RT @abledoc: Chinese scientists led by Ming Wang continued to publish results referencing these sequence data, which suggests they were for…
Chinese scientists led by Ming Wang continued to publish results referencing these sequence data, which suggests they were forced to delete data that was inconvenient to the official narrative. https://t.co/5JG0qMLLXx
RT @abledoc: The viruses isolated during the early phase of COVID19 in Wuhan already had 3 mutations different from its purported anteceden…
On était déjà rendu à 3 variants au début de la pandémie. (Science mag)
The viruses isolated during the early phase of COVID19 in Wuhan already had 3 mutations different from its purported antecedent which showed that considerable time had elapsed. The original data was submitted to NIH database and subsequently deleted. http
The evolutionary history of L and S lineages is in this one. And if you do what the patent says, you get two new viruses. Not saying it happened, but it is definitely possible. https://t.co/uLqIX18hBQ
@Capt_Corea On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/nAA85Vfn4L
@sea_twin @maja4185 @PeteDram There is consistent academic evidence that successive mutations have massively accelerated the spreading of SARS-CoV-2. Regarding pre-spikeD614G: https://t.co/rKuQnoMz9l https://t.co/W1R2sbsdYv Regarding the acceleration due t
@aye_lass @Beardy_WeirdyUK @PhilipProudfoot @Calumets https://t.co/7Rl0dLldiV https://t.co/s1nJCJRbqd https://t.co/6M6vvC9a3Q Tell me more about how nobody has isolated the origin strain of Covid-19
RT @DrTomFrieden: Intriguing genomic analysis suggests possibility of 2 different types of SARS-CoV-2, one more deadly and more prevalent e…
懐かしいツイートを引っ張ってくるか。俺がアンタの影武者をやって書き込んだ奴(大笑)この時点ではATF-6との相互作用を想定した🎌🤭🎌
@rubic3n @bleidl @RafaelOsswald @nanogenomic @BillyBostickson @derkauz @angoffinet @TheSeeker268 What the heck? Looking into another old article from 3rd March 2020. Pangolin CoV? The one Shi mixed in? And now the "pangolin" sequences are deleting themselv
RT @dronita_de: On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/pb60vN8cPf #DHPSP
RT @dronita_de: On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/pb60vN8cPf #DHPSP
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/pb60vN8cPf #DHPSP
RT @canchemistry: 補足:話を簡単にするため、交差免疫・交差反応性の説明は省略しています。また、インフルエンザウイルスの場合は、「中和抗体」であって「中和抗体ではない不完全な抗体」ではない、血清型が違っても「抗体依存性感染増強」が起こらないとされています。 一…
It speaks to the inextricable interconnectedness of all of us to each other; So does COVID19; i am because we are Stay safe Original https://t.co/3KSmT3AqbM Sources https://t.co/b8JxdrmntE https://t.co/Hvk7gfmWzv https://t.co/25umUPwMVw https://t.co/
RT @canchemistry: 補足:話を簡単にするため、交差免疫・交差反応性の説明は省略しています。また、インフルエンザウイルスの場合は、「中和抗体」であって「中和抗体ではない不完全な抗体」ではない、血清型が違っても「抗体依存性感染増強」が起こらないとされています。 一…
@Ahmed62071741 @El_idrissii10 كتبتي بزاف بلا فايدة. لعلمك راه كلشي تايخضع لتطور مشي غير القرودة و الانسان. انا بلا منهضر بزاف هاك ورقة علمية وحدة من بزااف تدوي على تطور كورونا. الى لقيتي ورقة علمية وحدة تتنفي تطور الفيروسات او التطور علمني عفاك https://t.
