@lecanardnoir @Science54900201 The definition used here doesn't mention anything about it having to have been an evolved trait: https://t.co/yBs25YL93a
@housing_coop @JaneBee123 @IMissHitchSlaps @PetplanUK Peer reviewed biology paper https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@akudenreberu @Daderp1242389 @WinnowingWind @AndoValentine @tpa4dayz @ken61267 @EuphoriTori Well you have been misled then. A current research topic in biology in the past decade or sop is to understand why only two distinct and discrete sexes have ever
@eulig_ @JohnLummus1 @LibertyCappy I am going to bed now, but I will leave you with this paper - written in very simple and non-technical language so even people, like yourself, with no education on the subject *should* be able to grasp it. All the best.
@42007s @arrhythmaticc @JasperIsDead36 This is a very good paper that describes what we know about why two and only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. Good plain English aspects for the non expert like you. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@aidaschiton @ken61267 @yelsiyelis All you have to do is ask. Here is a peer reviewed biology paper written by one of the world's leading experts on the evolution of sex. The paper explains that two, and only two, sexes have evolved. https://t.co/fVEhm8M
@SolaireSheep @KiyomizuAkua @SheiiaTheRito @gauged_honor @WhereTrueLoveIs We did not enforce a split between man and woman. Nature evolved two biological sexes in the majority of species: https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs These sexes are fixed in reality. We shoul
@Daderp1242389 @WinnowingWind @SSugoi666 @biofriendly2020 @Javier_hombre2 @LaMaria199 @_HumillaProgres @irene_gp @MadreDeTragonas @mikey_rg97 @2noerus @ByronJos04 @Donovan38924278 @Javier_hombre @mask3c0 En la caja 3.3 habla de gametos amiguito.
@LordTensenVaps @Javier_hombre2 @biofriendly2020 @2noerus @PatoBMo @irene_gp @LaMaria199 @_HumillaProgres @MadreDeTragonas @SSugoi666 @mikey_rg97 @ByronJos04 @Donovan38924278 @Javier_hombre @mask3c0 @bebe_Deluz More dishonesty from you. This was the first
@Ivotian @SheiiaTheRito @gauged_honor @WhereTrueLoveIs @zaelefty You don't understand science. https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs
@yikesbroskiii @munro_nell @ThomasWillett9 This paper again says you are incorrect. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@yikesbroskiii @munro_nell @ThomasWillett9 You need to explain why you can easily find blogs and opinion articles, but not peer reviewed biology papers. Once again, this paper explains for you why there are just two discrete sexes. https://t.co/3GsgARBP
@yikesbroskiii @munro_nell @ThomasWillett9 Biologists have spent the past decade or so understanding why only two sexes have evolved in a billion years and why there is no range or spectrum of sexes. Here is a good explainer (from the world's top experts
@IlianaTRocha @stephen76102435 @hfjohnsen @BahiraR @Kelans27 @SamsonEffect @realJ_Mitchell No? Well how about a peer reviewed biology paper! https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@PatoBMo @SSugoi666 @LordTensenVaps @irene_gp @MadreDeTragonas @mikey_rg97 @2noerus Este no es un documento revisado por pares. Aquí hay un artículo revisado por pares que confirma que el sexo se define en relación con los gametos. https://t.co/fVEhm
@PatoBMo @irene_gp @LordTensenVaps @MadreDeTragonas @SSugoi666 @mikey_rg97 @2noerus Ninguna de estas son fuentes de la literatura primaria. Aquí hay un artículo revisado por pares, por el principal experto en la evolución del sexo. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb
@LordTensenVaps @irene_gp @PatoBMo @MadreDeTragonas @SSugoi666 @mikey_rg97 @2noerus Este es un artículo de biología revisado por pares por uno de los principales biólogos del mundo sobre este tema. Léelo. https://t.co/E2e6lqGGMJ
RT @WinnowingWind: @LordTensenVaps @irene_gp @PatoBMo @MadreDeTragonas @SSugoi666 @mikey_rg97 @2noerus Este es un ejemplo de un artículo d…
