↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

A draft genome sequence of the elusive giant squid, Architeuthis dux

Overview of attention for article published in Giga Science, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,229)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
183 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
A draft genome sequence of the elusive giant squid, Architeuthis dux
Published in
Giga Science, January 2020
DOI 10.1093/gigascience/giz152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rute R da Fonseca, Alvarina Couto, Andre M Machado, Brona Brejova, Carolin B Albertin, Filipe Silva, Paul Gardner, Tobias Baril, Alex Hayward, Alexandre Campos, Ângela M Ribeiro, Inigo Barrio-Hernandez, Henk-Jan Hoving, Ricardo Tafur-Jimenez, Chong Chu, Barbara Frazão, Bent Petersen, Fernando Peñaloza, Francesco Musacchia, Graham C Alexander, Hugo Osório, Inger Winkelmann, Oleg Simakov, Simon Rasmussen, M Ziaur Rahman, Davide Pisani, Jakob Vinther, Erich Jarvis, Guojie Zhang, Jan M Strugnell, L Filipe C Castro, Olivier Fedrigo, Mateus Patricio, Qiye Li, Sara Rocha, Agostinho Antunes, Yufeng Wu, Bin Ma, Remo Sanges, Tomas Vinar, Blagoy Blagoev, Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten, Rasmus Nielsen, M Thomas P Gilbert

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 22%
Computer Science 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 47 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 515. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#53,480
of 26,736,789 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#1
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,246
of 485,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,736,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.