RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
And the gov want to reduce the 2m... fecking hell.
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
AY!!!!!!!!!!!!
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @VVuorinenAalto: Mielenkiintoinen kokoelma. Mutta ei vain etäisyys vaan myös aika joka altistutaan. Jos pitoisuus puolittuu niin 100 pa…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
Mielenkiintoinen kokoelma. Mutta ei vain etäisyys vaan myös aika joka altistutaan. Jos pitoisuus puolittuu niin 100 partikkelin hengittämisen kuluva aika tuplaantuu. @THLorg @HUS_uutisoi
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
SARS-CoV-2 sind 3 Stunden nach der Aerosolisierung in der Luft nachweisbar. Der Sicherheitsabstand von 2m ist zu kurz, Masken, Lüften, Testen ist weiter angesagt. Vorsichtsmaßnahmen müssen Aerosole berücksichtigen. https://t.co/dOCv9a0RIP
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
oh no. based on this, proper social distancing should be 10-15 ft. this is why masks are so crucial
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
Oops. (Back off a little further?)
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
My rule of thumb would be: treat droplets from an infected person in the same way you would treat "smoke" from a person vaping. If you can smell vaping, then you are being too close.
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
RT @linseymarr: Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft)…
Systematic review on how far droplets travel https://t.co/AeKga3TrKV "available data do not support the 1 – 2 m (≈3 – 6 ft) rule of spatial separation. Of ten studies on horizontal droplet distance, eight showed droplets travel more than 2 m" https://t.co/
We did not identify robust data to inform these aspects. ???? https://t.co/neEOLuMpYG https://t.co/KSRtSN4USA https://t.co/VUZ16GqwV4 https://t.co/78T7UGKwD5 https://t.co/iQI8PVnyuj
If aerosolising procedures are done, and environmental factors such as ventilation, might all affect the degree of protection afforded by personal protection strategies, but we did not identify robust data to inform these aspects. https://t.co/neEOLuMpYG h
Munskydd är inte PPE "The weight of combined evidence supports airborne precautions for the occupational health and safety of health workers treating patients with COVID-19." https://t.co/1uZdtFxy4G
In general, recent studies show distances reached by potentially pathogen-laden droplets of a continuum of sizes to be far greater than 2 meters (≈6 feet) therefore, the probability of infection well beyond the defined risk limit can be significant. http
It is timely to review the evidence informing the 1- to 2-meter (≈3–6 feet) rule of infection control, which drives guidelines for droplet precautions. Most studies of horizontal transmission of droplets show distances of greater than 2 meters (≈6 feet) ht
Available studies also show that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in the air, and remain viable 3 hours after aerosolization. https://t.co/neEOLuMpYG
The available data do not support the 1- to 2-meter (≈3–6 feet) rule of spatial separation. Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8 showed droplets travel more than 2 meters (≈6 feet), in some cases up to 8 meters (≈26 feet). https://t.co/neEOLuMpY
Aerosols of covid-19 airborne transmission https://t.co/RfFx4R996O https://t.co/7f3Uk0AzHM https://t.co/OQyWYyRKhj
@CaccioppoliMike @PatTheBerner You are wrong https://t.co/MHzauNKNRp
@Isobelwilson8 @InquisitiveMi14 @WelshGovernment Airborne droplets can travel 4-8m https://t.co/hRG9Hn0h0o Coronavirus can travel on airborne pollution particles https://t.co/9nUmELonB9
@DavidP_private 16 d'abril: https://t.co/sLQ73yYjGj
@kenpcg @OwainEvans_UK @DrZoeHyde @StefanFSchubert Referring to this paper I assume? Thanks a lot! https://t.co/HIqrRI6VYv
😱🤔
@UKHospKate @LesterPyatt @SLLPOnline @PaulRChase @PeterBorgNeal @OakmanInns "the evidence base for current guidelines is sparse, and the available data do not support the 1-2-meter rule of spatial separation. Of 10 studies on horizontal droplet distance, 8
@hen99 @DoctorKarl Fart pong is from gases like hydrogen sulfide, which is not a particulate & will pass through even N95/P2 filters, while a virus will not. The 2m guidance is very old but WHO still uses it. MIT researchers have found droplets can tra
RT @MGlasius: Denmark is slowly re-opening, and the authorities have just decided that a distance of 1 m (instead of 2 m) between people is…
RT @GuImbriaco: The recent data on SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital ward shows a distance traveled by the virus of at least 4 meters double the ass…
RT @GuImbriaco: The recent data on SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital ward shows a distance traveled by the virus of at least 4 meters double the ass…
The recent data on SARS-CoV-2 in a hospital ward shows a distance traveled by the virus of at least 4 meters double the assumed safe distance @19criticalcare @Aniarti_ #icunursing #weareintensivecare https://t.co/4wFBgRGVip
@ChristosArgyrop @Tom_NE1R @zerg90 @CDCgov @WHO Long and somewhat tedious paper, but you might find of interest. H/t @RichardLehman1 https://t.co/Y0gZs5i6wD
RT @mariaitapia: Sobre la distancia de seguridad de 1 a 2 metros: "Encontramos que la base [científica] para las pautas actuales es escasa…
RT @linseymarr: Thorough review showing that respiratory droplets travel more than 6 feet. https://t.co/LYRxw9F659 In general, risk decreas…
Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019? https://t.co/ZO8u0TT7fG
RT @linseymarr: Thorough review showing that respiratory droplets travel more than 6 feet. https://t.co/LYRxw9F659 In general, risk decreas…
RT @MGlasius: Denmark is slowly re-opening, and the authorities have just decided that a distance of 1 m (instead of 2 m) between people is…
RT @MGlasius: Denmark is slowly re-opening, and the authorities have just decided that a distance of 1 m (instead of 2 m) between people is…
@DavidJuurlink @uoftmedicine I think we still don't really know. https://t.co/7Er3avJO2Q
RT @linseymarr: Thorough review showing that respiratory droplets travel more than 6 feet. https://t.co/LYRxw9F659 In general, risk decreas…
RT @MGlasius: Denmark is slowly re-opening, and the authorities have just decided that a distance of 1 m (instead of 2 m) between people is…
Denmark is slowly re-opening, and the authorities have just decided that a distance of 1 m (instead of 2 m) between people is fine. Face-masks are not required nor used here. This will be an "interesting" experiment! Do not expect to see me at the mall wh
@danladbury Absolutely Dan. There is growing evidence that droplets can spend time in the air. Masks help. But just best if we don't spend time near pre-symtomatic persons. This needs innovation and thinking from the bottom up not top down. #agilethinking
Don’t be so sure that aerosolisation isn’t occurring. That means for surgical procedures too.
RT @linseymarr: Thorough review showing that respiratory droplets travel more than 6 feet. https://t.co/LYRxw9F659 In general, risk decreas…
RT @biofilmjimmy: these droplets do travel 6ft, this is why we have 2m social distancing in the UK - this is not new news and thankfully pr…
@MirKraszewski @DBienkiewicz @DorotaPodlesna To są tylko pańskie dywagacje. Wszystko można znaleść w opracowaniach i wynikach badań👇Ja przedstawiłam kilka, pan nie przedstawił żadnego. Dlatego pytam gdzie i z jakim zespołem prowadzi pan swoje prace badawc