| Title |
Effects of sample collection and storage methods on fecal bacterial diversity in California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalogy, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jmammal/gyad057 |
| Authors |
Erin S Person, Kianna P von Maydell, Jada E Baldoza, Eileen A Lacey, Jennifer E Smith |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,456,200
of 23,963,552 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#604
of 3,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,336
of 182,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,963,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.