@_over_analyzer_ @CodyLonning @pjd93920 @NMachiavalli @RachelBitecofer @mattyglesias science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a p
@CamisGoodBoy @NLRG_ science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)
@gariamray @BechtelOri @belladonna85995 @novasandler @JamesTreakle Scientists & MLK. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind
RT @_Expanded_Mind_: @bigcitydinosaur Malthus is a straw man. The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense…
@bigcitydinosaur Malthus is a straw man. The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et
@mxriowrld999 science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https
@Ryan01477185 @Starsstuff777 @Gustavo2point0 @kaichoyce Science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many eco
@SpacemanStuv @kaichoyce Scientists & MLK. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017
@WatchingWither @FrvrLoveTheFall @theserfstv Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological th
@DamianneTweets Science, & MLK. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https://
@kalikajoy30 @kaichoyce Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2
@MrLayingDown @MeanStfu @itsjustchrislol Science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats
@philsigke @kaichoyce Not peer-reviewed⛔️ Peer-reviewed science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats
@RepustarRobyn @nytimes @pulitzercenter @NYTmag @propublica @AskRepustar Your website is misleading & incorrect. It assumes that human comfort & quality of life are mere second thoughts to population growth. If we all get really uncomfortable and r
@GeorgeMonbiot Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" ht
@wielisc Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https://
@describuon @high240 @kaichoyce Science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist e
@shaglasha @mariellaf1 @TimesRadio "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Both. ht
@normalfrogbitch @Lone_Cub @Sticky_Llama science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats
@SW4MPTHlNG Science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https:
@BearNamedGreg @SpeakingBee @locosherman2 @EccentricTim @ne0liberal That is either science ignorance or denial. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a
RT @_Expanded_Mind_: @BrightAnimal @yaxkukmassive The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material cons…
@YanKyawTun94 @joshuadwuane @tralalalindsey @kaichoyce Science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecol
@BrightAnimal @yaxkukmassive The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" h
@Menomenomicon @hailey_hugest @EmmaVigeland As I said, the left denies science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecol
RT @_Expanded_Mind_: @WmDenzel It is not to be ignored or minimized. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense materia…
@WmDenzel It is not to be ignored or minimized. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 201
@Telegraph @TelGlobalHealth The scientists pleaded that we stabilize the human population, describing how our large numbers—swelled by another 2 billion people since 1992, a 35 percent increase—exert stresses on Earth that can overwhelm other efforts to re
The scientists pleaded that we stabilize the human population, describing how our large numbers—swelled by another 2 billion people since 1992, a 35 percent increase—exert stresses on Earth that can overwhelm other efforts to realize a sustainable future h
@JennyHops @GreenNewsReport @propublica And the science says we should act on: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecolo
@GreenNewsReport @FieldRoamer @suddeneternity The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist
RT @ClimateBen: @rpancost Thanks for this piece. 10,000s of scientists still put their names to papers which put 'swelling' population grow…
RT @ClimateBen: @rpancost Thanks for this piece. 10,000s of scientists still put their names to papers which put 'swelling' population grow…
We should first deal with wealth/income inequality, which is totally insane, outrageous and unsustainable, and then we should deal with pop. growh, which is unsustainable either. We are dealing with none of those symptoms.
@WilkEam @jelson_steve @skepticalzebra @LockdownNo The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (
@ZiaRepustar @behemothhh @lghechi @jasonhickel @AskRepustar The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological
@MintonConnie @voteforCamacho @carriesymonds "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)"
@BarberWil Science denial is trendy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https:
@lucaskzau @pocitos45 @AFP @AFPBrasil Throw science out the window too. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological t
@venusssapphic @fxrahh1 @niyatsiyum @MarrBeautyy @amandaoee_ science denial is trendy "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind man
RT @ClimateBen: @rpancost Thanks for this piece. 10,000s of scientists still put their names to papers which put 'swelling' population grow…
@radiofreeurmom "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Science. https://t.co/WJGNL
@Lik_thaGeek It's not an argument it's science. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 201
@isaiahfcb "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Science. https://t.co/WJGNLZ2uHy
@EvanHeaded @bmihok06254 @AndrewYang "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Both.
@nddragoon @ScottHome1066 @johnpaul_mejia @ChuckWendig "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et a
@AnthonyMRoberto Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)"
@dw_environment "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Both. You are propaganda.
@thecowbob @engineers_feed Both. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Science.
