@mamelsberg @thunderthemoon @Alyssa3467 @Unity_MoT @lecanardnoir @RachelEG16 @itisenough1588 Had I claimed the drawing is a peer reviewed biology paper, you might have a pont. As it is, I haven't. Here, however, is a peer reviewed biology paper that expla
@CRSerenity2132 @zealouslyobey @erikscottdebie @ManEatsBible @SoulWorkMSW @virtuosamujer31 @Deigratia1985 @ZachWLambert "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
@rosesillygoober @Black_D_Gamer1 @AntiExtremtCen When you explain to people online who have never studied biology, the difference between blogs and peer reviewed biology papers, but they use basic statistic terminology which they don't even understand. ht
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
@Flam3emperor622 @robov2 @HRC I have already given a paper by the world's leading experts on the evolution of sex. Are you saying they are liars? What have they got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Flam3emperor622 @robov2 @HRC Well biology has lots of active research trying to understand why only two discrete sexes have ever evolved: male and female. We have a pretty good idea now. This is a good paper as it has lots of plain language for the non-
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
RT @zaelefty: For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution…
For more on how the sexes are fundamentally defined and why there are only two, see this paper from experts in the evolution of sex. https://t.co/Z4qdmqKEW3
@RobinElise007 @WillsAScot @sanshee01 @LGBwiththeT Actual science: https://t.co/OiiXrTTLQj
@na_khuda_ @zaelefty @RealMariaButt Already did & all the primary scientific literature can explain the two sexes & how they evolved. But if you truly want to read scientific literature about the two sexes, sure. Start there: https://t.co/uYzNHDtJ2
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
@Diffractor1 "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)" https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
@HoveringBrick @Frollein_VogelV Bist du bisschen dumm? Ja, scheinbar. Der Mensch pflanzt sich anisogam fort und die Erscheinung ist dimorph. Vielleicht solltest du bei biologischen Themen ganz, ganz still sein. Bisschen Nachhilfe gefällig https://t.co/mF
@MikeKling9 @testzugang82 @_lnnen_WT @monimcclane @stefan_schistek @gespraechswert @CorneliaKost "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with
@MelodyDickens @Heather_pw @lecanardnoir @stephenwhittle @TheSun "religious notion of biology" Evolutionary biology is, in simple terms, descent with modification plus natural selection based on biological fitness. There is an excellent paper here - http
@GoddessOf_Trash @Schmaniel @HarryTheGreat98 @kid_twiglet @crwarmuth44 @KatyMontgomerie Here is a good and accessible paper, it is written in non-technical language, so you ought to be able to understand it. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@StevenStubble @Robobabe_ @ChanLPfa [1] Lehtonen J, Parker G (2014) Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d [2] Schärer, L (2017) The varied ways of being male and female. https://t.co/y8oyhqpaIa
@spencerforhire @WinnowingWind @DarlaLek @moonbeamer6 @assignedmedia No, there isn’t. Look, we have male and female. That’s two. Provide some other sexes and justify it. Otherwise I’ll go with the literature https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
@WoodGuthriempls @MForstater Actual biologists: https://t.co/9rwtKAgoXW
@WoodGuthriempls @Freda_Wa11ace @MForstater Please actually read some science https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/THnGq75t8n
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
@jfrickuga @hugeislands @its_ermintrude @RottenInDenmark @assignedmedia @zaelefty "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphi
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
RT @Cirulis_A: @saplaksnis @Berni_vispirms Arī "universitātes" bioloģijā. https://t.co/Df2LaHT8pE https://t.co/bQ19gWBKNH
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
RT @Cirulis_A: Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai…
Kāpēc eksistē divi dzimumi? Jo eksistē tikai diva tipa dzimumšūnas, kuras attiecīgi ražo vai nu vīrieši (spermatozoīdus) vai sievietes (olšūnas). https://t.co/bQ19gWBKNH
@saplaksnis @Berni_vispirms Arī "universitātes" bioloģijā. https://t.co/Df2LaHT8pE https://t.co/bQ19gWBKNH
