↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Article Metrics

World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,101)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice
Published in
BioScience, November 2017
DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix125
Authors

William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Mauro Galetti, Mohammed Alamgir, Eileen Crist, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud, William F. Laurance

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,108 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 416 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 21%
Researcher 88 21%
Student > Master 60 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Unspecified 36 9%
Other 101 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 32%
Environmental Science 93 22%
Unspecified 67 16%
Social Sciences 27 6%
Engineering 16 4%
Other 81 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7543. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2018.
All research outputs
#9
of 12,275,560 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1
of 2,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 284,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,275,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.