| Title |
Metabolic Effects of Late Dinner in Healthy Volunteers—A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JCEM, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1210/clinem/dgaa354 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenjuan Gu, Nga Brereton, Amy Schweitzer, Matthew Cotter, Daisy Duan, Elisabet Børsheim, Robert R Wolfe, Luu V Pham, Vsevolod Y Polotsky, Jonathan C Jun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 566 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 12% |
| India | 30 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 20 | 4% |
| Japan | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 13 | 2% |
| Russia | 13 | 2% |
| France | 10 | 2% |
| Turkey | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 86 | 15% |
| Unknown | 278 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 449 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 66 | 12% |
| Scientists | 43 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 195 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 90 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 99 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1500. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,996
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#9
of 15,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#455
of 434,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#1
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.