↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Analysis of Spounaviruses as a Case Study for the Overdue Reclassification of Tailed Phages

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Biology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
52 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of Spounaviruses as a Case Study for the Overdue Reclassification of Tailed Phages
Published in
Systematic Biology, May 2019
DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syz036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakub Barylski, François Enault, Bas E Dutilh, Margo BP Schuller, Robert A Edwards, Annika Gillis, Jochen Klumpp, Petar Knezevic, Mart Krupovic, Jens H Kuhn, Rob Lavigne, Hanna M Oksanen, Matthew B Sullivan, Ho Bin Jang, Peter Simmonds, Pakorn Aiewsakun, Johannes Wittmann, Igor Tolstoy, J Rodney Brister, Andrew M Kropinski, Evelien M Adriaenssens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 25%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 15%
Engineering 4 3%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 43 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,171,144
of 25,981,448 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#121
of 1,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,228
of 366,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,981,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.