RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
RT @zaelefty: This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents…
This peer-reviewed paper has a great overview of this concept, and its discussion about why we only have two sexes represents the large consensus of evolutionary biologists for the last five decades: that gametes are the ultimate definition of sex. https:/
@Jawila03 @alkhaled202020 @Anxiety_Sugarr @adiDallas15 @samsmith @CapitolUK Here is an actual biology paper that can help you on your way. It is about the evolution of two sexes. Not a spectrum of sexes. There is a full glossary at the end if you are stu
@showmethecaucus @ComplainyRainy @MildlyEeevil @philbobagginss @AkilahObviously @jk_rowling Of course - that is trivial. Here is a paper that is one among many that address the question of why two -and only two - sexes have evolved. Are these biologists
@ReganDessert @NeasaLee @Kaliudn Here is a current paper on the evolution of sex. A glossary exists at the end if you get stuck.. Are these biologists wrong and what is their error? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@transferdinand @bread_boy__ @yeahfin @KurapikaASS I fully acknowledge you are trying today that. But you are also very wrong. Let’s look at some actually peer reviewed biology. Here is a paper on the evolution of sex. Are the biologists incorrect hereto
@AcmeAviation @luisbaram A lot of "simple" organisms are hermaphrodites, but even then have eggs and sperm, because it's very useful to have a motile and stationary pair. Here's some material on the evolution of sexual dimorphism on an organism level. http
@EliasNeophytou @ennuiforlife @GSpellchecker Do you think these biologists are wrong in their glossary to define the sexes in relation to gamete types? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@RCownie @_EliHazel @IainFletcher8 @newordermarket @SwipeWright For example, this paper is an attempt to explain the evolution of two discrete sexes: male and female. Full glossary at the end if you are stuck with any big words. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@LoGravityTweets @That_anon_weeB @Tyler44892165 @OrientalLeftism @samemrysartyboi @boogelymoogely @Marxismmmm Well of course biology understands there are two sexes and only two sexes. It is hot topic of evolutionary research as to why there should be exac
@eggynack @VaporwavNashira @Erin_no_Erin @WimpundB @my_real_name It is in the last paper I gave you, There is a full glossary at the end. Also, read the paper. it should become crystal clear. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@eggynack @VaporwavNashira @Erin_no_Erin @WimpundB @my_real_name That would simply be arbitrary, unnecessary and unscientific. And destroy our fundamental understand of what a sex is. If you want to knwo what a sex is, here is a recent paper on how sex e
RT @lecanardnoir: @dunkurtin @Shepard1000 @MrsViolence Let me ask you this: Here is a paper that draws together recent research on how se…
@dunkurtin @Shepard1000 @MrsViolence Let me ask you this: Here is a paper that draws together recent research on how sex evolved. Particularly why there are two discrete sexes. It has a glossary of terms that explain what a sex is. What has it got wrong
@turpywurpy @NathanielHart72 @drawnoutofshape @jean_phoenix_ @FrancisHayden1 Can you find a biology paper (peer reviewed) that characterises what a sex is in your imagined way? Just for starters, here is one on the evolution of sex that defines what a sex
@PetreRaleigh Never? "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)". https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@ThemBread @ThiccZelda @GlennZinny @LumiRueLuv @tedxlondon @n1kk1m Here is one such paper. Please do read. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@galbenedekk @JonathasG4 @fuckhotline @notAfanOfgayPpl @SalafisUnveiled @Khalidalzarouni Peer reviewed biology is quite clear on this definition of what a sex is and research is focussed on explaining how two sexes evolved. e.g. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ElleTrudgett @dev_deets Here is a paper that uses recent modelling to explain why there are two sexes and only two sexes. Does your “model’ have any peer reviewed biology papers modelling to explain what is observed? Nope. I trust you read the paper.
