"procreation is perfectly possible without this division into two sexes"
@ANeuroDdude @sammyjbray @georgcampbell Well, where shall we start? Let's start with the evolution of the two sexes: male and female. We know in detail why to discrete, functionally defined, sexes have evolved. And only two: https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Nathanblackloc3 @OculiVirides @Pro_Patria2 @rexglacer How sex is defined by gametes, why two and only two sexes have evolved... https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@HoleNotta @lecanardnoir @MSchoderboeck @Darkwaddi @sullivansa1 @BBCWiltshire To a journal called 'Molecular Human Reproduction' and the Universities of Basle & Liverpool - https://t.co/Xd6nphenr2
@NahariStan @KatieInBoston1 @DanDaGuitRMan @DBriggsswed @Edward_TankX @terftheweb @5yearmadness @keffals @hasanthehun That's not what science looks like. This is science: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg?
@bobertohill248 @bimm_r_bimm @linegrinders14 @JoJoFromJerz That's not how biology defines the sexes. XX is not defined as female, and XY is not defined as male. I thought you understood that the sexes are defined by gametes; why then are you arguing that s
@NahariStan @DanDaGuitRMan @DBriggsswed @Edward_TankX @terftheweb @5yearmadness @keffals @hasanthehun It's irrelevant whether they descend or not. This is how biology defines the two sexes. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
RT @AgentSeven2022: Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes | Molecular Human Reproduction | Oxford Acade…
Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes | Molecular Human Reproduction | Oxford Academic https://t.co/vuDXQ4dE4s
@lil_writer @colleen_db @concretexjungle Would you like to look at some peer reviewed biology that defines what a sex is? This is a good one that explains why two discrete sexes have evolved and no more. Definitions included. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
RT @lecanardnoir: We know well now *why* there are just two gamete types, and so two discrete sexes. For hundreds of millions of years of…
RT @lecanardnoir: We know well now *why* there are just two gamete types, and so two discrete sexes. For hundreds of millions of years of…
@wolfs_yawn @MJAL27157258 @antoniabance Absolutely loads sweetie, loads. Let's start with some scientific papers: https://t.co/J3v8PTcLOe https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs https://t.co/H3AkLLGept https://t.co/mscs6VgKq1 Also follow @FondOfBeetles @SwipeWright @
@iamglickmania @ColleenOFlinn @FallingStar_1 @AliSmith269 @GBRChris_A @DrProudman @IndyVoices @Independent Well we could look at pretty much any academic biology paper on sex, but this one is about how the two sexes (male and female) evolved so is quite pe
@NoahFioreSnz @charlesarthur Do we really have to explain biology 101 to you? This is how biology defines the sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@_M_Ard_ @AraucariaArauc1 @RichardDawkins For a more technical presentation, https://t.co/P1P80d4G4v
@Jimw223 @K1tt3n @PVWmkhKH8cvrMQs @LeanneSkarratt8 @guardian_sport @seaningle My point is that no biology journal says sex is "bimodal'. It is *always* described as a a category of male and female. I previously cited this journal to show why biologists b
@steamboat28 @Asheswillfall1 @twhiting9275 @Jimw223 @LeePatekar @alwaysadorecats @Skybreakrgaming @andrew_cuda @FreckledLiberty 1) List of peer reviewed biology papers that say sex is bimodal. ... Male and female are the only sexes that have evolved. Defin
@fractionalgirl @MikeKling9 @dana_mahr1 @hjvoss @ScienceMagazine @UweSteinhoff Und Geschlechtsdefinition über anisogame Gameten ist auch keine „Vereinfachung für den Schulunterricht“, sondern eine sinnvolle und nützliche Definition die selbstverständlich i
@godofbiscuits @CT28114189 @OOmgitskimmie @ALLIANCELGB So i suspect you maybe trolling now, but if you are interested this is a good (& quite accessible paper) on various aspects of sex development. There is ZERO science that point to anything other th
RT @lecanardnoir: @Bec__Bunny @Ce24601Ce @DeonClaiborne @Realitycounts7 @womensmarch Do not rely on what I say. The peer reviewed biology i…
RT @lecanardnoir: @Bec__Bunny @Ce24601Ce @DeonClaiborne @Realitycounts7 @womensmarch Do not rely on what I say. The peer reviewed biology i…
