@182_DuncH @RBReich There is abundant evidence that the human-caused spike in CO₂ has destabilized Earth’s climate, causing a dangerous spike in global temperature along with other effects. https://t.co/KwpGBG6gH9 https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A https://t.co/tHn
@TheSeeqer @RBReich 1) Because of the abundance of conclusive scientific evidence: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@BuffChris11 @bill_dundas @RBReich He’s right. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@jfmvaz @GoncaloAguiar Não inventei esta expressão, pode encontrar aqui por ex. https://t.co/jgDVxC6Miq Também em alguns documentos das Nações Unidas por ex. https://t.co/fDmoZZc0VZ
@PrashShukla1 @specklight Shame on you for misleading your students. I hope they find better teachers in the course of their education. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Dhraghonss @Gungnir011 @MademosVaughan @JoeBiden Follow the evidence https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@GorgeNikki @Reuters Unfortunately, it does. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@GoogleAtHome @ztaco300 I wish. It’s unhealthy and unsustainable how much time and energy I’m currently putting into outreach on Twitter. But we’re in a climate emergency and I feel a moral obligation to do what I can. So I try. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@oldandslow1961 @newsmax Nothing funny about it. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@coxashton82 @FOX59 It’s pretty relevant considering that human-caused global heating poses an existential threat to our civilization. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@bbwxsv9wth @WSJ Why bother with the non-scientist bureaucrats quoted in that image when you can see scientists present evidence directly? As in this paper: https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A https://t.co/zofNKEDoLu
@ztaco300 Evidence says otherwise. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@MikeMoo61299704 @nytimes Look at the evidence for yourself: https://t.co/KwpGBG6gH9 https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A https://t.co/Iw9ItQkkrz
@DeborahClaireUK @MikeMoo61299704 @nytimes > “There is no #ClimateCrisis” Unfortunately, there is. The evidence that proves it is succinctly summarized here: https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@DavidDDavies3 @FT Over 15,000 scientists have signed this And the paper succinctly presents the scientific evidence that we are in a climate emergency: https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@ztaco300 @StrayThread Neither of those show that human-caused climate change is not based on solid scientific evidence. Kudos to them for listening to the scientists to some extent. Here’s a summary of the scientific evidence: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Bluedra22071106 @BBCWorld That candid moment is actually encouraging. Evidence of our climate crisis are succinctly summarized here: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Dave77239226 @JuliaHB1 @BBCNews People who understand it. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@avw751 @JuliaHB1 @BBCNews Learn why so many scientists have evidence-based anxiety about human-caused global heating: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@magoniareview @matt_greener @JuliaHB1 @BBCNews Learn why scientists are so deeply concerned about human-caused global heating. Evidence summarized succinctly here: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@WilliamNaughto3 @JuliaHB1 @BBCNews Once you understand the science of it better you will know why other people are so concerned about it. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Sharla_Evans @PramilaJayapal The balance of scientific evidence shows that we are in the midst of a climate emergency. Several lines of evidence are summarized here: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@SonnyMurphy19 @PramilaJayapal No, she’s right. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@StellarCGaming @PramilaJayapal Evidence of our climate emergency is presented succinctly here: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@AliCologne @KaoHua3 Because scientific evidence shows we are in a climate emergency: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@tweetmichael7 @SkyNews > “unreasonably disrupt” They view the disruptions as reasonable because we are in a climate emergency and more of the populace needs to understand it. Evidence of our climate emergency presented here: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@A40David @withthing2 @SkyNews > “promote our little hobby horse” https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
RT @PoeBrianL: @NutureNaturally @FBE137D @Greenpeace Sounds good! Thanks for helping people understand our climate emergency! https://t.c…
@NutureNaturally @FBE137D @Greenpeace Sounds good! Thanks for helping people understand our climate emergency! https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@liestopper1984 @nowthisnews She’s right. Evidence here: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@GeorgeAston11 @cnni Because she’s right. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@herefor26202461 @cnni You have a problem with a climate activist who accurately speaks about our climate emergency? https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Cbox89 @VICE Regardless of whether or not it's dying, procreation is the act of forcing someone into existence without their consent. But yeah, it's dying (at least in regard to humans and most animal and plant species): https://t.co/N6uvbKvz8m
@lookingforfact_ @CNN Do you don’t think we should trust the scientists who study climate because is their profession and not their hobby? We can also look at the data they’ve published for ourselves. See figures 1 and 2 for a quick overview: https://t.
