RT @forevershallon: @LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extr…
@ZackHugsBack @whopperstreet @ErinInTheMorn @ZoAndBehold Oh and, she doesn’t claim sex has a bimodal distribution…. She doesn’t statistically demonstrate her claims. But the. We have ACTUAL biologists: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
RT @forevershallon: @LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extr…
RT @forevershallon: @LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extr…
@LabelFreeBrands That fungus is *stunning*. Also, mating types aren’t sexes. Life on this planet displays the most extraordinary and wondrous complexity, but only two sexes have ever evolved. The only question is why. https://t.co/wm0MARlIFf
@TheMtPearlTree @GKF709 @DukePress @HidaViloria @calstate There are hundreds of papers on this topic, stretching back decades. Here is one which was authored by one of the world's leading experts in this field. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@SplattershotSr @SnowySecluse @EllieGabalus No, this is foundational stuff: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@corduroyshirt @Bootstrapkook @SwipeWright @karissapersists @AriDrennen @zaelefty Feel free to come back to discuss at any point. To get you started here is a good paper by one of the world's leading experts on the subject. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@gewooneenvrouw @realjennifer812 @amy_sargeant_ Have you looked at the paper? https://t.co/9jprMreGey
@realjennifer812 @amy_sargeant_ There are lots of female biologists who are against gender ideology. And human sex is binary. See for instance: https://t.co/EA2GgBfxcM
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
RT @zaelefty: For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more t…
For anisogamous species (most complex multicells), the answer is 2. It's the average, median, and mode. There are no more than two in any species. So it seems to be the physical and mathematical maximum. [For more, see: https://t.co/5onYpbux8B]
@onewendy @Regenbo5en @Frances_Coppola @matthewrobb701 @garylfrancione Anyone with "scientific knowledge" knows that two sexes are the most evolutionarily stable number for anisogamous species https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx https://t.co/QRkIsllEGT
@pjs_harvey @DREWSEES @FionnMacCool @Gargle_Farts @Noellenarwhal @albertagirl4444 @hawkbox @Andystruth It ought to be everywhere and winning Nobel Prizes as not too long ago we had developed a pretty good theoretical understanding of why two and only two d
@PleaseSenior @Daderp1242389 @HarryTheGreat98 @KonznSucks @secretmars @DH_Garrison This is a good paper that explains why we know only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. it has good clear English sections for the non-expert, like you. https://t.co/3Gs
@Jaydee_Old_Boy @objective2112 @ElonIsACisBaby @E90959876901 @PinkNews The phenotype that is structured around large gametes. If you're interested in reading about the two sexes, how they evolved and why: https://t.co/uYzNHDtJ2q Males and females hav
@EdwardWaretini @warmsox @ConflictOfValue @sappholives83 @neiltyson @FondOfBeetles @SwipeWright @RichardDawkins @will_malone And science shows that sex is binary and immutable. All, or at least most, reputable biologists stand by this. Two human sexes exi
@cartoontomb @stephanpalagan Evtl. haben Sie komplett falsche Vorstellungen von den Zeiträumen der Evolution und der Art der Variabilität derselben: https://t.co/ZmJFzSXNID
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
RT @DEU_ScienceGeek: Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (htt…
Man muss sich vor Augen halten, dass die Anisogamie wahrscheinlich über 1 Mrd. Jahre in der Evolution zurückliegt (https://t.co/bAWkjoUlFI). Das heißt, es gab zwei Geschlechter, schon lange bevor es Menschen und deren Ideen von sozialen Geschlechterrollen
@therealeverlade @GetRekTUWiLL That's a fallacy-filled blog post that many people have already addressed & debunked. If you actually want to learn about the two sexes and how they evolved: https://t.co/uYzNHDtJ2q (Because yes, in 1.2 billion years, t
@raptorbaitjoe @ThomasWillett9 You can easily look this up. It comes from biologists lol This drivel about sex not being binary does not come from any statistics literate biologist https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@PRETTIESTANIMAL @BobKevinson @ChoooCole Looks like you need to go back to the basics of what sexes are, how they evolved, and why. https://t.co/uYzNHDtJ2q If you're not a reader and you prefer video content: https://t.co/npw3hecI1P
@replygirl9 @mapeslover69 @Hiya654321 Sex is not a spectrum. This paper explains why two and only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. It has easy-to-read sections for the non-expert, like you. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Only_A_Relax My gift to you clown. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@FromtheSeries_ @RvrLrd @The_sigma_fem A YouTube video with accurate and verifiable information. But if you prefer, you can also read about the sexes and their evolution here: https://t.co/uYzNHDtJ2q
