↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Infanticide vs. inherited cardiac arrhythmias

Overview of attention for article published in Europace, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 3,127)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
82 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
225 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Infanticide vs. inherited cardiac arrhythmias
Published in
Europace, November 2020
DOI 10.1093/europace/euaa272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malene Brohus, Todor Arsov, David A Wallace, Helene Halkjær Jensen, Mette Nyegaard, Lia Crotti, Marcin Adamski, Yafei Zhang, Matt A Field, Vicki Athanasopoulos, Isabelle Baró, Bárbara B Ribeiro de Oliveira-Mendes, Richard Redon, Flavien Charpentier, Hariharan Raju, Deborah DiSilvestre, Jinhong Wei, Ruiwu Wang, Haloom Rafehi, Antony Kaspi, Melanie Bahlo, Ivy E Dick, Sui Rong Wayne Chen, Matthew C Cook, Carola G Vinuesa, Michael Toft Overgaard, Peter J Schwartz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 225 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 18 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Unspecified 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 19 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 808. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#23,687
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#1
of 3,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#916
of 526,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.