| Title |
Managing COVID-19 spread with voluntary public-health measures: Sweden as a case study for pandemic control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciaa864 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shina C L Kamerlin, Peter M Kasson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 9% |
| Sweden | 8 | 7% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 58 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 85 | 77% |
| Scientists | 18 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 24% |
| Unknown | 53 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 462. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#60,274
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#179
of 16,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,339
of 433,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#18
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.