↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

The intricate network between the p34 and p44 subunits is central to the activity of the transcription/DNA repair factor TFIIH

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
The intricate network between the p34 and p44 subunits is central to the activity of the transcription/DNA repair factor TFIIH
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkx743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Radu, Elisabeth Schoenwetter, Cathy Braun, Julien Marcoux, Wolfgang Koelmel, Dominik R. Schmitt, Jochen Kuper, Sarah Cianférani, Jean M. Egly, Arnaud Poterszman, Caroline Kisker

Abstract

The general transcription factor IIH (TFIIH) is a multi-protein complex and its 10 subunits are engaged in an intricate protein-protein interaction network critical for the regulation of its transcription and DNA repair activities that are so far little understood on a molecular level. In this study, we focused on the p44 and the p34 subunits, which are central for the structural integrity of core-TFIIH. We solved crystal structures of a complex formed by the p34 N-terminal vWA and p44 C-terminal zinc binding domains from Chaetomium thermophilum and from Homo sapiens. Intriguingly, our functional analyses clearly revealed the presence of a second interface located in the C-terminal zinc binding region of p34, which can rescue a disrupted interaction between the p34 vWA and the p44 RING domain. In addition, we demonstrate that the C-terminal zinc binding domain of p34 assumes a central role with respect to the stability and function of TFIIH. Our data reveal a redundant interaction network within core-TFIIH, which may serve to minimize the susceptibility to mutational impairment. This provides first insights why so far no mutations in the p34 or p44 TFIIH-core subunits have been identified that would lead to the hallmark nucleotide excision repair syndromes xeroderma pigmentosum or trichothiodystrophy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,477,045
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#22,340
of 26,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,595
of 316,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#216
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.