The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Total and subtypes of dietary fat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study 1–3
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.116.142034 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marta Guasch-Ferré, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Dolores Corella, Helmut Schröder, Ramon Estruch, Emilio Ros, Fernando Arós, Enrique Gómez-Gracia, Miquel Fiol, Lluís Serra-Majem, José Lapetra, Josep Basora, Nerea Martín-Calvo, Olga Portoles, Montserrat Fitó, Frank B Hu, Lluís Forga, Jordi Salas-Salvadó |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 19% |
Australia | 8 | 15% |
Spain | 7 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
AN | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Russia | 1 | 2% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 23% |
Scientists | 7 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 225 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
Researcher | 23 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
Other | 48 | 21% |
Unknown | 65 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 9% |
Unknown | 86 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#207,248
of 26,245,199 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#562
of 12,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,682
of 454,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#12
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,199 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.