@Celestial_Emily @theron_amy Perhaos you can write to the biologists in this paper and tell them they are wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Celestial_Emily @theron_amy Well we could pick many. But this one is pretty good as it explains why *exactly* two and only two sexes have evolved in nature. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@CWATC2 @JenniferLahl @SwipeWright Sex in biology is defined by gametes in all anisogamous species, from plants to birds to mammals, including humans. Everything else is derived from that, including the process of determining what sex class someone is a me
@LTfisch @AnComNezuko @MrGoldfish14 @SealNavee @defacatedeficit @nirajj678 @prageru There’s no “my view”; there’s only biology. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@TheresaDewa @lafemmisery @Mjolyyy_ @PomPomQuadSquad @CritLite Perhaps start with this one. It might also help you understand what sex IS: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@BitchetJr @felineholic @BitchetSr Perhaps this will help you understand: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@PinkRangerLyra @Mumford_98 Please enlighten me with a link to a peer reviewed biology paper that defines sex and the sexes in any other way than by gametes. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@BeowulfDay @southernyangers @ConroyTwittier @prageru Well all of peer reviewed biology aligns with this defitnion. Sex is discrete; and comes in precisely two types based on the asymmetry of gametes in oogamy. Here is an example paper on the evolution o
@Bellman63537 @catmaj040 @speakercarroll @laurenboebert No, it most certainly is not, and yes, I know what ISNA wrote over 12 years ago on their now archived website. Our knowledge (and their new website) has evolved a lot since then. https://t.co/O3icoMD
@Mumford_98 I don’t do the defining; I leave that to science, in this case biology: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@TomsAllende2 @KristofferPhilp The common definitions of sex and the two human sexes or a description of how to determine what sex class someone is a member of? https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Tanookicatoon @SwipeWright @ellle_em I cited this paper that describes how biologists define what a sex is. Please do say what these biologists have got wrong. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Tanookicatoon @SwipeWright @ellle_em Challenge accepted. Biologists define what a sex is with respect to reproductive function based on gamete types . Here is a typical paper discussing the evolution of the two sexes. Note no discussion of a spectrum.
@squirrelpatties @QueerSwine @medicguts Well, start with this so you know what sex IS: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@celeste_lumin7 @emaraven11 This may help you out though: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@MoneileenC @redtache @mulligan313 @palladianblue Sex is defined across all anisogamous species, from plants to birds to mammals, including humans. This has to do with evolutionary biology: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@ShapiroTattoo @Scienceofsport @PillarPrepCa @AbigailShrier Its a peer reviewed scientific paper So is this https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@dubioushandle This peer reviewed paper is pretty good that discusses the evolution of the two sexes and our latest thinking on how it arose from gamete competition. Contains a glossary and discussion of meaning of male and female. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd
@MagicalBeaker @thegoodanna_kr @onionsack @CelesteThat @RichardDawkins I will refer you to the peer reviewed biology literature. This paper discusses the evolution of the two sexes and provides a glossary of terms as well as an early definition. https://
@TheSwitchFrog @EasyCringe @HylianApologist @Brubeck51 @MillennialGran7 @EndosexD Perhaps this will help you understand: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Jessiethelion @piramidesbay @ratmily Here’s one. 😀 https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
RT @thsebastiao: FONTES: [1] Lehtonen & Parker, 2014 (https://t.co/skbHnSW6KR) [2] Witchel, 2018 (https://t.co/4MUZAwQ4kn) [3] Gilbert, 201…
RT @thsebastiao: FONTES: [1] Lehtonen & Parker, 2014 (https://t.co/skbHnSW6KR) [2] Witchel, 2018 (https://t.co/4MUZAwQ4kn) [3] Gilbert, 201…
FONTES: [1] Lehtonen & Parker, 2014 (https://t.co/skbHnSW6KR) [2] Witchel, 2018 (https://t.co/4MUZAwQ4kn) [3] Gilbert, 2010, p. 512 (https://t.co/gZO6CG7DdG) [4] Marinov, 2020 (https://t.co/8EhJw0CAGP) [5] Soh, 2020 (https://t.co/RsBcA6yGlh) - https://
And reading the evolutionary and developmental biology literature on sexual reproduction and the two sexes will help. 😁 Start here: https://t.co/cY877r4NSo
@Casper312shy @llegoelbigote_ @apple_got @sharonmoalem "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)". https://t
@MattVBanks @psflaps @Plaindaneaspie You did not back to me on this paper? Are these biologist wrong? PS the literature is not ’scant’. The primary biology literature is monolithic in describing sex as the paper above does. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@MattVBanks @psflaps @Plaindaneaspie … and defined with respect to functional role based on gamete types. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@SatanikRaccoon @hoesneverdie_ @MrPatri50899360 @93MOONCHILD Well maybe it can go somewhere with reference to the actual science? Let’s stick to papers. Here is one on the evolution of the sexes. It says two have evolved and defined by gamete type. Wh
@MattWeiner19 @leakylike @casualavalanche @Klara42226797 @stonewalluk Anyway you want more papers? https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@bgpereira3 @LusciousLarry0 @andwal79 @PiraatPedro @A_KS_ @FelixChaser @elizabeth_loupe @PerrineSabrina @kateb5505 @SebastianPott10 @SoozUK @AidanCTweets @helenstaniland @KatyMontgomerie @alandriscoll Here is a typical biology paper. Note how sex is catego
@noisyb @_del_valle_ @salltweets @ScienceVet2 @zaelefty "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)" https://t.
