| Title |
Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ajcn/nqz298 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel A Martínez-González, Cesar I Fernandez-Lazaro, Estefanía Toledo, Andrés Díaz-López, Dolores Corella, Albert Goday, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J Alfredo Martínez, Luís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, Francisco J Tinahones, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A Tur, José López-Miranda, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Olga Portoles, María Soria-Florido, Jadwiga Konieczna, Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, José C Fernández-García, Itziar Abete, Patricia Henríquez-Sánchez, Araceli Muñoz-Garach, José M Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Rocío Barragán, Olga Castañer, Miquel Fiol, Manoli García de la Hera, María C Belló-Mora, Alfredo Gea, Nancy Babio, Montse Fitó, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Itziar Zazpe, Jordi Salas-Salvadó |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 46% |
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 230 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 23% |
| Unknown | 82 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 99 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#539,541
of 24,189,858 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,231
of 12,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,780
of 458,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#11
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,189,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.