| Title |
A general aerosol-assisted biosynthesis of functional bulk nanocomposites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
National Science Review, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1093/nsr/nwy144 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qing-Fang Guan, Zi-Meng Han, Tong-Tong Luo, Huai-Bin Yang, Hai-Wei Liang, Si-Ming Chen, Guang-Sheng Wang, Shu-Hong Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#800,697
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from National Science Review
#92
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,943
of 437,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from National Science Review
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.