@VonRojas @ValentiaDM @Wifty8 @ablacklady1 @Neasagrey Here is a paper explaining why two - and only two - sexes have evolved. Do feel free to keep looking yourself. *All* biology papers work under the model that there are two and only two sexes. https://
@LastBehaviorist @nzscientists I believe I asked you first, but in the interest of keeping the conversation going: "Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems." https://t.co/O3ic
@TheresaDewa @karolyn_is @nzscientists Ok, let's start with this one then, which defines sex as well as the sexes from a biological perspective: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@kept_simple @joolzzt https://t.co/EoLCM1UeAj This is on the evolution of 2 sexes
@louderthanjoo @AdamDomeij @yaf Here is a paper on how the sexes evolved. The sex of an organism arises directly from gonochorism in anisogamy. This results in two discrete categories - not a spectrum, based on reproductive role. What have these biologi
@BendersShadow1 @mrdarrenyoung @GCSarah2 @ALLIANCELGB @JohnAmaechi @egipam There is if you want to use it as a basis for legislation and restrictions on other people's behavior. "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces t
@heyjohnnathan @GraysenPatriot @AyannaPressley Would you like to look at the peer reviewed biology with me to see what is said there? We can start with how evolution produced two sexes. What have these biologists got wrong in your opinion? https://t.co/3
@GrenMeera @XO83766320 @FiorinoLaurie @ksorbs @soulfoodie Here's a peer reviewed biology paper defining the sexes. Where's your peer reviewed biology paper redefining the sexes? https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@kept_simple @Elizabe36366422 @DuncanHenry78 "the female gamete is non-motile and much larger than the motile male gamete" https://t.co/oNDjWRp1re
@INoahGuy44 @glyonman @RedAcorn2 @davidbadash @TomiLahren @Caitlyn_Jenner I am afraid I do know the science. No peer reviewed biology paper says there are more than two sexes. Here is a very good paper describing how sexes evolved. Note, it says two and
@ramsnappy @SalwoPatrizio @nastyorbit @PrisonPlanet Gametes are fundamental to the concept of sex. Sex evolved from the development of an asymmetry in gamete size. Gametes split into two classes - huge and immobile, very small and motile. This is the evolu
@ramsnappy @SalwoPatrizio @nastyorbit @PrisonPlanet Yes. There are only two categories. Evolution has produced only two categories of sex - defined by gamete type. That is what the biology says, e.g. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@punkybuddy Here is one paper from the peer reviewed biology about the evolution of sex. How many sexes does this paper say have evolved? What do biologists call them? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@SimianSamurai1 @FondOfBeetles @batterystapler @ExtinctionR "Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems." As usual, Emma is correct. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@palmkath @jemimajones68 @a_serious_stan @AnaxLaon @PurlEuclid @AfricaFactsZone "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes in anisogamous systems." https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@AuntHortense @JLSigman By biological definition? Your phenotype of course. "Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems." https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Catheri86341571 The womb is only part of the phenotype, and not exactly the part that produces large gametes. "Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems." https://t.co/O3icoMDYI
@DJInsom @zplerhop @scorpionpunch @Christine2523 @JennaEllisEsq "Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems." https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@jessimae120 @Jaynie413 @ApprtionMission "Biologically, the female sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the larger gametes in anisogamous systems." https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@alc_anthro @MangoJester I'm in the group that uses biological definitions: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@ubiytsa_suka @DizzyBunny10 @DarkWolf_65 @wildeyedluxury @jeonginradiant @OliLondonTV This paper describes the evolution of the two sexes. In the paper a sex is defined with respect to a gamete. What have these biologists got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARB
@sojapojke @rach12sun Sure you are. Might I inquire what that professor's definition of the male sex is exactly? In the mean time: here's an actual peer reviewed biology paper defining sex and the sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@manny_manatee2 @MusoniusRufus @qibliii314 @aitorlorda85 @All_Fem_United @chronic_chels @AbortionChat But here is an actual biology paper that discusses the evolution of sex and why (count them) two evolved. What have they got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgAR
@aitorlorda85 @somescience1 @qibliii314 @lecanardnoir @All_Fem_United @MusoniusRufus @manny_manatee2 @chronic_chels @AbortionChat It's not about people's genitals; it's about their Wolffian or Müllerian reproductive structure: "Biologically, the male sex i
@meffals @archeopsgui @Illumiyoko @fatty_pinner @janeclarejones Yes, and that argument is incorrect. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
Here is the thread. Twitter is hiding it.