@TynnLyzzi "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Science. https://t.co/WJGNLZ2uHy
RT @ClimateBen: @rpancost Thanks for this piece. 10,000s of scientists still put their names to papers which put 'swelling' population grow…
@rpancost Thanks for this piece. 10,000s of scientists still put their names to papers which put 'swelling' population growth at the top of the list (without clear reference to class, race, capitalism, imperialism). How best to approach/discuss such popula
@snotpool @HondoBronson @bitch_updates @nahuel_freitas Scientific consensus. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption & by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecolo
@cyph3rpunks Because Mickey got published in a peer-reviewed journal. Oh wait, "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption & by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many eco
RT @julian0liver: The best response to those that say "Individual choices don't matter, we need system change", is "Do you vote?". 15k scie…
RT @julian0liver: The best response to those that say "Individual choices don't matter, we need system change", is "Do you vote?". 15k scie…
@XrLeiden 1. Overpop isn't opinion; it's science. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2
RT @julian0liver: The best response to those that say "Individual choices don't matter, we need system change", is "Do you vote?". 15k scie…
@HumanProgress Science denial is fun. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https
Yes, this. Personal responsibility AND system change, with a healthy dose of internal and relational work.
RT @julian0liver: The best response to those that say "Individual choices don't matter, we need system change", is "Do you vote?". 15k scie…
The best response to those that say "Individual choices don't matter, we need system change", is "Do you vote?". 15k scientists from 184 countries made it super clear 2yrs back, in their '2nd warning to humanity' - we need /both/ per-capita & system ch
@maddieh8910 @xanabon @Bigwig70125760 @sarsiano @cccelenaaa Peer-reviewed journals are explicitly against you minimizing it: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid populatio
@FUchefuna Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" https
@mariorestini @HM_Adorf @Silke52929066 @DisruptResearch @elonmusk @Tesla Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary dri
@morganisnotelsa @YamsEnthusiast "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" Both. http
@histameans Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" http
@LosAshless @ScenarioLENS @Brian_F_Sheehan "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)" B
@stephencrose Science denial is a popular fantasy. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al.
@cobber_bobber @heycordeiro @Western_Trad Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological thre
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
@sarsiano @Bigwig70125760 @xanabon @cccelenaaa Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological
@SaraBellLv @dwain_campbell Most importantly, the science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist
@mike4humanity @GoodwinCharlie @SlavicAgent @SeekingPraxis @MuttBus Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver b
@kaitlynbiondo @mermaidsflor @animadiscordia That is a science-denying blog post. This is a scientific journal: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primar
@thed0gzone @HaseosAnimation @literallysofie As for the actual science, "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological t
alright pack it up malthus
@radariesbaby @AGuyNamedNam Science denial is popular. "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et
@tecknow @linnaeus_tweets @DeoTasDevil @VacuousEyes @GunRoar People who deny overpop are science deniers "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primar
In 1992, 1,700 of the world's leading scientists, including the majority of living Nobel laureates in the sciences issued this warning: https://t.co/uVzdtelC6y Then 25 years later, 10,000+ of the world's leading scientists issued this 2nd warning: https:/
RT @progmediareview: @MattyBeRad @GeochemOz @bigallende @GettBabb @AFP The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our…
@MattyBeRad @GeochemOz @bigallende @GettBabb @AFP The science: "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (C
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
@pinkfury936 @Ahhhfluffernugg @alliumdevourer "We are jeopardizing our future by not reining in our intense material consumption and by not perceiving continued rapid population growth as a primary driver behind many ecological threats (Crist et al. 2017)"
Pro tip: calling on 'humanity' to act on climate change isn't really helpful imho. we should be clear about this in climate communication: it was the collective power of some *not all * human beings that got us into this mess. https://t.co/JramlO4Ua1
RT @ClimateBen: @guardian None of this is front page news. 👇 'By failing to adequately limit population growth, *reassess the role of an…
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
@pete_ar_fryn @GHGGuru @UCDavisCLEAR @Evsthetractor This was the tweet that got me blocked, in case you're curious. I think he felt insulted by the suggestion that, as an industry consultant, he's not the most objective possible source. I apologise if he f
RT @ClimateBen: 3. For years scientists and postgrowth academics have been showing how economic growth is destroying the natural systems ne…
RT @Karmageddon67: @therealjnewman @ItsBouquet @MarkMcGowanMP Both Liberals & Labor only listen to the science that suits them. Not the s…
@therealjnewman @ItsBouquet @MarkMcGowanMP Both Liberals & Labor only listen to the science that suits them. Not the stuff that’s, well, inconvenient. https://t.co/Dv1Eg5fmEm
RT @ClimateBen: 2. Forests will soon be gone. Over 20,000 scientists/experts fear for our forests. https://t.co/YJpN59PDdQ 'Especially t…
@mendipfarmer @DavidButler34 Considering this science... https://t.co/oEiTIgImb5
RT @awright4645: So much obsession with "Moonbat", yet he's merely echoing 2017's 'World Scientists' Warning to Humanity', which recommends…