The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Accelerated Diversification Explains the Exceptional Species Richness of Tropical Characoid Fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Biology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/sysbio/syab040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno F Melo, Brian L Sidlauskas, Thomas J Near, Fabio F Roxo, Ava Ghezelayagh, Luz E Ochoa, Melanie L J Stiassny, Jairo Arroyave, Jonathan Chang, Brant C Faircloth, Daniel J MacGuigan, Richard C Harrington, Ricardo C Benine, Michael D Burns, Kendra Hoekzema, Natalia C Sanches, Javier A Maldonado-Ocampo, Ricardo M C Castro, Fausto Foresti, Michael E Alfaro, Claudio Oliveira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 23% |
| Brazil | 7 | 5% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 51% |
| Scientists | 64 | 48% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2024.
All research outputs
#553,393
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#33
of 1,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,810
of 464,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.