me when i fail to recognise millions of people existing who are neither male nor female biologically and still use a study to regurgitate my viewpoint. You know research is valuable, but what is even more valuable? Having an intersex person completely dism
RT @lecanardnoir: @Bec__Bunny @Ce24601Ce @DeonClaiborne @Realitycounts7 @womensmarch Do not rely on what I say. The peer reviewed biology i…
@Bec__Bunny @Ce24601Ce @DeonClaiborne @Realitycounts7 @womensmarch Do not rely on what I say. The peer reviewed biology is very clear that only two discrete sexes have evolved. For example, this paper explains why. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@UncleBuck666420 @nikk_tastic @CohenMoshico @DodemShagi @twbh204 You don't really need me to explain biology 101 to you, do you? https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@ConanMcKegg @Zoo_Kept @notimelikenow29 @LGBAllianceNZ If you spent a second engaging with the content, instead of attacking the source, you would see lots of references to peer-reviewed science. Here's a good start, and the first one to be quoted in that
@larsweisbrod @mk200120 Und das die sexuelle Selektion bei interner und externer Befruchtung unterschiedlich wirkt. https://t.co/vGRq4QXOAO https://t.co/pQJYQksL1G
@DavelnOz @Basshead_Dub @andrew_b72 @vantablack03 @Fioitwishrh @MForstater @simonrim @j4ppleby Sex is binary and immutable Dave That is basic science https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@PeashamThe4th @sarannadam @spikesandspokes @CharlieXCaine Everything. Biology has no issue whatsoever defining the two sexes, across all anisogamous species. https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@RadiansCorner @Jane66588568 @somenuancepls There is not a single peer reviewed biological paper that claims sex as a spectrum or bimodal Posting a video by a ideological scientist who fails to back his claim up with a single peer reviewed biological pape
@AdennCrane @mizzijpx @quarqij @haukekegler @Warrior_242 @lydiameyer_ Nein. Gemeint ist, was gesagt wird: Nur zwei Geschlechter. Da Biologen wissen, dass gerade die Zweigeschlechtlichkeit evolutionär sowohl grosse innerartliche Variation wie Artenexplosion
@dana_mahr1 @starkwatzinger Klar, gerne. In der Evolutionsbiologie wird das genau so wissenschaftlich genutzt, zB: https://t.co/S6Tp0iQlbV
@screenscholar @huntformagic @jackconservativ @toosquareforme @Mo06224 @kiranm13 @StefWilliams25 @HawleyMO I accept what the peer reviewed biology says. Here is another paper on why two and only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Claire54783043 @ActualLeft @CharlieEC97 Here are actual peer reviewed biological papers https://t.co/mKOZzP5Oi5
@jenniewxrld @SuchAHeather @SDDNOLE @anantadas1997 @BuzzFeed I will encourage you to read any paper on the evolution of “anisogamy”. The idea of male-female is defined by the type of gametes individuals of a species produce. This is a binary. This why I sa
@Alyssa3467 @Awugaaa @ai_action @Esqueer_ And plenty of peer reviewed papers define their terms. Here is one on why two and only two sexes evolved. With definitions. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
RT @zaelefty: @AnneUnfettered @PTElephant @NeuroStaggy @ZombieTron @ByersForKansas @BetteMidler A mainstream evo bio paper on the evolution…
RT @zaelefty: @AnneUnfettered @PTElephant @NeuroStaggy @ZombieTron @ByersForKansas @BetteMidler A mainstream evo bio paper on the evolution…
RT @zaelefty: @AnneUnfettered @PTElephant @NeuroStaggy @ZombieTron @ByersForKansas @BetteMidler A mainstream evo bio paper on the evolution…
@AnneUnfettered @PTElephant @NeuroStaggy @ZombieTron @ByersForKansas @BetteMidler A mainstream evo bio paper on the evolution of the two sexes and why there are only two in almost all multicellular species, by leading experts in the evolution of sex. This
@ZweigDietrich @NichtMrSpock @iLsepupiLse @zeitonline @DIEZEIT Alles schon debunked, aber nice try. https://t.co/bLXo1QQTGK
@TenebrosiErinys @lecanardnoir @Des_Caters @tylikcat @KatyMontgomerie @KatysCartoons I've got a couple of papers here by biologists who appear to have very little difficult in defining your 'impossible to define' question. Perhaps you should give them a r
RT @lecanardnoir: @SNOTFLAN @rainas_world @ColoredPancake @benshapiro ... two and only two sexes have evolved. For example, https://t.co…
@SNOTFLAN @rainas_world @ColoredPancake @benshapiro ... two and only two sexes have evolved. For example, https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6 All this "spectrum" stuff is wild (deliberate) misinterpretation by cranks.