@LordTensenVaps @irene_gp @PatoBMo @MadreDeTragonas @SSugoi666 @mikey_rg97 @2noerus Este es un ejemplo de un artículo de biología real revisado por pares, escrito por biólogos investigadores y publicado en una revista académica. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@AppleturretsAlt @WritersPlace_ @LoveMusicals6 @SCSmith_515 No wait, I’m sure what you wanted was actually a peer reviewed biology paper. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@PaulTatum4 @Halfsike @gamineghoul @ThomasWillett9 You are so muddled. Slow down and read. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@PaulTatum4 @gamineghoul @ThomasWillett9 @Halfsike I don’t know how to say this, but we have male and females *because* of the fundamental asymmetry in gametes. This is not controversial. A summary for you… https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Hades9911 @Tourma_ @RespectfulMemes Could I suggest that rather than believing a random person on Twitter, here is a paper by the foremost authority on the evolution of the sexes. He clearly shows that two (and only two) sexes have evolved. Not three. h
@IMSpardagus @SimonFRCox @guardian If you want evidence of this, evolutionary biologists have seen it as a problem to solves as to why we only ever observe two sexes in nature and why that is so stable across a billion years of evolution. We now know why t
@johnFstemmedy @Parsleymael @salltweets You have offered your opinion - not good enough. You have refused to provide a single peer reviewed biology paper. Here is a paper demonstrating that only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@joooohnishere @Shelducks8 @DrKittyGirl All of biology "pushes against" this nonsense. This is a very good paper from the world's leading researchers on the evolution of sex explaining why only two have ever evolved. It has good plain language summaries
@AshleyTehBat Let’s go with a biology dictionary, book, and a peer reviewed biology paper https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/C5zP0HDBVD
@greatervince @zaelefty Clearly not, because you believe you can be in-between sex.... You have no idea what sex even is. https://t.co/36qzr3a5hN
@CallumPenguin @LawfulEvil5 @KatieInBoston1 @HenryHi13649483 @LGBwiththeT I've provided dozens of scientific papers, sweetie. https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs
@HurricaneMomo @lecanardnoir @TheRealFitzroy @HallmarkDestiel @JacksonMacmanus @MollyBe44568117 @KatyMontgomerie As someone who 'works in genetics lab' would you kindly point out what what bits the actual biologists got wrong in the peer reviewed paper, wh
@GulpofMagpies @HurricaneMomo @TheRealFitzroy @HallmarkDestiel @JacksonMacmanus @MollyBe44568117 @KatyMontgomerie @sciam Well you can compare her word as a 'genetic lab worker' to what the actual experts on the evolution of the sexes have to say. https://
@HurricaneMomo @TheRealFitzroy @HallmarkDestiel @JacksonMacmanus @MollyBe44568117 @KatyMontgomerie Do not rely on my blog. Let's rely on what the peer reviewed biology literature says. Did you get back to me about this paper? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@CallumPenguin @HenryHi13649483 @LGBwiththeT Sweetheart, you really need to read some science. The whole reason you EXIST is because nature separated humans into two different sexes. https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs
@HurricaneMomo @TheRealFitzroy @HallmarkDestiel @JacksonMacmanus @MollyBe44568117 @KatyMontgomerie I can cite a lot of literature that explains why sex is a dichotomy. Did you respond to this one? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@HurricaneMomo @TheRealFitzroy @HallmarkDestiel @JacksonMacmanus @MollyBe44568117 @KatyMontgomerie Here some experts on the evolution of sex explaining why we now know why only two discrete sexes have evolved and why a continuum is not possible. https://
@MechaniVal @surfjaseoz @Kassandra_Zerb @ValoisDuBins @2damntrans @FreddyP6454 @LtotheOtotheMAX This isn’t even debatable. To argue it is unsolved why it is more advantageous than asexual reproduction is laughably silly. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@GulpofMagpies @BroughtyLass @Never_Seen_Trek Here are some of the top evolutionary biologists explaining in their peer reviewed literature why only two sexes have ever evolved. Some good easy-to-read summaries for the non-expert like you. https://t.co/3