@QueerTestimony @picklebll @bonhoefferchild I am going to rely on the peer reviewed literature as my authority and not willy waggle my PhD at you. You would rather gauge truth by certificate though as you have no knowledge of the literature. Yet you have
@QueerTestimony @picklebll @bonhoefferchild Only in crank gender studies departments using their 'queer theory'. In biology we are getting much better at understanding exactly why there are just two sexes. This a good paper with plain English for the n
@PInvararity @GeorgeOCarroll @keelhaulrose42 Sex is a binary of male and female defined with respect to gamete types. That is what is in the peer reviewed biology literature. See here for example, https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@AlexGaggio @ManuelBruder71 @michellespj @betsvigi9 @stephenpirak @AlastairMcA30 There is variety in sexual characteristics. Some things are bigger than others'. There are only two sexes though. We understand why that is in detail. https://t.co/3GsgARCn
@darumadollhc Why are you lying? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@KAMK75756445 @Burntoastocloc1 @JCooper459 @AngieMunro331 @KatyMontgomerie This is a from the world's experts on the evolution of sex, explaining why only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. Good plain English descriptions in places for the non-expert, l
@XxianC @ColinHull3 @AquilakaHecate @spikedonline I base my beliefs on well established peer reviewed biology that two and only two sexes have ever evolved. e.g. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Sh1talk1 @Murph2756 @RW_Crank @luckjustkissed1 @Mutant_Menace @PopCrave This is the third time I have sent you this paper, Sh1talk. Do read it this time. I also sent you a paper about sex determination in mammals as you seem a bit muddled in that area to
@Sh1talk1 @Murph2756 @RW_Crank @luckjustkissed1 @Mutant_Menace @PopCrave Here is a good paper which consolidates decades of research into the evolution of the sexes. It's peer reviewed and written by a research biologist. It clearly states that two (and on
@Sh1talk1 @Murph2756 @RW_Crank @luckjustkissed1 @Mutant_Menace @PopCrave Here is a paper written by one of the world's foremost experts on the evolution of sex; it demonstrates that two (and only two) sexes have evolved and explains why. https://t.co/fVEh
@RealCarlAllen @Notary_Pubic @One_Supernova @SwipeWright It's been a jolly few hours, however, I cannot babysit forever, but Uncle WW always leaves gifts. Here is a peer reviewed biology paper explaining sex is binary. It's written in simple language, so
@elxavioh @Daderp1242389 @J_m15w @neiltyson All wrong. Sexes are discrete and countable. There are precisely two sexes. We know why that is now is some detail, eg.g see https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@RealCarlAllen @NathanielHart72 @Rationalist69 @SwipeWright https://t.co/uYzNHDtJ2q The evolution of the two sexes. Maybe you'll learn something.
@VondalSavage1 @FifeRight14 @TasDevyl @Quibilah1 And that is nonsense. We know only two sexes have ever evolved. These sexes are discrete and functionally different because of extreme anisogamy. The "bimodal' thing is just fashionable nonsense. https://t
@AdotKitz @BlakeBlakebabee @ArtemisDiana_22 @atalanta44 @GlenIrvine1 @LGBwiththeT I studied biology as a university, a place you never have been. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o Cite your sources or have a seat
@bt_revengeswift @hygtglover @nothingnew37363 @cowboylikefiz This is now the third time I have sent you this paper, written by a leading expert on this subject. I do recommend actually reading it this time. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@bt_revengeswift @hygtglover @nothingnew37363 @cowboylikefiz I have already provided you a with a peer reviewed biology paper written by one of the world's leading experts in this field. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@pastryarm @bt_revengeswift @hygtglover @nothingnew37363 @cowboylikefiz This is a research paper by one of the world's leading experts on this issue. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@LostinAusten27 @truthwins81 @ChristianPost @againstgrmrs Well the past decade or so has seen a lot of interesting work done on understanding *why* only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. Plain English language here for the non-expert, like you. But y
@RJDownard @hemantmehta Do you agree that only two discrete sexed have evolved as this paper shows? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@RJDownard @hemantmehta And all of the peer reviewed biology tests sex as a categorical variable with just two classes. We know why only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@minoc2 @DixonBrandywine @LoveStopsHatred Sex is binary. We are anisogamous. This isn't in contention. Here, this is what a real journal reference looks like: notice it clearly states 2 sexes. https://t.co/apjwOm1f7k
