↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

MetaFast: fast reference-free graph-based comparison of shotgun metagenomic data.

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 12,809)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
49 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
MetaFast: fast reference-free graph-based comparison of shotgun metagenomic data.
Published in
Bioinformatics, June 2016
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw312
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vladimir I Ulyantsev, Sergey V Kazakov, Veronika B Dubinkina, Alexander V Tyakht, Dmitry G Alexeev

Abstract

High-throughput metagenomic sequencing has revolutionized our view on the structure and metabolic potential of microbial communities. However, analysis of metagenomic composition is often complicated by the high complexity of the community and the lack of related reference genomic sequences. As a start point for comparative metagenomic analysis, the researchers require efficient means for assessing pairwise similarity of the metagenomes (beta-diversity). A number of approaches is used to address this task, however, most of them have inherent disadvantages that limit their scope of applicability. For instance, the reference-based methods poorly perform on metagenomes from previously unstudied niches, while composition-based methods appear to be too abstract for straightforward interpretation and do not allow to identify the differentially abundant features. We developed MetaFast, an approach that allows to represent a shotgun metagenome from an arbitrary environment as a modified de Bruijn graph consisting of simplified components. For multiple metagenomes, the resulting representation is used to obtain a pairwise similarity matrix. The dimensional structure of the metagenomic components preserved in our algorithm reflects the inherent subspecies-level diversity of microbiota. The method is computationally efficient and especially promising for an analysis of metagenomes from novel environmental niches. Source code and binaries are freely available for download at https://github.com/ctlab/metafast The code is written in Java and is platform independent (tested on Linux and Windows x86_64). VIU: [email protected], SVK: [email protected], VBD: [email protected], AVT: [email protected], DGA: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 96 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 26%
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 17%
Computer Science 16 15%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#392,943
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#38
of 12,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,738
of 354,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#4
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.