@FloofyMaki @Alexand03661021 @LGBwiththeT We can take my tweet line by line if you can't point to specific bit you disagree with. "Two (and only two) sexes have evolved." Lehtonen J. and Parker A G, (2014) Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the e
@DMVecna @Jmehlh @MattLech Just a real graph will do. Here is a good peer reviewed paper which demonstrates there are just two sexes. It is written in accessible language so even laypeople should find it understandable. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@lunchboxxy @DuncanCantDie @Vox_Oculi @FactsMatterPpl @blaccherrii @Bornakang Are these top evolutionary biologists invoking a straw man here when they describe the origin of the two sexes as a result of anisogamy? https://t.co/3GsgARCn2E
@jessikittygay @FerryryDE @AceT87 @KatysCartoons You can't get basic biology right and think you'd do any better with advanced. Not today, goblin. https://t.co/syzaVa3eFh
@HeatherAle4 @mary_scone @billybragg “Academic science” does indeed define “sex” by reprod stratagem - ie, which gamete the body is geared towards producing; it’s only “junk science” that sells the spectrum idea. https://t.co/JLCpmor5xi
@Siniy18591938 @allenweird2 @AdSappies @AlphabetMafia13 @AriDrennen @JoJoFromJerz You may find this an interesting and educational read. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@Mattsy117 @LaddGiacomo @Nastypouch @Melbourne_lurk @ProfessionalJu2 @Paul_Ilett @TransHomophobes The peer reviewed biology is crystal clear about only two sexes evolving. We know why on two sexes have evolved. You have swallowed a lot of ideological nonse
@FallenX0Angel @HerpEnjoyer @DutchNeoliberal @whanganui61 @KatysCartoons Are you really sure? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@camy_dev @paulmyszor @sbkaufman See the following links for a rebuttal of the 'sex is a spectrum' pseudoscience, along with an insight into the actual science: https://t.co/XxMFR7wVGO https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs https://t.co/f1dxLKGC0k https://t.co/WNDa7u
@DrDFox1 @BadMedicalTakes Have you checked? Because I have and look what I found… https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/OZyf9YT7oL https://t.co/zbdm7ZMma6 https://t.co/HITRnfmZoC
@thieving_misery @SophieTews @OverContentious @cjmarley @BadMedicalTakes By all means, feel free to demonstrate sex has a bimodal distribution with clear methodology. Meanwhile…. https://t.co/ZdB9Nsxe1g
@DuncanCantDie @Unity_MoT @Vox_Oculi @FactsMatterPpl @blaccherrii @Bornakang Again, this paper is about why only two discrete sexes have evolved. What have these world leading biologist got wrong in your opinion? https://t.co/3GsgARCn2E
@DuncanCantDie @Unity_MoT @Vox_Oculi @FactsMatterPpl @blaccherrii @Bornakang The whole "Sex is bimodal" nonsense is a queer theory cornerstone. It is nothing to do with biological science. The actual peer reviewed biology contradicts it. We know only two
@FactsMatterPpl @Vox_Oculi @blaccherrii @Bornakang And once again, the entirety of the peer reviewed biology agrees with me. In fact, it has been a research theme of the last decade or so as to why only two sexes have ever evolved. We understand that now
@E_Chrstnsn @bearshrugged @KathrynTewson @AkivaMCohen @jordanbpeterson "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisoga
@ppeee19 @texan_maga Actual science: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/zvPaAOkVaE
@PlatinumBubble @billonesty @John_outWest @SandmanSlim02 @SarahisCensored This is a very good paper that explains why only two sexes have ever evolved. It has good, clear explanations for the non-expert like you. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@GauteLund2 @Daderp1242389 @SwipeWright And there is nothing "monomaniac' about stating the simple and well established understanding in biology that sex is a strict dichotomy of male and female. We know why that is too. see here, for example... https://t
@BlueBearCharlie @yaboiovenz @atalanta44 @Tommy_Atwell @spikedonline @JamesEsses Well I am happy to be proved wrong. Here is a very good peer reviewed biology paper explaining why only two discrete sexes have ever evolved. Easy to understand explainers f
Here ya go. @thejoelancaster Have a good read, admit your claims about the scientific consensus and scientific literature are wrong and we'll take it from there.