@KAMK75756445 @NathanielHart72 @riScorpian @assignedmedia Here you go, a peer reviewed biology paper by some of the leading research biologists in the field, explaining why only 2 sexes have evolved. https://t.co/i7wWG7xAFX
@Undead_Paragon @adhib @GCMom693278 @STILLTish Citation needed. Here, read a biology paper https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@Bithlord2 @jfrickuga @RottenInDenmark @assignedmedia So you truly do not understand why and how biology defines the sexes? That's pretty sad for someone who insists on telling other people how "wrong" they are. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@RadFemme74 @cityocarapilled @ZackFord It's a lot more than a 'descriptive category' sweetheart. Biological sex is a fixed material reality. It certainly doesn't determine how you think or live, but it thoroughly determines who you are: https://t.co/b6Ip6
@JandarSunstar69 @Remy_Legal @ZackFord How about a paper https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@d4nny1337 @JackMBeecher @plesisoul @Daderp1242389 @HappyTime1066 Read the paper. Even the title on its own confirms my position. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@m_eee_p @casus_o @the_Weeb_boi @SO101191142131 @theserfstv And it’s quite easy. Here. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@Lordpandawaffle @CobraWine @Rob_ThaBuilder The definition of sexes that applies across all anisogamous species and across all time periods. (Cats, humans, seahorses, giraffes, etc...) If you wish to learn more about the evolution of the two sexes: https:
@Mikil54 @Elzaforas @pivimarina @SwipeWright @zaelefty Ser responsable no es construir. Vivir alejado de la realidad permite inventarse significados para cualquier palabra. La testosterona no hace crecer tejido testicular en unos ovarios formados. En todo
@Skywalker_483 @lecanardnoir @sisalto @ErinInTheMorn I don't. Biology does. Here's a peer reviewed biology paper that explains in great detail why there are 2 discrete sexes. https://t.co/i7wWG7xAFX
@testzugang82 Oder das hier: https://t.co/puxY3IBfZK
RT @lecanardnoir: @mamelsberg @RachelEG16 @Alyssa3467 @itisenough1588 What gibberish. We know how the two sexes evolved. (see link(. And…
@mamelsberg @RachelEG16 @Alyssa3467 @itisenough1588 What gibberish. We know how the two sexes evolved. (see link(. And in biology "Immutable" has a meaning - a one way, one time pathway of development. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Kassandra_Zerb @SwipeWright You’re so uneducated on this subject. Seriously, it’s not even debatable, swyer syndrome is considered female and sex is not defined by chromosomes. Read a book. Stop spreading your ignorance because you don’t know what sex c
@dimboskimpodon @Coffeefrappeyum @cheomitII @gnomishchampion @KatyMontgomerie https://t.co/36qzr39xsf Sexual reproduction is the name of the reproduction strategy. Your sex is which role in the strategy your body is centerer around filling. There are only
@lunchboxxy @BobWhencer @jonWalk49263541 @PTElephant @ChoooCole @elonmusk Only two sexes have ever evolved. That is pretty perfect. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Eorthedohtor @jamesrhicks54 @SusanFairweathe @finngalkn @JoanneTel @BraddockBessie But here, let’s try some peer reviewed literature. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@obradam 🤷♂️🤷♀️ https://t.co/jNMjCBVmOk
@Victor_T1000 Tady je celkem univerzální definice pohlaví, ale jazyk a smysluplnou komunikaci je zjevně nutné zničit za každou cenu. https://t.co/EefQVzJRGy https://t.co/Duj9832Tqq
@Jaydee_Old_Boy @Alex0987334909 @Polisonyx @PinkNews Why would I agree with a someone who has a political agenda over someone who is impartial? https://t.co/ih6N7igcUs
@lafrattaglia @Shelleybe3 @kinjones29 @ejrosetta @wrxmanpaul This isn’t a scientific source… you want a scientific source? Here https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@Axmortl @TheSerenJones @finngalkn If you googled it and found a blog to tell you that, you didn’t do your research. Modern biology books and articles: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/unUdRgl7gj
@Zamil__ @mathsuckz @NicoleGohlke PS: Ich gehe mal in Vorleistung. Hier eine wissenschaftliche Publikation die sich mit der Frage befasse warum sich GENAU zwei Geschlechter (also nicht mehrere und kein Spektrum) entwickelt hat https://t.co/HOXwC3FYDM
@paul_wilson_nz @bwhVycwky56 @amy_sargeant_ Wait no, how about a peer reviewed biology paper by actual biologists… https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@zaelefty The paper you're quoting from there also says that the definition of sex varies in its glossary. https://t.co/8sfoYSVMOp
