@merkler1 Further is better. There's a handy review here: https://t.co/yztUyfNr9u
#COVID19 travels in EXHALED DROPLETS sized 0.1 - 5μm and above: https://t.co/IwL6kwpJ1X https://t.co/WpLozhYBa3 https://t.co/T9YsSNUUtt FORTUNATELY, MASKS CAN FILTER THESE DROPLET SIZES (> 0.1μm) Cloth: https://t.co/UNkLtBdXGO N95/N99: https:
@FaheemYounus https://t.co/sdYj1ILbcM https://t.co/wQLpxYeTfD CDC recommendations is airborne precautions. Studies find the virus lingering in air hours after.
Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating COVID-19? - PubMed https://t.co/N3EV6wKSTS
@mauricedehond Het kiezen van 1,5 meter in een bandbreedte van 1 tot 8 meter uit honderden onderzoeken is moeilijk. Zou goed zijn als er wat meer transparantie zou zijn over het besluitvormingsproces en soms ontbreken hard bewijs. "Bewijs" dat er geen bewi
Waarom 1,5 meter? En geen 1,2 of zelfs 8 meter? Deze paper gebaseerd op 393 papers zocht het antwoord. #Op1 #anderhalvemeter @mauricedehond https://t.co/stdFNR8rYM
"The weight of combined evidence supports airborne precautions for the occupational health and safety of health workers treating patients with COVID-19." Munskydd är inte skyddsutrustning! @Arbetsmiljo @Folkhalsomynd @komarb @vardforbundet @FacketKommunal
@JohannaWester4 @zin_zah @bjornsing @jukka235 @TallinkSilja @vikingline_fi @HeikkiRay Nope.. Spread through air is the driving force. https://t.co/wPmpG3WUEd Surfaces are only 20% (there is no studies washing hands protects from covid) Breathing in viru
@Guswir6 @danielf1117 @JennyJusuf Bro, meskipun masih terus dikembangkan, sudah ada beberapa penelitian yg menyatakan virus ini dapat dideteksi di udara. Searching aja di web jurnal. Nih salah satunya https://t.co/gy94uPVENm Banyakin baca ya Bro.
Here's more evidence why flimsy mask are not effective against a SARS virus. This research makes the number of CV cases quite suspicious when during BLM protest numbers are up but not for protest abt opening up the economy. CV19 is a BLM targeting virus.
@ThomLaPorte @KHOU Can you not see what is being mandated makes no sense even before doing research for a SARS virus? READ PLEASE: Moreover, evidence suggests that infections cannot neatly be separated into the dichotomy of droplet versus airborne transm
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
RT @hazardseditor: Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6…
Two metres is not enough: "Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6 feet), in some cases up to 8 meters (≈26 feet)" - Journal of Infectious Diseases https://t.co/d0dcZxudw7
Shop until you droplet? UK shops now open. Read watch and decide for yourself. https://t.co/IzGxeU8NMd https://t.co/VUZ16GI7MC https://t.co/maTcy1TTds https://t.co/neEOLuuOA6 https://t.co/h7tImp0Kxt https://t.co/4E9b40C1PS https://t.co/wpF5tiOGwB https:/
Shop till you drop? UK shops open. Available studies also show that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in the air, and remain viable 3 hours after aerosolization. https://t.co/neEOLuMpYG
Educate yourself #COVID19Pandemic Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019? https://t.co/QYuRMeVykg
Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019? Prateek Bahl et al (2020). The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://t.co/2bC0xkL8hn https://t.co/2z2auocPqV
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
@jordi_a @eldiarioes En fin ... https://t.co/7VX3C6vRp2
RT @Lisa5651: I am hoping to spread this information. So many people are having parties and gathering with no mask, no distance. Why would…
While the safe distance is debatable as shown by different studies, wearing mask is most useful in keeping ourselves safe without any conflict (I hope). The type and material of mask can debatable for common people.
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @mariaitapia: @EnfrmraSaturada Han pactado aceptar un riesgo mayor. Está claro que corremos más riesgo cuanto más cerca estemos de la f…
RT @mariaitapia: @EnfrmraSaturada Han pactado aceptar un riesgo mayor. Está claro que corremos más riesgo cuanto más cerca estemos de la f…
@EnfrmraSaturada Han pactado aceptar un riesgo mayor. Está claro que corremos más riesgo cuanto más cerca estemos de la fuente infecciosa. Pero la distancia de seguridad de 2 m no es una barrera mágica. De hecho, las gotas respiratorias llegan más allá
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
I am hoping to spread this information. So many people are having parties and gathering with no mask, no distance. Why would someone do that?
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @RFanciola: Therefore, wear masks!
RT @QuimSegales: La ciencia progresa cada día y los nuevos datos indican que probablemente estas gotículas pueden ir más allá de 2 metros.…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @QuimSegales: La ciencia progresa cada día y los nuevos datos indican que probablemente estas gotículas pueden ir más allá de 2 metros.…
La ciencia progresa cada día y los nuevos datos indican que probablemente estas gotículas pueden ir más allá de 2 metros. Pero no es solo hasta donde llegan las gotas sino si una carga de #SARSCoV2 suficiente para infectar puede llegar más allá de la dista
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
Airborne or droplet precautions for health workers treating COVID-19? https://t.co/eAE7QuRTvd
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @VVuorinenAalto: Mielenkiintoinen kokoelma. Mutta ei vain etäisyys vaan myös aika joka altistutaan. Jos pitoisuus puolittuu niin 100 pa…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @VVuorinenAalto: Mielenkiintoinen kokoelma. Mutta ei vain etäisyys vaan myös aika joka altistutaan. Jos pitoisuus puolittuu niin 100 pa…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @VVuorinenAalto: Mielenkiintoinen kokoelma. Mutta ei vain etäisyys vaan myös aika joka altistutaan. Jos pitoisuus puolittuu niin 100 pa…
RT @Neuro24de: SARS-CoV-2 sind 3 Stunden nach der Aerosolisierung in der Luft nachweisbar. Der Sicherheitsabstand von 2m ist zu kurz, Maske…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
6 feet not safe ??? Studies seem to suggest so....
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…