↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Inefficient Replication of Listeria innocua in the Cytosol of Mammalian Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Inefficient Replication of Listeria innocua in the Cytosol of Mammalian Cells
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, January 2004
DOI 10.1086/381206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg Slaghuis, Monika Goetz, Fredi Engelbrecht, Werner Goebel

Abstract

The efficiency of adherence to, internalization by, and replication in the cytosol of J774 macrophages and HEp-2 epithelial cells was compared between a nonspreading Listeria monocytogenes actA mutant and L. innocua. The studied L. innocua strains were equipped either with listeriolysin alone or with listeriolysin O (LLO) and the recently identified hexose-phosphate transporter of L. monocytogenes. All listerial strains expressed green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the PrfA-dependent actA promoter. GFP expression was observed exclusively in the cytosol of host cells. Escape from the phagosome of LLO-expressing L. innocua strains was as efficient as that from L. monocytogenes. hpt-positive L. innocua showed significantly enhanced adherence to HEp-2 cells, but internalization was only slightly increased, compared with hpt-negative L. innocua. Subsequent replication of L. monocytogenes in the cytosol of the host cells proceeded within the next 6 h in most infected host cells, with a generation time <40 min. L. innocua prfA hly replicated more slowly (with a generation time of 60-90 min), and, in most host cells, bacterial replication stopped after 2-3 rounds of replication. In some cells, bacterial replication did not occur. Twenty-four hours after infection, the majority of J774 cells (>90%) infected with L. monocytogenes actA were dead, whereas most host cells infected with L. innocua were still alive. L. innocua equipped with the prfA, hly, and hpt genes of L. monocytogenes did not show significantly increased cytosolic replication, which indicates that expression of this sugar phosphate uptake system is not sufficient for extensive listerial replication in the cytosol of host cells.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Researcher 7 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#7,166
of 14,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,807
of 147,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#37
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.