@ChaosStar9 @seaxatrois @janeclarejones What do these ‘simpletons’ have wrong and how many sexes do they think have evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ChaosStar9 @seaxatrois @janeclarejones You are incorrect about that. What do these biologists have wrong? They answer my question, do not mention webbed feet, and define what a sex is. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ChaosStar9 @seaxatrois @janeclarejones Maybe not. We can discuss that later too if you wish. I am just surprised you do not want to answer a very simple quesiton. Here is a peer reviewed biology paper on the evolution of sex. What do these ‘simpleton
@starbluv @Peitho70 @Ffuzzyface @RogerPielkeJr Biology doesn't define the male sex by having "male parts". https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@tassadar7945 @_Witch_of_Aeaea @mcfcsaltmine @fairplaywomen @AyoCaesar Circe is correct; infertility has no impact on your biological sex. "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes in anisogamous syste
@FemboyFelicia @diannaeanderson Here is one describing why only two sexes evolved and what we mean by a sex. I am sure you will try your hardest to misconstrue what is being said here. Good luck! https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@AlexaSommers @FrostyBaron @somescience1 @ManOfNoTribes @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 Are you going to admit you are wrong? https://t.co/mV5a6ighI9
@AlexaSommers @FrostyBaron @somescience1 @ManOfNoTribes @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 Please cite any peer reviewed biology paper that supports what you claim. Meanwhile, you have ignored this… https://t.co/mV5a6ighI9
@AlexaSommers @FrostyBaron @somescience1 @ManOfNoTribes @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 You have ignored this… https://t.co/mV5a6ighI9
@AlexaSommers @FrostyBaron @somescience1 @ManOfNoTribes @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 You have ignored this… https://t.co/mV5a6ighI9
@AlexaSommers @FrostyBaron @somescience1 @ManOfNoTribes @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 You have ignored this… https://t.co/mV5a6ighI9
@AlexaSommers @FrostyBaron @somescience1 @ManOfNoTribes @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 This paper shows you are really wrong. Do you want to correct what you have just said? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@mikmilk98 @CultusDaemon We don't disagree about that; I've yet to even see a consistent definition of gender and the genders, while sex in biology is quite simple and binary. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Jaydee_Old_Boy @GGreengage @marcsaunders_82 @piersmorgan @DailyMail Apparently you don't, but let me give you a hand with that: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@AlexaSommers @FrostyBaron @somescience1 @ManOfNoTribes @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 Here is a paper just a few years old talking about how we now think the two sexes evolved. Please read the opening as to how sexes are defined. What have these biologi
@ManOfNoTribes @AlexaSommers @somescience1 @FrostyBaron @ThatNerdyWriter @Bellemoon99 Yes of course. Here is one paper on why two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@transriotgrrrrl @PiraatPedro @Michael07818307 Still the same as before: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@transriotgrrrrl @PiraatPedro @Michael07818307 You're quick with the misogynistic insults, aren't you? https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
Aquí está el artículo antes de que pregunten. https://t.co/noayydVuDI
@DrMoMoGa Bueno, en realidad creo que se confundió mucho y mezcló la gimnasia con la magnesia. El sexo biológico en una especie sí se asigna de acuerdo al tipo de gametos, pero la determinación del sexo biológico en los mamíferos es genética. https://t.co/
@spmcdonnell @graceelavery @Inle_rahbit Sure. The binary nature of sex is a direct result of how evolution works. And evolution of species does not work without it. Are you denying the accuracy and reality of evolution ? Or are you actually a creati
@dynamic_proxy 1) you claim consensus, citing ? 2) I'm not even sure what you want to express here but the existence of the distinction between large and small gametes is not disputed https://t.co/HOXwC3FqOe
RT @lecanardnoir: @KatharineLRS @jeymccreight @23andMe Well in one respect you are correct. There is *no* scientific challenge to the idea…
@PiraatPedro @transriotgrrrrl @Michael07818307 I'm not doing anything other than follow the biological definitions. https://t.co/2qdcHdrI1k
@transriotgrrrrl @PiraatPedro @Michael07818307 It's irrelevant how _I_ define sex; it's important how _biology_ defines sex. https://t.co/2qdcHdrI1k
@transriotgrrrrl @Michael07818307 @PiraatPedro No, you have not. You may not realize what a peer reviewed biology paper looks like, but let me help you with that: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@KatharineLRS @jeymccreight @23andMe Well in one respect you are correct. There is *no* scientific challenge to the idea that sex is a dichotomy. There are papers that research *why* there are just two sexes. But all have to read as if there are two sexes.