@MissCromatina Aquí hablan de un estudio con 103 cepas https://t.co/4FfQ2FQsZv
@G05Vi @lximenezfyvie @StratCons Aquí un artículo para contrastar https://t.co/6UyUHsynYK
@BarneyGimble @chenweihua @thehill It’s a tale of 2 strains, as ID’d in a study from March. A slow moving severe strain (originated in Wuhan) & a fast moving less lethal strain that seemed to inoculate against the severe side strain. https://t.co/UKV
RT @DrMooh_: Mutation in covid-19 has been reported. “The older ‘S-type’ appears to be milder and less infectious, while the ‘L-type’ which…
@HireVesuvius @CnutTheGr8 Since you persist. https://t.co/irxNeE1PDX
The actual paper is this, and it identifies the second strain as the "S-type," characterized by the mutations C8772T and T28144C: https://t.co/TrhKSV8G0i
@PrisonPlanet Exports COVID19 Diag Test 2017-18 COVID-S plandemic world is experiencing. COVID-L has both HIV & Ebola-like elements to it. CCP bioweapon? White paper: https://t.co/hmkYjSbjE5 CVL people in China video we have all seen. https://t.co
@PrisonPlanet Exports COVID19 Diag Test 2017-18 COVID-S plandemic world is experiencing. COVID-L has both HIV & Ebola-like elements to it. CCP bioweapon? White paper: https://t.co/hmkYjSbjE5 CVL people in China video we have all seen. https://t.co
@prageru Exports COVID19 Diag Test 2017-18 COVID-S plandemic world is experiencing. COVID-L has both HIV & Ebola-like elements to it. CCP bioweapon? White paper: https://t.co/hmkYjSbjE5 CVL people in China video we have all seen. https://t.co/gizZ
COVID-S what the world is experiencing. COVID-L has both HIV and Ebola-like elements to it. CCP bioweapon? White paper: https://t.co/hmkYjSbjE5 CVL people in China video we have all seen. https://t.co/gizZ4YqGzH Feb 2020 Chinese man most likely CVL. h
@HindlesKitchen @justin_hart We know to an extreme level of detail what COVID is and its relationship to other viruses. This is not even an area of debate in the scientific community. Please follow the link. https://t.co/IT95RqDmNz
@Disciple07Rock7 @robbieg430_g Evolution is directly observed (see https://t.co/3ug1PCsUb5 for example), and everything we know about biology supports common descent. You must be aware of this fact. Denial of the entire foundation of biology does you no
RT @Risitov: @JlsPro @KersausonDe Faut arrêter de faire des phrases péremptoires mensongères du style "le virus n'a jamais muté". C'est au…
@JlsPro @KersausonDe Faut arrêter de faire des phrases péremptoires mensongères du style "le virus n'a jamais muté". C'est aussi bas de plafond et café du commerce que ce que vous reprochez pourtant aux autres. 103 génomes identifiés et étudiés déjà en j
@RochatCedric @Tesseract_fr @FutEnFol @ApolloKiss @manuelOtroMundo la source que vous citez date du 10 mars 2020 https://t.co/yWaIl84MbI sur une étude du 3 mars 2020 https://t.co/4ZY6TguUrU On sait depuis que cette mutation qui a débuté et devenue dominant
@MartinaSisters @ogrecio @fvp1969 @navedelmisterio @netflix si no te importa, el alineamiento metiendo como controles las secuencias de SARSCoV, SARSCoV2 y MERS. Es que a mi un listado de GenBank no me dice nada, me gustaría ver un estudio de este tipo: h
@fvp1969 @MartinaSisters @Miss_Salmonella @navedelmisterio @netflix Creo todo lo contrario, que las evidencias existen. Qué hay mucha gente en el mundo que se dedica a esto y sabe lo que dice. Que no hay ningún interés en la ciencia por ocultar algo así, y
@RedBlueWhite_ @ogrecio @navedelmisterio @netflix @PitaMiguel no por cierto. Bajo mi punto de vista, me parece que sobra seguir dando bola a un tema que científicamente está muerto, como es el origen artificial de este virus. https://t.co/pyVHPIbd7E http
RT @Babalonhorror: #goggleup from an experienced Registered Nurse. Infection control for aireborne virus prevention by eye protection so ba…
@FormVacations since being so sick earlier this year i follow research papers https://t.co/ggzrtW6YuE
@phiyaatv @NatsMusicTeachr @VoLinxx Peer reviewed article published March and June 2020, cited over 562 times, giving known info as of March 2020. This happens over and over, plenty of skeptics, plenty of confirmations, plenty of additional later info. I
@AeonCoin @chigrl @DeItaOne Sorry...SARS/MERS not H1N1 https://t.co/4MI68ltJ4T
