The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Reproduction Update, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1093/humupd/dmad028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bart C J M Fauser, G David Adamson, Jacky Boivin, Georgina M Chambers, Christian de Geyter, Silke Dyer, Marcia C Inhorn, Lone Schmidt, Gamal I Serour, Basil Tarlatzis, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Oladapo Ashiru, Simon Brown, Karianne Bye, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Barbara Collura, Petra De Sutter, Luca Gianaroli, Linda Giudice, Osamu Ishihara, Edgar V Mocanu, Willem Ombelet, Rishma Pai, Guido Pennings, James Raymer, Hugh Taylor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 69% |
| Scientists | 8 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#310,941
of 26,526,336 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction Update
#29
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,993
of 387,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction Update
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,336 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them