| Title |
Metabolic Effects of Late Dinner in Healthy Volunteers—A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JCEM, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1210/clinem/dgaa354 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenjuan Gu, Nga Brereton, Amy Schweitzer, Matthew Cotter, Daisy Duan, Elisabet Børsheim, Robert R Wolfe, Luu V Pham, Vsevolod Y Polotsky, Jonathan C Jun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 553 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 12% |
| India | 30 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 17 | 3% |
| Japan | 16 | 3% |
| Canada | 14 | 3% |
| Russia | 13 | 2% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| Turkey | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 86 | 16% |
| Unknown | 268 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 436 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 66 | 12% |
| Scientists | 43 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 91 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 100 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,105
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#9
of 15,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#459
of 435,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#1
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.