Title |
Extension rates across the northern Shanxi Grabens, China, from Quaternary geology, seismicity and geodesy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geophysical Journal International, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1093/gji/ggx031 |
Authors |
Timothy A. Middleton, John R. Elliott, Edward J. Rhodes, Sarah Sherlock, Richard T. Walker, Weitao Wang, Jingxing Yu, Yu Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 30% |
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 45% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Philosophy | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,933,645
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Journal International
#680
of 3,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,167
of 419,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Journal International
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.