@Starbird_Tweets @LetruneInedil @JaneDowz Here is a biology paper about the evolution of sex. Note, it is about explaining why there are *only* two sexes and what a sex is. The paper is good too as it has a glossary of important terms. https://t.co/3Gs
@LetruneInedil @JaneDowz Let’s get back to that. We can pick out a few specific conditions and see how they fit in the binary. But first we need to understand the binary, An example here discusses the evolution of the two sexes. It has full defitnions
@joseh_ahmed @wxo2nd You could find this in every biology book on sex development or even wikipedia, but here's a peer reviewed biology paper: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Z0mbieD0g11 @LynxSwedish @feline_charm @RohanTheMajesty @joey_cuppa @UnleashedComedy @marybourkecomic That's karyotypes. Karyotypes aren't sex but they carry the information for sex development. Sex is reproductive categories. https://t.co/T9BKZnnqzP
@ThomasIsDaBomb @SadLittleKobold @AeroBadger @RileyGRoshong Here is another one for you All the best and goodnight https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@lunaeruth @lecanardnoir @lord_dopehat @Katie_WPG @27thCharacter @RileyGRoshong Sure, here’s one: "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species wit
@SadLittleKobold @AeroBadger @RileyGRoshong Where do you think these pseudo beliefs around biological sex you follow come from Malcolm? I mean I am still waiting for you to actual answer my many questions posed to you on sex Here some more science for yo
@RileyGRoshong Lol sources, what sources? Show me a single peer reviewed paper that backs your creationist believes around evolutionary science on biological sex? Here is some real scientific papers https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@EmeryAleksandr @_samanthalux @zaelefty @AlexAlicit @SummerS21651481 @anthony3dh @The_SinOfGreed @VanessaQSC @RileyGRoshong @RaeUK @EndosexD @FondOfBeetles I shall wait your pseudo science papers that counter evolution https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@tallinsmagno "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)". https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Candyflossjin1 @RaeUK @magdalenajanina @DiannaO5t @anyoldirons @applextree @sallyt Well let’s anchor ourselves in the actual primary biology literature. Here is a paper on the evolution of sex. Note how the problem to solve in evolution is why precisely
@DiannaO5t @anyoldirons @applextree @sallyt You will not be able to find a single peer reviewed biology paper that defines sex as being more than two (for organisms like us - oogamic, gonochoric). For example, here is a paper on why evolution has produce
@theworstkirst @Liquidbeans420 @TheHavokgamer @ConceptualJames Perhaps this will help: "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete di
@gerbilpanda @ManFRIDAY_ Here is a paper discussing the evolution of sex. It discusses why there are two sexes and only two sexes - as discrete reproductive roles anchored in each gamete type. Precisely what you say does not exist. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd
@alc_anthro @XO83766320 @devilmeadow @FondOfBeetles Well let’s go to the peer reviewed biology as you appear unfamiliar with it. Let’s start here as a reasonable paper that discusses the evolution of sex and what we mean by a sex? Happy for us to discus
@CleverCasmir @manimalian @psflaps @RaeUK @tibby17 @RiverTham @Ellaschmella @LAURAZILLA100s I also not your second refusal to engage with the actual peer reviewed biology on the nature of sex. This is despite your demands we base this o science. You cover
@CleverCasmir @lord_dopehat @psflaps @RaeUK @tibby17 @RiverTham @Ellaschmella @LAURAZILLA100s I not this morning you did not engage with the actual biology. Here it is again. What have the biologists got wrong here in stating there are two discrete sexes
@CleverCasmir @lord_dopehat @psflaps @RaeUK @tibby17 @RiverTham @Ellaschmella @LAURAZILLA100s If you can find a non-sociology source for that claim in the peer reviewed biology then you have won. Buy the way, you never said what these biologists have got
@CleverCasmir @lord_dopehat @psflaps @RaeUK @tibby17 @RiverTham @Ellaschmella @LAURAZILLA100s Here are some scientists wring about the evolution of sex. They do not mention it is *bimodal* - because that would make no fucking sense. They clearly characteri
@Dr_S_A_Malcolm @Post0821 @PoliticOnDemand @RyanAFournier All that knowledge, and yet you cannot answer a simple question. Let’s see if this refreshes your memory: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@RedMelissa1917 @GianniBoi5 @sable_sonya You are stating something that is simply and obviously false. Here is a biology paper on the nature of sex. Can you see the difference? What have these biologists got wrong saying there are two and only two sexes
@RedMelissa1917 @sable_sonya Well an argument from you would be to cite a peer reviewed biology paper that characterises sex as a bimodal distribution. That would show how biologists think. I can cite papers that show the opposite - like this one on the
