↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Article Metrics

Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Carbohydrate quality changes and concurrent changes in cardiovascular risk factors: a longitudinal analysis in the PREDIMED-Plus randomized trial
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2019
DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqz298
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel A Martínez-González, Cesar I Fernandez-Lazaro, Estefanía Toledo, Andrés Díaz-López, Dolores Corella, Albert Goday, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J Alfredo Martínez, Luís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, Francisco J Tinahones, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A Tur, José López-Miranda, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Olga Portoles, María Soria-Florido, Jadwiga Konieczna, Eva M Navarrete-Muñoz, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, José C Fernández-García, Itziar Abete, Patricia Henríquez-Sánchez, Araceli Muñoz-Garach, José M Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Rocío Barragán, Olga Castañer, Miquel Fiol, Manoli García de la Hera, María C Belló-Mora, Alfredo Gea, Nancy Babio, Montse Fitó, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Itziar Zazpe, Jordi Salas-Salvadó

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 22%
Unspecified 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 23 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2020.
All research outputs
#458,403
of 16,540,981 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,147
of 11,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,924
of 383,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#10
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,540,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.