@deuslapis @hallo_stranger @squirellfan @EuphoriTori @AmyBuchananan Are these biologists wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@deuslapis @squirellfan @AmyBuchananan @hallo_stranger @EuphoriTori This is the sort of thing I am after. - peer reviewed papers - by actual research biologists - that describe sex as discrete (as is here) or bimodal. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@muichimotsu @SwipeWright increase for all traits as some are discrete e.g. gamete & gonad types. The graph is PSEUDOSCIENCE. Sexually dimorphic traits like height & muscle mass are certainly bimodal but they're NOT sex itself. Sex is binary, as th
@thejoelancaster @9KnitKnots @iansambo @DJobling @ABCmediawatch Sure there are. Here's one: https://t.co/tJK3Ev5dDh Males and females only. Research biologist publication 2014
@VictorMoraLira1 @hallo_stranger @nbsurprise @TampaIsJason Okay so you still never checked. Nice. Biology of Reproduction by Fusco pg 112. Hine, Robert; Martin, Elizabeth (2015). A Dictionary of Biology. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/OZyf9YT7oL
@PenellopeParfum @AdoraFaerie @hallo_stranger @Burnix_Elf @EuphoriTori Why are these biologists lying? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/hRwK8b0N4U
@AdoraFaerie @hallo_stranger @PenellopeParfum @Burnix_Elf @EuphoriTori Why do you think biologists are wrong? https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o
@khang_nguyen_k @BladeBoriss @Zoe_Brain @KatyMontgomerie You posted an opinion article. There are only two sexes because that's the most evolutionarily stable number in anisogamous species https://t.co/Ro48s9pPhx https://t.co/8gWW8R7BMa
@KrCampbell99 @creg316 @forty9hills @ActivismEnjoyer @cupcakeboner @theserfstv This is literally an advanced reproductive biologu book. This is well known 😂 https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/DW3wpVMGBy
@BillKilvington @robscape @PatrickChristys There's a reason this is an opinion article and not a peer reviewed biology paper. Let me show you the difference: "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes i
@yanbosch @AMBWestside Sure . This is a good paper, written in accessible language, which demonstrates two sexes and explores why only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/fVEhm8MIPL
@XCLover666 @FrancescaElani @navyservant60 It’s not like this is, you know, something you can easily find in biology books and papers…. https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/prx9pfQzc6
@AtlMugiwara @Daderp1242389 @ruin75 @Jakub8632 @EpochTimes OK. There are lots of papers on the evolution of sex. One big puzzle is why only two very different sexes have evolved. We now understand that in detail. This paper is an easy read for the non=expe
@quickhakker @subnorman5 @SimplyKiddy @MrBrexitHanky @loafjungle @misswallison @Serena_Partrick @Sorelle_Arduino @Wickes Here: Only men and women exist. https://t.co/tJK3Ev5dDh Your rebuttal?
@Camio91736713 @GewdWell @hm05677017 @BangyTalks @brokebackUSA What biology actually says: https://t.co/9rwtKAfR8o https://t.co/hsrmJQ2crU
@QueerasaurusLex @DuncanDonut0 @TrudePerkins @MorgothArc @K8T1144 If you ever change your mind, here's a good paper to start with for a layman: https://t.co/i7wWG7xAFX
@SeryphFanfics @For_XXs_Sake @BookBird71 @monsalore Well the whole of peer reviewed biology on the evolution of sex is consistent on this. This is a very good paper as it has easy to read explainers for non-experts like you. https://t.co/lI90SyDhIT
@RaccoonDBoone @TheBeardedFetus @Tomaso2137 @SBD23 @CrawfCol @jordanbpeterson Here is a good one, which is in accessible language. It demonstrates that two sexes have evolved, it also goes on to explain why two and not more. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@08Juan80 But, I asked you for a paper demonstrating sex is bimodal, where is it? Here is a good paper which explores the evolution of two sexes and explains why only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/fVEhm8Mb0d
@Unity_MoT @workercommie @Maskhate @lecanardnoir @EerensMart @WinnowingWind @4Head91637989 @nominalnaomi That's probably because we aren't just talking "within the concept of anisogamy," which also means we aren't talking univocally. And it looks like thos
@Mathenaut @Aaronhn09 @POVyouaremad @PaulHook_em @EndWokeness I’ll ask again: provide a pear reviewed biology article by an actual biologist that statistically demonstrates sex has a bimodal distribution. It’s a consensus, right? So this should be easy. L
@SheenaQuatro @BAsgeirr @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser What’s more funny is you just took a big fat L ☺️ Next time read the thread https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@SheenaQuatro @BAsgeirr @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser “i ReAd tHe tHrEad” https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@BAsgeirr @SheenaQuatro @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser Are you high? I literally cited multiple sources. Why on earth would you not check the thread before declaring I didn’t? 🤦♂️ https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@SheenaQuatro @BAsgeirr @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser To be clear it’s insane tht I said I cited papers when I did? Are you okay? 😂 https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@BAsgeirr @SheenaQuatro @CatDadCommie @DrWitnesser I’m embarrassed for you https://t.co/vJbUn9Ox4b
@Charleyyzard @CzechIreland @speakoutsister This is a peer reviewed biology paper, which is written in accessible language providing a very clear description of the evolution of sex into two discrete categories. It even explains why only two sexes have evo
@EerensMart @workercommie @4Head91637989 @nominalnaomi Are these biologists wrong? Before answering, note they are leading experts on the evolution of sex. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6