@SakuraNoSeirei @emmahn6 @CherylMorgan @AimeeEvelyn202 How about either of you provide some proof of your claims, like: "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes onl
@IsoldeMaisol @mr_amygdala @betweenourveins @AngelFalse_ @cringepolitik You are exactly wrong. *Every* peer reviewed biology paper will agree with this defintion of sex. Only blog posts, opinion articles and nonsense in sociology would go along with your d
@lepradon @Biefell @erlen_zeisig Zur Evolution der beiden Geschlechter https://t.co/UBH4wTsNIC
@MxOolong @Aibagawa @SukyGoodfellow @GreenManjula https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (ani
@fab_schicker @erlen_zeisig @Dr_Konservativ Aber du könntest auch das lesen https://t.co/UBH4wTsNIC
@SukyGoodfellow @Aibagawa @MxOolong @GreenManjula I can’t believe you’re asking for proof of basic biology, but ok: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male a
@ThaBiggestGoose @xKELSOxLIVE @KamB9s @Envymysteeze @hriley408 @KnowN0thing1 @fentyforehead Sure, how about https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg ? "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and fe
@mcsqueeb117 @EObs15 @tamscabulous @mistermissavery @stressedgrill @AdamNa81 @elonmusk @cleantechnica "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species
@realonlyfacts You do not have to trust me. You can check for yourself. Does the peer reviewed biology talk about sex being a spectrum or not? For example, here is a paper on the evolution of two, and only two, sexes. Who do you trust? Your blogger? Or t
@AmandaR82959960 @ArielleScarcell "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with gamete dimorphism (anisogamy)". https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@leftistthot69 @SammySammyStagg @RaeUK @obscure_info @Kaliathane @SylvrewolfeP @TheTomGeorge The trick is to understand how biology defines what a sex is. Biologists define sex with respect to gamete types. See, for example, this paper on the evolution
@antiterfbs @ApplePipped @_loobyloo @PriyamvadaGopal You will not find intersex gametes - that is why you do not find more than two sexes. This paper explains this to you. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6 What do you think they have got wrong?
@antiterfbs @ApplePipped @_loobyloo @PriyamvadaGopal Indeed: two types: (1) huge immobile ones (ova) (2) very small and mobile ones (sperm). That is what evolution has produced. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6 What have these biologists got wrong?
@antiterfbs @ApplePipped @_loobyloo @PriyamvadaGopal MY biology lines up with what the peer reviewed literature says. Here is a typical paper on the evolution of the two sexes. Just two sexes. What have these biologists got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd
@BiCoastalLefty @tamsez @CrazyCancerLady @CC_Wellness7 @HokieCarrie @TheTomGeorge @TulsiGabbard @KITV4 "Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species
@pickinese @AWasserhaus @uuuomo @Kommunikatorin @Jesteresse @konstantkarma @derfreitag Vielleicht fragen Sie sich mal warum sie hier haltlosen wissenschaftlichen Unsinn verbreiten und lesen mal was "gehaltvolles" so wie das hier https://t.co/UBH4wTsNIC
@orbeez4brains @coldfarts420 @uwuawexi @skheptical YOu will not be able to cite any peer reviewed biology paper that describes sex in this manner. You will fid papers though that characterise sex as categorical (male/female) and defined with respect to g
@miniaturefflle @lokiquipped @AceLukeMusic @PeopleofEarth12 @Tenorable @VampMummy @trumpet_kenny “Biologically, males are defined as the sex that produces the smaller gametes (e.g. sperm), implying that the male and female sexes only exist in species with
@El_Leon_Itor @large_shelf @Dank_doge720 @Nathan_Eggers @Bruh82988838 @KnowN0thing1 Well we can pick a peer reviewed biology paper at random that enquires into the nature of sex. This one is good as it goes to some length to ensure it is understood what
@DoomedOne224 @Dank_doge720 @Nathan_Eggers @Bruh82988838 @KnowN0thing1 I could pretty much pick any paper in biology that researches the nature of sex. Here is one that discusses why two sexes have evolved - and only two discrete sexes. What have these
@Dank_doge720 @Nathan_Eggers @Bruh82988838 @KnowN0thing1 @sciam You hold an ideological view of how to define a sex. It is nonsense. Again, this paper describe how biologists define what a sex is. What did they get wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Dank_doge720 @Nathan_Eggers @Bruh82988838 @KnowN0thing1 @sciam Indeed. Let’s have a look at some biology papers. Here is one trying to understand why two and only two sexes evolved in nature. Would you call this a binary? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@tlanequiliztli @SlayersFuture I can walk your hough how they mislead you if you wish. But here is one example biology paper discussion the evolution of there being exactly two sexes. Definitions abound in this paper. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6