneiorosgrip @BrassVon @musa_mylove @harmonizedgrace @colttaine @okcupid Maybe that's why I was think 80%. The study I was thinking of was this one which claims it's 2:1. About 70%/30% https://t.co/zunoOZeqS3
@0xhype @Rich_Cooper This one is easy to debunk. There is a research showing that throughout history, around 40% of males have reproduced while 90% of females have left offspring. If "soul mates" weren't a fairy tale the ratio should be even. https://t.co
2. Humans have about double the female ancestors than we do men; women reproduce at higher rates than do men. https://t.co/pGHyH9UO6D https://t.co/gax1DAiWeg
@ssiemabo @cheesewhizgod @ShimminyKricket Evidently, you lack reading comprehension skills because I never stated I was discussing contemporary men. Yes, it’s anthropological reality most men who lived didn’t reproduce. https://t.co/riKU0V9nXi https://t.
@Michael08483429 @Guiltyfart Roy Baumeister, in turn, took his conclusion from this study. https://t.co/dPpvCS1y6I
@SuperInsaneGoku @UsingLyft https://t.co/Gev9Z23XHG One of many articles but it shows women's reproductive success in this particular model was 2:1. But generally the consensus debate is it varies between 40-80% reproductive success for males, but it can
@CharlesLacr0ix @JimmyDeuxFois__ @TortueNinja5363 @mat_augmente Vous prenez tous le problème à l'envers. J'avoue que les règles du jeu sont compliquées https://t.co/1GHygf2nuz
@Dr_Tasman . Badania DNA pokazują, że mamy więcej przodków damskich niż przodków męskich. To znaczy że większość kobiet z przeszłości miała potomstwo, a mężczyźni albo mieli po wiele dzieci albo nie mieli wcale. https://t.co/A99rRrqvpY https://t.co/NSS9mjY
@BenBurgis @profjennburgis 2:1 female to male reproduction rate. Estimates vary but there are clearly more female ancestors. https://t.co/PhjJdB6sz3 and https://t.co/6raO5CbqYE
RT @frankbanditi: @karanlikruya1 Konuyla ilgili J. Peterson linkteki araştırmaya dayanarak yarısı gibi bir örnek vermişti ancak oran daha d…
@karanlikruya1 Konuyla ilgili J. Peterson linkteki araştırmaya dayanarak yarısı gibi bir örnek vermişti ancak oran daha da düşükmüş demek. (12 Kural, sayfa 91) https://t.co/l29UpgiCO9
@AdamRutherford @guffynicola Human beings certainly have more female ancestors than male ancestors. Some research indicates the ratio is around 2:1. https://t.co/XhDLCwxzWc https://t.co/GEd1edt4rR
@Scientific_Bird @LucioMM1 Found it I think. https://t.co/dmT1LeLbVT
@exsinlakes @soulsweller For historical information, see this paper. It's actually a pretty serious consideration for a lot of pop gen work: https://t.co/Q1fpmA0gWP https://t.co/7VWpdRBoto
@BillyJo03584039 @trailer_parker @Grimrin @GwendolynKansen Some of us have to sleep. https://t.co/7ODAqmdJW5
The science is indeed plenty neat. Note the evidence not only for mild polygyny, but also comparably mild patrilocality and differential generation times. And, most consistent of all: sampling confusions are great hazards to blur or even reverse otherwi
That is interesting and cool!
Ok this boggles the mind a bit.
RT @gautamcgoel: TIL that you have about twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors. This seems to contradict basic arithmetic, but t…
WHAT.
TIL that you have about twice as many female ancestors as male ancestors. This seems to contradict basic arithmetic, but the science is pretty neat. #genetics https://t.co/jlPGDTXeum
@NachoLaserna182 No. ¿De verdad te crees que los hombres eligen dejar de tener sexo para jugar al LOL? Siempre ha existido esta tendencia. El 66% del ADN actual de la población humana, viene de mujeres. https://t.co/qCfgsZpWXw
@LunaTic33382591 @elonmusk @waitbutwhy Literally has nothing to do with epigenetics. This is basic evolutionary biology, not molecular genetic mechanism. However, genetic mechanism does provide the evidence for unequal effective female population, it's sti
@PCventresss 2/2Kvinner beslutter statistisk sett reproduksjon. Mennesker har dobbelt så mange kvinnelige som mannlige forfedre, dvs at alle kvinner som har levd til nå har fått 1 barn i snitt. Mens 50% av menn som har levd til nå har fått 2 barn og 50% ha
RT @TheBasedPluto: @_MsShanJ But the data shows women are procreating with the same men Even genetically throughout centuries only like 4…
@_MsShanJ But the data shows women are procreating with the same men Even genetically throughout centuries only like 40% of ever reproduced but 80% of women have but this is just hypergamy 2/3 of people's genetic ancestors are female, basically. https
Tout n’est pas simple pour les mammifères mâles ce qui pourrait expliquer certaines réactions hostiles à l’élimination du patriarcat https://t.co/WkYNPFCJfV
@Negusnegusti Sobre lo subrayado del pantallazo el artículo creo que es este https://t.co/uTkJ1E55Ai De donde lo ha sacado el autor del tuit, parece un libro y no sé cuál es.
