↓ Skip to main content

Oxford University Press

Article Metrics

World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,992)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
140 news outlets
blogs
23 blogs
twitter
7914 tweeters
facebook
127 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
55 Google+ users
reddit
12 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
594 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice
Published in
BioScience, November 2017
DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix125
Authors

Ripple, William J., Wolf, Christopher, Newsome, Thomas M., Galetti, Mauro, Alamgir, Mohammed, Crist, Eileen, Mahmoud, Mahmoud I., Laurance, William F., William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Mauro Galetti, Mohammed Alamgir, Eileen Crist, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud, William F. Laurance

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,914 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 594 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 594 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 136 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 21%
Student > Master 92 15%
Student > Bachelor 60 10%
Unspecified 40 7%
Other 141 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 202 34%
Environmental Science 149 25%
Unspecified 81 14%
Social Sciences 36 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 5%
Other 97 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7374. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#9
of 11,403,309 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 270,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,403,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.