| Title |
Analysis of Spounaviruses as a Case Study for the Overdue Reclassification of Tailed Phages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Biology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/sysbio/syz036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jakub Barylski, François Enault, Bas E Dutilh, Margo BP Schuller, Robert A Edwards, Annika Gillis, Jochen Klumpp, Petar Knezevic, Mart Krupovic, Jens H Kuhn, Rob Lavigne, Hanna M Oksanen, Matthew B Sullivan, Ho Bin Jang, Peter Simmonds, Pakorn Aiewsakun, Johannes Wittmann, Igor Tolstoy, J Rodney Brister, Andrew M Kropinski, Evelien M Adriaenssens |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
| Australia | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 29 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 24 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 24% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 21 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,043,801
of 24,039,735 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#118
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,058
of 353,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,039,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.