↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Article Metrics

Retraction of ‘Interposed abdominal compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac surgery’ [Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2014;19:985-989]

Overview of attention for article published in Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 1,543)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Retraction of ‘Interposed abdominal compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac surgery’ [Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2014;19:985-989]
Published in
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 2019
DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivz200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-ke Li, Jun Wang, Tian-fa Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,909,997
of 13,516,269 outputs
Outputs from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
#33
of 1,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,633
of 164,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.