@RayZhang33333 Chinese authors have corroborated this. They’re not longer denying it. Natural origin in China. https://t.co/tRL6Drj8SB https://t.co/P7foq5HpXv https://t.co/0Xi4PzaQqU
@FilipeVilhena71 @CN_ @ogatopolitico Mais uma vez "appeal for authority". Vocês sabem a mínima ideia do que é modificar um vírus? Daquilo que partilhou, não passa de declarações sem qualquer sustento em evidências nem lógica. Mas deixo aqui 2 estudos cient
@cgrox06 @xiao0351 @TuckerCarlson Multiple papers state the truth: "Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus."https://t.co/sOHXCGIFkc, https://t.co/PezMmXKHws https://t.co/TlUTgh3yJX
6/ This was later reported as L/S lineages. "The L lineage (∼70%) was more prevalent than the S lineage (∼30%) in the SARS-CoV-2 viruses we examined, the S lineage was evolutionarily more related to animal coronaviruses." [They also flipped the colors] htt
@halvorz More results on strong selective pressures across SARS-CoV-2 genomes in the beginning of the pandemic, as expected regardless of origin-- https://t.co/Is2AbF4U6t More usefully, another comparison with other bat CoVs, showing again mostly low valu
@owhy3 False: Our results suggest that the development of new variations in functional sites in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike seen in SARS-CoV-2 and viruses from pangolin SARSr-CoVs are likely caused by natural selection besides recombinat
RT @oliverbeige: L = "traveler" = aggressive, prevalent in 2019, replicates slowly = the visible world S = "local" = benign, prevalent in 2…
RT @Angama_Market: S型に譲っている可能性がある、という論文がオックスフォードのナショナルサイエンスレビューに掲載された。https://t.co/RABIJoiflw
@RS_Eng_Brain @FrankfurtZack @science63424214 @Goldammerfeder @dunklesritual @Ngiyalalela @stixguru @Boris25309876 @Crunch1976_AD https://t.co/rKuQnoMz9l https://t.co/W1R2sbsdYv https://t.co/pmIqxw1yXx Lernen Sie mal den Unterschied zwischen "ein Unterschi
@dunklesritual @holmenkollin @BallouxFrancois Es gibt recht gute Forschung über die Mutationen des Virus, die besten papers kommen aus China: https://t.co/rKuQnoMz9l https://t.co/W1R2sbsdYv https://t.co/UTABotYODf Diese Forschung belegt, dass es in Wuhan m
RT @ZevShalev: NOTE: Here's where you can read the study. Yes I’m aware questions have been raised about the use of the word “aggressive"…
RT @ZevShalev: NOTE: Here's where you can read the study. Yes I’m aware questions have been raised about the use of the word “aggressive"…
@MagChange_73 @SteveCorbeil67 @sebrioux @MonChatRonfle Le contexte est différent ! Il pourrait aussi y avoir différentes souches du virus avec taux de contagion différent. Par exemple : https://t.co/j8COQfURQi
Covid-19 now exists in two forms, indicating it's already mutated at least once https://t.co/XIIEMMidUN #Covid-19
@GreySouthwick @Thomas1774Paine False, SARS-CoV-2 is a natural and unmanipulated virus derived from animal to human spillover. The evolutionary "distance" of SARS-CoV to SARS-CoV-2 is closer to 50 years. https://t.co/4WvGlSOtCl
@anayafabio compa no son mutaciones, en realidad son dos tipos de virus de la misma familia. Hasta el momento la teoría de que es una mutación del Sars no es tan clara: https://t.co/HyWU7q8BtT Sin embargo no entiendo que tiene que ver con lo de la medida
@mattjhodgkinson @Dereklowe I am not an expert in genetics and can't evaluate the quality of the arguments against Tang et al., but I find it puzzling that it was followed by many articles claiming that all variants of SARS-CoV-2 were functionally similar.
RT @cpiazzano: mas evidencia que el virus fue creado https://t.co/H553ATtPji
@Cernovich Can you please explain this to me: does it or does it not have anything to do w the current situation we are in? https://t.co/CbXQmlfXPP https://t.co/MqPCo5ig5A https://t.co/Z6qvwwugwk https://t.co/qGT9iqYoBi Then there are the norweigen scient
@mattjhodgkinson @Dereklowe Your link (April 21): "We need to know if there are nastier varieties out there and how such things might be spreading." The first Chinese papers on this topic came out at the beginning of March: https://t.co/rKuQnoMz9l Reaction
mas evidencia que el virus fue creado https://t.co/H553ATtPji
@jhorns247 @crackalac87 @Concussed_Shoe @DK_Chastaine @stltoday SARS-CoV-2 was caused by a zoonose, a disease resulting from animal-to-human transmission due to natural selection. It was not manufactured or manipulated. https://t.co/4WvGlSOtCl, https://t.