@PinkRangerAnna1 @fashionfwdfello @Emmy_Zje Here is just one example of an actual peer reviewed biology paper that discusses the evolution of the two sexes. A full glossary is supplied. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@TheKarotte @Ghostthatwalks9 @avegansocialist @salltweets You do not understand what a sex is. This is a biology paper on its evolution with a full glossary. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@lilaclizardx @AmiiAmi1 @IndyaMoore That you are or will be a pre-med is quite scary. Are they serving up the ideological kool-aid in science classes these days? Here's a paper that explains how sex evolved. https://t.co/SnwKbhx9Kt
RT @lecanardnoir: @AxelJoh53646950 @Openfordiscuss1 @BlytheGetsCross @notheretobewoke @jk_rowling Read the peer reviewed biology. Here is a…
@AxelJoh53646950 @Openfordiscuss1 @BlytheGetsCross @notheretobewoke @jk_rowling Read the peer reviewed biology. Here is a paper that makes it quite clear about how the *two sexes* evolved. A perfect binary in animals that reproduce through anisogamy. htt
RT @aadiskywalker: @Matt_Clough @Prashasti_19 @zaelefty Claire Ainsworth's article isn't reliable.. https://t.co/erbPpLxTM7
RT @zaelefty: I even have a peer-reviewed source for you! Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the…
RT @zaelefty: I even have a peer-reviewed source for you! Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the…
RT @zaelefty: I even have a peer-reviewed source for you! Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the…
All this effort really to try and debate with a tiny bunch of fetishists supported by a naive bunch of softies who see oppression everywhere. It was the same when the Paedophile Information Exchange was gaining traction with the National Council for Civil
RT @zaelefty: I even have a peer-reviewed source for you! Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the…
I even have a peer-reviewed source for you! Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of two sexes. Molecular Human Reproduction, 20(12). https://t.co/cY877r4NSo
Source: Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of two sexes. Molecular Human Reproduction, 20(12). https://t.co/cY877r4NSo
@MsAwesomeLaurie @gsoshayy @RainerRiver @Cat_believeIT @ChrisDuchovny @jk_rowling We went over this before. You still did not read this paper did you? You did not acknowledge its existence. You are dishonest even asking me this question. https://t.co/3G
@MsAwesomeLaurie @Lulaboo @thetimes Well let’s see if you can engage with an actual science paper. Can you do that? Here is a classic: Lehtonen and Parker. "Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes” https://t.co/3GsgARBPd
Source: [1] Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of two sexes. Molecular Human Reproduction, 20(12). https://t.co/cY877r4NSo
@FarwigMathias @BirkigtA @HasnainKazim @DebbieHayton Und hier etwas zur grundsätzlichen Unterscheidung zwischen Mann und Frau. https://t.co/vqP5Bf0IWy
[Lehtonen, J., Parker, G. (2014). Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of two sexes. Molecular Human Reproduction, 20(12).] https://t.co/cY877r4NSo
@transwolverine @pixeljadeart @RadFemme74 @Quizical15 @LilahSturges "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)
@SteveForgeron This should help you understand Source : https://t.co/fM7KTHgroG I can't keep answering because it's 2:30 am here, but I hope this will give you answers https://t.co/WQm4BR60ir
@code_shock or https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)".
@somethingamyss @Charles80095511 @GellmanRebecca @setoacnna @Ilosia3 @AcreofSnow @Quizical15 @Spunjji or https://t.co/O3icoMVzzO "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female
@cheomitII or https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)".
@AnkersGhost @zaelefty or https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)".
@TheShyWoof @unwitod @ProfessionalJu2 @pingponglaquack @CalumMcSwiggan @intersexfacts @zaelefty @ClareCAIS @RaeUK @FPL_Beer_Club @EndosexD or https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm
@iguana_news @Gerontia @MrsSwift6 @NoraBleeding @madeleinekearns or https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with game
@iguana_news https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)".
@MischaPierce @spikesandspokes @black_bukowski @canthavepudding @doubled3ee @AndrewEBuckley1 @ecocentrism1 @WitchyWeiner @lisahasthots or https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), i
@Quizical15 @magpie839 @ShantiPixie @carolineamorrin @ChristineRiain Perhaps this will help: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@RedFrode @ignaziop1977 @BadAstronomer @fitch_art @RebeccaRHelm Your Wikipedia understanding is hilariously insufficient. This screenshot is so far besides the topic, & even then, doesn't disagree with any of OPs accredited arguments. Also also: nonbi
@KarlesEndeavour @AlexButter1394 @HJJoyceEcon This is a good starting point https://t.co/i4DIEY9gVv
@MalachiteTiger @gildedragon Last reply. If you don't get it after this, I give up https://t.co/tTH7nBjVHu
@FondOfBeetles @lecanardnoir @jonjonedinburgh @PhilippaBrice @AdaMcVean This a reasonable starting point https://t.co/i4DIEY9gVv
@AdaMcVean See, for example, https://t.co/i4DIEY9gVv
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
Why you need any more than 2 sexes. From a logical and evolutionary perspective, it doesn't make any sense.
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
RT @primalpoly: Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe http…
Why are there just two sexes? Biologists review the state of the art in evolutionary theory: https://t.co/geVdxRRNQe https://t.co/Q0Io4QFWq3
RT @transphilosophr: For those interested, here is an article that discusses what many biologists mean when they define the meaning of "mal…
For those interested, here is an article that discusses what many biologists mean when they define the meaning of "male" and "female": https://t.co/SInvXArXW7 It has to do with how sex evolved from its asexual origins.
Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes. http://t.co/7NsGCCs3i8
Jussi Lehtonen és Geoff Parker: Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes: http://t.co/iX5hsIZFyb
Advance Access article from Molecular Human Reproduction on gamete competition and limitation http://t.co/0InMcv8nsK