↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Article Metrics

Analysis of Spounaviruses as a Case Study for the Overdue Reclassification of Tailed Phages

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Biology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
55 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of Spounaviruses as a Case Study for the Overdue Reclassification of Tailed Phages
Published in
Systematic Biology, May 2019
DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syz036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakub Barylski, François Enault, Bas E Dutilh, Margo BP Schuller, Robert A Edwards, Annika Gillis, Jochen Klumpp, Petar Knezevic, Mart Krupovic, Jens H Kuhn, Rob Lavigne, Hanna M Oksanen, Matthew B Sullivan, Ho Bin Jang, Peter Simmonds, Pakorn Aiewsakun, Johannes Wittmann, Igor Tolstoy, J Rodney Brister, Andrew M Kropinski, Evelien M Adriaenssens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 13%
Engineering 4 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 35 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#815,759
of 21,196,061 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#92
of 1,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,824
of 287,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,196,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.