@joanneakite @TommyG Yep. Here’s the Oxford paper I mentioned. Twitter virologists have tried to downplay it, but I think we can all see that there have been at least two strains at work here. https://t.co/6ZfbcNiCTi
@MichaelTraub15 @Thomas_Binder @DrJudyAMikovits SARS-CoV-2 originated in 2019 from Wuhan. It is from a natural origin and not manipulated: https://t.co/PezMmXKHws, https://t.co/3IbbDM5Mk8
@Holly_in_CA @kingsfan42700 Hospitals are empty because they postponed elective procedures and created separate entrances. COVID-19 is not man made, since it is of natural origin. https://t.co/sOHXCGIFkc, https://t.co/4WvGlSOtCl Dr. Mikovits is a fraud and
@Opentalkuk1 @BusyDrT @DrJudyAMikovits @DrButtar @HighWireTalk @TTAVOfficial SARS-CoV-2 is not a manipulated or manmade virus. https://t.co/4WvGlSOtCl, https://t.co/sOHXCGIFkc. Dr. Mikovits is a fraud. https://t.co/hfZhKJJrsj
@booosh3000 @BrankoMilan Sounds like irony? Here is an article about covid mutations...https://t.co/HPWyHAfBO0
@TravelLightP1 @carlsmythe @AMurrayAuthor Many peer-reviewed studies have characterized the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including the nucleotide sequence. https://t.co/4WvGlSOtCl, https://t.co/sOHXCGIFkc. Dr. Mikovits is not a physician: https://t.co/7hSHRRhJ9B.
@SparrowAmerican @ColleenHuberNMD @LionelMedia Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. https://t.co/sOHXCGIFkc, https://t.co/4WvGlSOtCl
Certainly, wild animals can carry dangers diseases: COVID-19 is clearly of wildlife origin https://t.co/xgNFX7EGQa. But complicated links between owls like the Southern White-faced Scops Owl & disease warns that we shouldn't stop at convenient answers
@CNN What @CDCgov not disseminating Herd Immunity Flu Natural Occurrence https://t.co/Sdpxww897r #WuFlu mutates different strains Milder strain dominates spreads due to PEOPLE NOT SICK REMAIN SOCIAL https://t.co/isNXLGYBhM @OANN @AmericanThinker @newsmax
Really thoughtful analysis on potential impact of selection on SARS-CoV-2 from @sarperotto @troy_day and Sylvain Gandon. https://t.co/njVjGQfRqa
RT @fritsfranssen: I just learned there are at least two variations of SARS-CoV-2 in circulation. This was published in March, I missed it.…
RT @fritsfranssen: I just learned there are at least two variations of SARS-CoV-2 in circulation. This was published in March, I missed it.…
I just learned there are at least two variations of SARS-CoV-2 in circulation. This was published in March, I missed it. I wonder if this impacts on infectiousness, clinical presentation or outcome? Or vaccine development? https://t.co/KAXPYFxnEz https://t
@DreDawn3 @LeeiaLH Dr. Mikovits was not framed. https://t.co/IxE0lvBd6w, COVID-19 was not planned. https://t.co/ZNu8VxCKSn
@PaulMitchellPPC Proven: SARS-CoV-2 was a natural virus. https://t.co/ZNu8VxCKSn
RT @mattskala: @Rey_Sistance @trvrb He did, in this thread a couple weeks ago: https://t.co/hWrTzW0LC5
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 | National Science Review | Oxford Academic https://t.co/NE30aQPLSC
@Caritobustamer @yuyuniznavas Aquí hay uno de los papers científicos https://t.co/CNpEjrdllT
@ErinBromage @GChristCLE What about the L and S strains from this publication? On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/m8wicU3dXX
@CryptidWorks @MsAshleeLee @washingtonpost Genetically similar does not important direct evolutionary ancestor. Sars-cov-2 shared a common ancestors, but evidence at this point in time is that it didn't directly evolve from Sars-Cov. https://t.co/6xDmVL
Re: #coronavirus (#SARS-#CoV-2) Out of a closed cohort of 217, 128 tested #CoVID19–positive (59%), & of those, 104 (81%) were ASYMPTOMATIC. https://t.co/MZ2jUelrtx Was the lineage (clade/strain), the reportedly more prevalent, "L", or the "S"? http
@luigi_warren @_coltseavers @alimhaider @RaheemKassam This has been found in an earlier publication. The 2 sites are conserved among other related CoVs in the wild. Fig 4B https://t.co/Mtk8955oTX
@scottburke777 Click on the link and look what happens. (On the link from the link ;)) https://t.co/Q7Djq6Kz8C https://t.co/RJZWJKLqpL
RT @DrTomFrieden: 19/ The folks who know this area best tend to doubt this theory, though, and early data from a pre-print from China that…