@simarilon @GrueneBundestag @katdro Hier nochmal eine Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichung die sich mit der Frage befasst warum sich nor 2 und nicht mehr Geschlechter entwickelt haben https://t.co/HOXwC3FqOe
@simarilon @tedrichtofen @GrueneBundestag @katdro Übrigens. hier mal etwas was du dich weigerst zu tun. Eine Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichung die siech damit befasst warum sich nur zwei Geschlechter entwickelt haben https://t.co/HOXwC3FqOe
@scottgrvs @zaelefty What we do is use evolutionary theory to explain why we observe just two sexes, as I showed you here. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
RT @lecanardnoir: @scottgrvs @zaelefty That two gamete types is a property of now well understood evolutionary forces across almost all spe…
@scottgrvs @zaelefty That two gamete types is a property of now well understood evolutionary forces across almost all species. This gives rise to the two reproductive classes of male and female. Are these biologists wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Morifloury @suesue2pointO @vulturebunny @PatrickSBruck @Lukeleisher @EndWokenessAOC @TheRightCant Gametes are literally the foundation of sex. This isn’t debatable. Next time read a biology book, not a blog. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@JoyMoone @eggandsperm @baker271974 @muichimotsu @SwipeWright I do not want it to. And yes: This is the universal definition of sex. https://t.co/AJcMjRXlOw
@qzar9999 @heroicslug @Klara_and_Nonna @MeatLLM @ReedHawk2 @ErinInTheMorn Oh not what you wanted? Well how about a peer reviewed paper https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@CozyLadNW @blueingaround @DubeJimy @APoemofBragi @thatmatsudaira @Studio89_Design This is a good paper for people who know nothing about biology like you, as it explains why two and only two sexes have evolved in pretty clear English. https://t.co/3GsgAR
@testzugang82 @Frollein_VogelV We know that sex *cannot* be a spectrum. It would be evolutionary unstable and rapidly evolve away back to two discrete sexes. We can model this with theoretical models now and understand why we only see two sexes: male and
@MBHaz3 @cat_yawns @Daderp1242389 I am merely saying what this paper is about. Are these biologists wrong to say only two sexes have evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@cat_yawns @Daderp1242389 You are then incorrect and muddled about the biology. Do read this excellent summary of this: "why are there boys and why are there girls?" Good clear language for the non-expert, like you. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
RT @forevershallon: @LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extr…
RT @forevershallon: @LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extr…
@ZackHugsBack @whopperstreet @ErinInTheMorn @ZoAndBehold Oh and, she doesn’t claim sex has a bimodal distribution…. She doesn’t statistically demonstrate her claims. But the. We have ACTUAL biologists: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
RT @forevershallon: @LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extr…
RT @forevershallon: @LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extr…
@LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extraordinary and wondrous complexity, but only two sexes have ever evolved. The only question is why. https://t.co/wm0MARlIFf
@TheMtPearlTree @GKF709 @DukePress @HidaViloria @calstate There are hundreds of papers on this topic, stretching back decades. Here is one which was authored by one of the world's leading experts in this field. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@SplattershotSr @SnowySecluse @EllieGabalus No, this is foundational stuff: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@corduroyshirt @Bootstrapkook @SwipeWright @karissapersists @AriDrennen @zaelefty Feel free to come back to discuss at any point. To get you started here is a good paper by one of the world's leading experts on the subject. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@gewooneenvrouw @realjennifer812 @amy_sargeant_ Have you looked at the paper? https://t.co/9jprMreGey
@realjennifer812 @amy_sargeant_ There are lots of female biologists who are against gender ideology. And human sex is binary. See for instance: https://t.co/EA2GgBfxcM