↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Expression of nonclassical class I molecules by intestinal epithelial cells

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Expression of nonclassical class I molecules by intestinal epithelial cells
Published in
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/ibd.20026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilani Perera, Ling Shao, Anjlee Patel, Kelly Evans, Bertrand Meresse, Richard Blumberg, Daniel Geraghty, Veronika Groh, Thomas Spies, Bana Jabri, Lloyd Mayer

Abstract

It is well recognized that the nature of the immune response is different in the intestinal tract than in peripheral lymphoid organs. The immunologic tone of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue is one of suppression rather than active immunity, distinguishing pathogens from normal flora. Failure to control mucosal immune responses may lead to inflammatory diseases such as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and celiac disease. It has been suggested that this normally immunosuppressed state may relate to unique antigen-presenting cells and unique T-cell populations. The intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) has been proposed to act as a nonprofessional antigen-presenting cell (APC). Previous studies have suggested that antigens presented by IECs result in the activation a CD8(+) regulatory T-cell subset in a nonclassical MHC I molecule restricted manner. We therefore analyzed the expression of nonclassical MHC I molecules by normal IECs and compared this to those expressed by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) IECs. Normal surface IEC from the colon and, to a much lesser extent, the small bowel express nonclassical MHC I molecules on their surface. In contrast, mRNA is expressed in all intestinal epithelial cells. Surface IEC express CD1d, MICA/B, and HLA-E protein. In contrast, crypt IECs express less or no nonclassical MHC I molecules but do express mRNA for these molecules. Furthermore, the regulation of expression of distinct nonclassical class I molecules is different depending on the molecule analyzed. Interestingly, IECs derived from patients with UC fail to express any nonclassical MHC I molecules (protein and HLA-E mRNA). IECs from CD patients express HLA-E and MICA/B comparable to that seen in normal controls but fail to express CD1d. Thus, in UC there may be a failure to activate any nonclassical MHC I molecule restricted regulatory T cells that may result in unopposed active inflammatory responses. In CD only the CD1d-regulated T cells would be affected.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Unknown 72 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
#1,752
of 3,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,648
of 173,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
#94
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.