Title |
Nature Divided, Scientists United: US–Mexico Border Wall Threatens Biodiversity and Binational Conservation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioScience, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biy063 |
Authors |
Robert Peters, William J Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Matthew Moskwik, Gerardo Carreón-Arroyo, Gerardo Ceballos, Ana Córdova, Rodolfo Dirzo, Paul R Ehrlich, Aaron D Flesch, Rurik List, Thomas E Lovejoy, Reed F Noss, Jesús Pacheco, José K Sarukhán, Michael E Soulé, Edward O Wilson, Jennifer R B Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 456 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 192 | 42% |
United Kingdom | 17 | 4% |
Canada | 16 | 4% |
Mexico | 9 | 2% |
Germany | 4 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Ireland | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 2 | <1% |
Other | 16 | 4% |
Unknown | 193 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 391 | 86% |
Scientists | 37 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 23 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 17 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1538. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,238
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#6
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131
of 335,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.