@UnluckyWanderer @toorsdenote @snaxodus I don't have a particular point of view; I merely follow the biological definitions: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@JensLilCorner @BSplimby @Zetzys1 @LGBTfdn That doesn't change their biological sex though. "Biologically, the male sex is defined as the adult phenotype that produces the smaller gametes in anisogamous systems." https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@bbrucker2 @ihateshitlibs @georgemct @says_rights @Anarchomancer2 @Solidarity_Star @ProfoundDapper As explained many times before: it's not about how _I_ define anything; it's about how biology defines sex and the sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Moudue_ @NathanielHart72 @BullMooseWhen @Anarchactivist @ElijahSchaffer Pick any peer reviewed biology paper that discusses the nature of sex. Here is one example. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ANeuroDdude @Scenario_2020 Why don’t you find a peer-reviewed source that backs up your assertion that “sex is bimodal” Or perhaps the wording should be “why can’t you find…” https://t.co/KYt5s3kjSY
@khonsu_returns @CozmicKit_ @nativeginger13 @ThatGuy85336408 @UpTheRA03982085 @OrbitTheOrbit @NPC_Samurai @NolifeBob @Trashhcaann @Grace96498430 @sublimner @Magilou51617010 @LSeegurke2 dont let anyone nail you for suggesting its the chromosomes rather than
@ObsrvntPheasant Then you should have no problem presenting a peer reviewed biological paper that claims sex is not binary by a biologist? Of course none exist, because it would fundamentally conflict with the evolution of biological sex. https://t.co/mK
@ShockTwist @23andMeResearch That is a bold claim. We can pick any paper on the biology of sex. Here is one on the evolution of the two sexes. Note how male and female are *precisely* defined by gamete type. Are these biologists bigots? https://t.co/3Gs
RT @Shina20269455: @SimianSamurai1 @psud12 @Mermaids_Gender you're an embarrassment sex is binary https://t.co/zlpLolw7s9 secondary sexu…
@GloriaSenby @rhfrew @BBCNews no, actual peer reviewed scientific texts in biology, not the activist opinion pieces in pop science magazines tras often quote https://t.co/HOXwC3FqOe https://t.co/sJTwywUN07
@FoldUpToys @BBCNews no its not , here some peer reviewed scientific articles in biology and evolutionary biology about that. Sex is throughout the tree of live determined by the gametes. To mix in other physical characteristics is a category error https
@alexandrasaurus @JMXD96 @BBCNews thy are in biology. Linking you to some peer reviewed scientific texts in biology. With good reason. The primary function of sex is procreation and the Gametes are at the center of it https://t.co/HOXwC3FqOe https://t.co/
@SimianSamurai1 @psud12 @Mermaids_Gender you're an embarrassment sex is binary https://t.co/zlpLolw7s9 secondary sexual characteristics shows the variation from which you suggest its a spectrum - but that is not what determines sex #superstraight eve
@tharook @GCSarah2 @apjanes @TheeGuyyyyyyyyy @joehayhurst @liz_gaylor @KatyMontgomerie @Julio_Vichon @MyahaQueenie171 @djmuel_ @ToniWidmo @tfirstelizabeth @firefighter5511 @bindelj All biology papers do - at least implicitly. Here is one that describes w
@DrTr00per Creo que la confusión viene de que los progres no saben lo que es el sexo biológico. De hecho, primero fue la reproducción sexual, después la diferenciación de los gametos, y después competencia intrasexual y dismofismo sexual según la especie h
@MilanLarsen @RadishRuby @Matlin93 @Ketakater @janboehm Aber bitte: "[...] To see this, we must be clear about how the two sexes are defined in a broad sense: males are those individuals that produce the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), while females are defi
@_mimikyus_ @LillithFander https://t.co/L0eNG5vpzC ''Two sexes'' = Binary
@Sinclairitea @FondOfBeetles @AlexAlicit @lord_dopehat @XO83766320 @aryamrosi @KellyTV3 @MillionDollarJC @EmJaRo2 @eastman_lesley @DawnButlerBrent @UKLabour @ClareCAIS @RaeUK We could look at many papers. Here is one example on how and why two - and only
@andrewwestfall4 @Miffinity @Hogtitak @RRaattnniikk @twilightroxas44 @AmrKamalXP @doomboss10 @Jack16_reeves @ApexAlphaJ Evolutions does not ‘make definitions”. It produced anisogamic sexual reproduction with two sexes. This evolved from the runaway creatio
@GodysseyPodcast @SPRunway @madseance @tarasis We could start with a summary of how the two sexes evolved. Note, for this model - which is accepted in biology - to work, you need two - and only two - discrete sexes based around each gamete type. https://t
@alc_anthro @genderisharmful @MalinaMedic @RhywFenyw @SGResisters @wgmin_education No, you are conflating the two. Do you honestly believe a doctor ever looked at the testes of an infertile man, and wondered what gametes they were supposed to produce? As
@ellebe6 @lord_dopehat @michelleetc26 @joules54228823 @emrazz How about you can start by learning how _biology_ defines sex and the sexes, and why. Perhaps _then_ you can understand why people with intersex conditions are just as male or female as you and
@senshi_moone43 @pilenile @TheDuven @crimsonpostgrad @decemberjulian @TeaAyyAreAyy @GallantCapital @carsonp619 Ok, so use this one then: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@jayblanc @pandadearg @ForwomenScot Sex is a reproductive role defined by gamete type. Only two have evolved. Sex is discrete and defined by gametebased function in reproduction. Do say what these biologists have got wrong. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6