@lmcgrew I think the resolution comes from the fact that far more women mate successfully than men, https://t.co/YtlgqNDlH9, I'm curious how this interacts with the greater male variability hypothesis
Genetic Evidence for Unequal Effective Population Sizes of Human Females and Males https://t.co/vfI1Mr5CIz
Incels, bask in the long tradition you find yourselves taking part in.
RT @Locus_of_Ctrl: @mattguttmanorg @SimonDeDeo @simpolism The (very interesting) paper that makes this claim (the DNA evidence of 2x larger…
@mattguttmanorg @SimonDeDeo @simpolism The (very interesting) paper that makes this claim (the DNA evidence of 2x larger number of effective female ancestors) https://t.co/lyn6VXph6K https://t.co/5vxnCqlSyV
@YeyoZa @gcochran99 @sciam @Horganism Actually that's not correct. Today's human population has descended from twice as many women as men. https://t.co/CRYyc5UMjv
@SpinningHugo @JohnRentoul The actual 'original research' referred to by Baumeister was, in academic form, this https://t.co/XqZ0HKugVJ
@Sargon_of_Akkad I suspect at least part of this misandry is related to the biological imperative to select against weak men: https://t.co/kr3ANghpxG
Source: https://t.co/2hZevlpXWy (h/t >> https://t.co/PCi163cF3h) https://t.co/5Ex8CfbPyN
@joerogan EVERYTHING SHOULD BE EQUALLLL https://t.co/KULSrAmEVf
Because few men reproduce with many women, 2/3 of your ancestors are female, not 1/2. Also, overall throughout... https://t.co/YdoING2gFv
#TIL that because few men reproduce with many women, 2/3 of your ancestors are female, not 1/2. Also, overall thro… https://t.co/vCny5HVUGR
Surprised to learn that we have twice as many female ancestors as male. https://t.co/tKZphupQ94
Anyone read more than one genetics paper before? http://t.co/qZcXYvoL8l (Wilder estimating half as many males reproduced.)
女性に比べて、男性は遺伝子を残せる確率が1/2なんだとか。つまり、古来より人類は、一人の男性が二人の妻をとってきた可能性。おもしろい研究です! → http://t.co/lPrAdbj6xf
イケメンはハーレム、ブサメンはぼっちなんだからそうなるだろ RT ishikun3: 女性に比べて、男性は遺伝子を残せる確率が1/2なんだとか。つまり、古来より人類は、一人の男性が二人の妻をとってきた可能性。おもしろい研究です! → http://t.co/HVaLL5AgZS
女性に比べて、男性は遺伝子を残せる確率が1/2なんだとか。つまり、古来より人類は、一人の男性が二人の妻をとってきた可能性。おもしろい研究です! → http://t.co/lPrAdbj6xf
女性に比べて、男性は遺伝子を残せる確率が1/2なんだとか。つまり、古来より人類は、一人の男性が二人の妻をとってきた可能性。おもしろい研究です! → http://t.co/lPrAdbj6xf
女性に比べて、男性は遺伝子を残せる確率が1/2なんだとか。つまり、古来より人類は、一人の男性が二人の妻をとってきた可能性。おもしろい研究です! → http://t.co/lPrAdbj6xf
女性に比べて、男性は遺伝子を残せる確率が1/2なんだとか。つまり、古来より人類は、一人の男性が二人の妻をとってきた可能性。おもしろい研究です! → http://t.co/lPrAdbj6xf
Lo dicho, la verdadera desigualdad es la reproductiva http://t.co/wWq4p6RoiC
Lo dicho, la verdadera desigualdad es la reproductiva http://t.co/wWq4p6RoiC
Lo dicho, la verdadera desigualdad es la reproductiva http://t.co/wWq4p6RoiC