| Title |
A draft genome sequence of the elusive giant squid, Architeuthis dux
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/gigascience/giz152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rute R da Fonseca, Alvarina Couto, Andre M Machado, Brona Brejova, Carolin B Albertin, Filipe Silva, Paul Gardner, Tobias Baril, Alex Hayward, Alexandre Campos, Ângela M Ribeiro, Inigo Barrio-Hernandez, Henk-Jan Hoving, Ricardo Tafur-Jimenez, Chong Chu, Barbara Frazão, Bent Petersen, Fernando Peñaloza, Francesco Musacchia, Graham C Alexander, Hugo Osório, Inger Winkelmann, Oleg Simakov, Simon Rasmussen, M Ziaur Rahman, Davide Pisani, Jakob Vinther, Erich Jarvis, Guojie Zhang, Jan M Strugnell, L Filipe C Castro, Olivier Fedrigo, Mateus Patricio, Qiye Li, Sara Rocha, Agostinho Antunes, Yufeng Wu, Bin Ma, Remo Sanges, Tomas Vinar, Blagoy Blagoev, Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten, Rasmus Nielsen, M Thomas P Gilbert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 9% |
| Spain | 9 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | 4% |
| Denmark | 5 | 3% |
| Austria | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 101 | 55% |
| Scientists | 78 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 516. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#47,511
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#2
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,092
of 468,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.