@MWPKGP @DineshDSouza People haven’t taken scientists seriously enough, so the protestors are trying to raise awareness. I don’t agree with their tactics in this case though. We are in a climate emergency nonetheless: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Ahkshually @DineshDSouza No, climate concerned people have looked at the evidence https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@DineshDSouza They are heroes. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@philkaiba @AdamBandt Not a lie. I’m trying to communicate what scientists have found. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
RT @PoeBrianL: @Andre154223236 @SUTONGIROTCIP @andii29 @BjornLomborg @GeorgeMonbiot If enough people learn about our climate emergency soon…
@Andre154223236 @SUTONGIROTCIP @andii29 @BjornLomborg @GeorgeMonbiot If enough people learn about our climate emergency soon enough, the ecocidal infrastructure can be dismantled by political will and collaboration. Can you help by learning and sharing wh
@Particle96 @ProudOldSoldier @AdamBandt > “There is no climate emergency” Scientific evidence are presented here. Check out the data in figures 1 and 2. All sources are cited and verifiable. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@JohnToole1 @NBCNews 15,000+ scientists have signed this open letter to humanity It presents a succinct status update of our climate emergency: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Nicro99436976 @NBCNews She has credibility because she is accurately interpreting scientific findings. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@thomashenryjr @NBCNews She’s not wrong. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@divotarebeky @NBCNews She knows what is at stake. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@gregizzo1 @Timcast Listen to the scientists directly then: https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@SamLowry27B_6 @Timcast > “vague neurotic fear” Quite specific actually, and not neurotic. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@Jdanker22 @Timcast Evidence. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@BabsiAnke @Timcast What expression would you have on your face when addressing people responsible for setting fire to your house with you in it? https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@KC4Now @Timcast She’s right. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@dustygearhead @Timcast Personal attacks on her ignored because they are petty, unsubstantiated, and useless. We should follow the scientific evidence: https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@PeterDawsonUSA @SenSanders Scientists are in broad agreement that current global heating is caused by humans burning fossil fuels, and that the consequences are dangerous. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@coopcooper41 @SenSanders This paper summarizes the evidence succinctly: https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@RealDea12127641 @SenSanders Review the evidence This paper summarizes the evidence succinctly: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Lonosa1919 @SenSanders No, he’s right. https://t.co/VAmk4FSm8A
@profjones4466 @SenSanders He’s right. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Yay_Twatters @SenSanders Evidence shows we are in a climate emergency. Here’s a status report: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@HenryOssian @JarvelinJuho 15.000 tiedemiestä ja akateemikkoa ympäri maailman vaatii samaa kuin elokapina. https://t.co/BUb1my2QJT
While many people are ridiculing the Extinction rebellion, top brains see it more clearly: https://t.co/GXB68nkUl7 @elokapina https://t.co/JQPUwAB06p
Clearly. Very few in power…are paying attention.
RT @ScienceWarning: Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to “tell it like it is.” Now…
RT @dwtruthwarrior: @RWMaloneMD Welcome to the matrix. “Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per…
RT @dwtruthwarrior: @RWMaloneMD Welcome to the matrix. “Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per…
RT @dwtruthwarrior: @RWMaloneMD Welcome to the matrix. “Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per…
RT @dwtruthwarrior: @RWMaloneMD Welcome to the matrix. “Still increasing by roughly 80 million people per year, or more than 200,000 per…
@FeralTerriHamel @RepMTG The current spike in global temperature is caused by humans, and it’s a dangerous situation for humanity and the rest of the biosphere. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@berighteous1 @kevinbacon A human-caused spike in CO₂ has destabilized Earth’s climate and it’s a very dangerous situation for humanity and the rest of the biosphere https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@jopawo @kevinbacon In many ways, yes it is https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@Popeye__Doyle @RepMTG See for yourself Evidence presented here: https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
@docohm47 @CodeNameBongo @RepMTG > “I am 58 I heard this climate BS since I was five in 1969” And here we are, at the brink, thanks to decades of inaction after scientists presented sufficient evidence. https://t.co/VAmk4FALh2
They have been warning us for decades, don’t act surprised now. #oneaday #climatecrisis #climateaction #publichealth #sustainability #decarbonization https://t.co/gTCIX0BQOM
@PopnMatters @SMFthinktank Environmental benefits of falling birthrates far outweigh any supposed economic difficulties. @guardian @andrewsparrow best to ignore (most) economists, but heed the scientists: "the world population must be stabilized — and, i
@Edward__Bernays It's not "Bill Gates shit", it's 13,900+ of the world's scientists shit: “…the world population must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity.” Signed, 13,900+ scientists https://t.c
RT @parents4future: @aktuelle_stunde Hier das Original, lesen! ▶️ https://t.co/TGleQt4Oim 😲
RT @ThierryAaron: Scientists have been increasingly trying to raise the alarm about the unfolding environmental emergency. 2/n https://t.…
@Farmer_Tom_UK @pete_ar_fryn @AHDB_BeefLamb @TheAHDB @DefraGovUK scientific consensus that to sequester and store carbon, but also to fight biodiversity collapse, we need less livestock, in particular grazing ruminants, and more forests - as confirmed for
@BBCWomansHour @LSE_ID @Emmabarnett Yes, having fewer children will help save the planet. World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency: "the world population must be stabilized — and, ideally, gradually reduced — within a framework that ensures social
RT @ScienceWarning: Scientists have a moral obligation to clearly warn humanity of any catastrophic threat and to “tell it like it is.” Now…
World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency https://t.co/rEQPoDp1CY
@johnstretch @bjames280961 @AManWithAClue @HarrietSergeant It’s consensus Mind your dunning Kruger https://t.co/71wcqrQo3k https://t.co/nlrOlZLuon https://t.co/RUA0M20PLz https://t.co/zt478VIfwX https://t.co/OfLjxJxUXU https://t.co/Ueuy64RYra htt
@Logo_Daedalus Is there a difference between scientific research and "marketing"? https://t.co/fVij1XsJzG https://t.co/LTv76eCmyi https://t.co/KXpkjR8tUE