↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Spatiotemporal Patterns and Diffusion of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in British India

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Spatiotemporal Patterns and Diffusion of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in British India
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, September 2018
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwy209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivia Reyes, Elizabeth C Lee, Pratha Sah, Cécile Viboud, Siddharth Chandra, Shweta Bansal

Abstract

The factors that drive spatial heterogeneity and diffusion of pandemic influenza remain debated. Here, we characterize the spatio-temporal mortality patterns of the 1918 influenza pandemic in British India and study the role of demographic factors, environmental variables, and mobility processes on the observed patterns of spread. We analyze fever and all-cause excess mortality across 206 districts in India during the period of January 1916 to December 1920, and control for variation in seasonality particular to India. Our analysis reveals that the 1918 autumn wave in India matches signature features of influenza pandemics with high disease burden among young adults, (moderate) spatial heterogeneity in burden, and highly synchronized outbreaks across the country deviating from annual seasonality. Importantly, we also find that population density and rainfall explain the spatial variation in excess mortality, and that long-distance travel via railroad is predictive of the observed spatial diffusion of disease. Our work integrates a spatio-temporal analysis of mortality patterns during the 1918 influenza pandemic in India with data on underlying factors and processes to reveal transmission mechanisms in a large, intensely connected setting with significant climatic variability. The characterization of such heterogeneity during historical pandemics is crucial to our ability to prepare for future pandemics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Social Sciences 8 14%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 358. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#75,482
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#73
of 9,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,635
of 341,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#4
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.