RT @damomen76: @Uuwuovo @ElonIsACisBaby @RichardDawkins Shut. Up. https://t.co/wONmUN6piy
@100MsgynstMyths @F__kyouMinge @OhNoItsJudith I do not claim that "intersex" people do not exist so I do not have to prove that. I have cited papers that show why only two sexes have ever evolkved (e.g. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6)
@wyturt @RichardDawkins Apparently not. In case you're wondering what a scientific paper looks like ... It even contains the definition of the two sexes. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@mamelsberg @RealistIdealis3 @Nick3lBets @SwipeWright @hemantmehta Oh no, a publication I don't like with someone I'm trying to discredit. How about this easy to read defintion for you: https://t.co/AFrwjhGALj
@F__kyouMinge @OhNoItsJudith ... This is a very good paper that explains what a sex is, and why only two discrete sexes have evolved. It has good plain English sections for the non-expert, like you. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@rjeichelberger @mcjoggerson @rickscheibner @ThinkingAtheist @SethAndrewsTTA The peer reviewed biology literature fully supports Dawkins when he says sex is a binary. We know why two, and only two, discrete sexes have evolved in a lot of detail. This pap
RT @lecanardnoir: @linaii_saye @RichardDawkins Biology can explain in fantastic detail now why there exist just two sexes. And why two have…
RT @lecanardnoir: @linaii_saye @RichardDawkins Biology can explain in fantastic detail now why there exist just two sexes. And why two have…
@petaswarbrick @WSallthisthen @Opiumbrella Only if you deny evolution. Two sexes are the most evolutionarily stable number in anisogamous species https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx https://t.co/0i8ydwYDym
@michaelsnook Here is a good review on the evolution of sex https://t.co/w2U3kwpCPZ
@linaii_saye @RichardDawkins Biology can explain in fantastic detail now why there exist just two sexes. And why two have only ever evolved. This is a good review paper with simple English language throughout for non experts like you. https://t.co/3Gsg
@jammaraay @johnthomas1536 @Journy96 @theArdenHart @hemantmehta You're citing Zach, who doesn't seem to read the papers he cites too closely, or at the very least, misses some important details (e.g., https://t.co/5WG43bkkB5).
@0diar3 @JohnWay1703742 @SuperDragoon978 @DavidSpacewad @AriDrennen Accusing me of not reading it is bad faith. Again, which sources claim sex is bimodal. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/EI4PKQp8ph
@thisyouRIOT @francesweetman Bible? I'm an atheist, and here's an actual scientific paper from the primary biology lit which explains how and why only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/qj16ka4927
RT @lecanardnoir: @theevilutionist @muri76483833 @cybeledownunder @KatarinaHill2 @JacksonWheat1 Lets look at this very good peer reviewed b…
@theevilutionist @muri76483833 @cybeledownunder @KatarinaHill2 @JacksonWheat1 Lets look at this very good peer reviewed biology paper on the evolution of sex and what we know. It has good plain English sections for the non-expert like you. It explains wh
@PrefixBond @thejameofficial @NathanielHart72 @SEAConsv @ccorafaye @BananasFox @FNCriticGuy @RightWingCope Amazingly, we know why two discrete sex categories have evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Appoota @schnookiekins This is literally well known… If male is defined by one type and female another type, by definition both types is both male and female… That’s why sequential hermaphrodites are a thing? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/J9CW
@muri76483833 @cybeledownunder @KatarinaHill2 Well it has been a hot topic of research over the past decade as to why only two sexes have ever evolved. This is a good summary peer reviewed paper that can be easily understood by non-experts. https://t.co/
@dogonatinroof @CvNerve @zeno001 @SnakeSolid1993 She changed her mind to what the peer reviewed biology says. Are these biologists wrong and why? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@dogonatinroof @CvNerve @zeno001 @SnakeSolid1993 So you are not an expert but you are calling an expert wrong. Here is a very good biology paper explaining “the consensus” as to why two and only two sexes have ever evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
@HarperDean935 @Bootstrapkook @bttldog @RichardDawkins Straightaway you out yourself as scientifically illiterate. Gametes aren't "genitalia", you dolt. Genitalia are sex ORGANS, gametes are sex CELLS. I suggest you read up on some actual science instead o
RT @Speckasand: @JuhaKuusama @G_S_Bhogal @EpettingJ Lmao, there are only two sexes in nature, in all organisms that have sexes. That's bec…
@JuhaKuusama @G_S_Bhogal Yet ANOTHER gender woo opinion piece! NOT a serious biology paper but a "news feature" for crying out loud. Read some proper peer-reviewed biology here and stop being being a gender cultist. Sex is binary: https://t.co/Ijgjj6sRmy