| Title |
Ossified blood vessels in primary familial brain calcification elicit a neurotoxic astrocyte response
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/brain/awz032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yvette Zarb, Ulrike Weber-Stadlbauer, Daniel Kirschenbaum, Diana Rita Kindler, Juliet Richetto, Daniel Keller, Rosa Rademakers, Dennis W Dickson, Andreas Pasch, Tatiana Byzova, Khayrun Nahar, Fabian F Voigt, Fritjof Helmchen, Andreas Boss, Adriano Aguzzi, Jan Klohs, Annika Keller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Serbia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 12 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,542,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#2,581
of 7,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,116
of 354,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#64
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.