↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

The association between the 5-HTTLPR and neural correlates of fear conditioning and connectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
The association between the 5-HTTLPR and neural correlates of fear conditioning and connectivity
Published in
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.1093/scan/nsu108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Klucken, Jan Schweckendiek, Carlo Blecker, Bertram Walter, Yvonne Kuepper, Juergen Hennig, Rudolf Stark

Abstract

Strong evidence links the 5-HTTLPR genotype to the modulation of amygdala reactivity, which is considered to convey the increased vulnerability for anxiety disorders in s-allele carriers. In addition to amygdala reactivity, the 5-HTTLPR has been shown to be related to alterations in structural and effective connectivity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 5-HTTLPR genotype on amygdala reactivity and effective connectivity during fear conditioning, as well as structural connectivity (as measured by diffusion tensor imaging). In order to integrate different classification strategies, we used the bi-allelic (s-allele vs. l/l-allele group) as well as the tri-allelic (low-functioning vs. high-functioning) classification approach. S-allele carriers showed exaggerated amygdala reactivity and elevated amygdala-insula coupling during fear conditioning (CS+ > CS-) compared with the l/l-allele group. In addition, DTI analysis showed increased FA-values in s-allele carriers within the uncinate fasciculus. approach, increased amygdala reactivity and amygdala insula coupling were observed in the low-functioning compared the high-functioning group. No significant differences between the two groups were found in structural connectivity. The present results add to the current debate on the influence of the 5-HTTLPR on brain functioning. These differences between s-allele and l/l-allele carriers may CONTRIBUTE: to altered vulnerability for psychiatric disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 32%
Neuroscience 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,382,053
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#948
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,129
of 247,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.