World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice
BioScience, November 2017
William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Mauro Galetti, Mohammed Alamgir, Eileen Crist, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud, William F. Laurance
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,880 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||7504||85%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||211||2%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||113||1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||300||18%|
|Student > Master||255||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||174||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||83||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||419||25%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||63||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,970,080 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 332,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.