@nmhwilson @Vickste05673925 @DebsNorman @Parallel_Uni @sharrond62 @mile_junkie @KisaLDavis @tyrone_bayliss @NadineDorries @MailOnline @FondOfBeetles @SwipeWright No they don't. Humans are anisogamous. https://t.co/QWf1LbqO6X
@CrepitoGlacies Sorry darling, the science is very much on our side. There are two human sexes, binary and immutable, and no one can be born in the wrong body. https://t.co/54xJirPxPP https://t.co/J3v8PTcLOe https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs
@noAfDHund @dortmann_y @LeiAlexe falls sie doch noch was dazu lesen will, hier ein paar gute wissenschaftliche texte: https://t.co/m3l2c7UzrM
@SlavaUhrina @ZaklinaczLosiow @denyyourtruth @yster9 @laplacetransgrl @SerratedSaint The sexes of male and female are defined with respect to gamete types. The sexes exist *because* of the divergence of gamete types. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@RainBl0wunicorn @BigFakeTech @chron Here is a peer reviewed biology paper on why two and only two sexes have evolved for example. What have these biologists got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@ActivistHat_ @NMAtTheLibrary I've already linked to the scientific papers debunking the 'sex is a spectrum' claim: https://t.co/lVdcHR7k0L All you're doing is playing the tired old #IntersexGambit and misrepresenting other people's medical conditions to
@SSpence64 @NMAtTheLibrary @dumplingdesirer @dani_susanna And sex IS binary. Ironic that you can call yourself a skeptic while believing such pseudoscientific nonsense that has been repeatedly debunked. https://t.co/VbE1NhfnNq
@The_Spider_Arty @sincerely_queer @dani_susanna Present the evidence it isn't. For science confirms firmly the binary nature of sex. https://t.co/DJrBTPy40x https://t.co/J3v8PTcLOe https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs
@AiydenBugg @nlpedwards @astro1095 @Shanghaibuffoon @EDubs7777 @SpikeDanger69 @_nena_cherry @julesprom @russell_nm @realchrisrufo That is a diagram drawn by a non-scientist graphic designer in a pop-sci magazine. It is not a peer reviewed source and is des
@AiydenBugg @nlpedwards @astro1095 @Shanghaibuffoon @EDubs7777 @SpikeDanger69 @_nena_cherry @julesprom @russell_nm @realchrisrufo A source that has no credibility. Here is a peer reviewed biology paper that explains why two, and only two, discrete sexes
@BienscheMaja @GwenhwyfarMunin @linuslissel @piyaii @Sim_Bar63 @RiglingMatthias @ronja_beck bitte, danke und jetzt raus hier, schönen abend noch. https://t.co/m3l2c7UzrM
@Ap_Saegge "Viele verschiedene" was hervorgebracht? Natürlich ist es ein Optimierungsproblem. Dieses Paper beschreibt das. Lesen Sie einfach mal: https://t.co/tIok8sFrLb
@behemothhh Sie meinen so etwas zum Beispiel? https://t.co/tIok8sFrLb
@AshleyTorrin @Ambers_teard @LunaEllisUK @davidhattonbook To give you an example of what such a thing looks like: https://t.co/O3icoMDYIg
@Tushar001Singh @hfoster505 @HarlotPrincessx @CAISFiles @XO83766320 @Iamthisnotthat1 @RaeUK @IntersexTruther @KatieInBoston1 @DaysGoByGoBy Lovely. Here's the science for you. Enjoy. https://t.co/J3v8PTcLOe https://t.co/b6Ip6hERMs https://t.co/NkgB2wGksK
@ravielie @drdredel @hiimargo This is a very good paper which describes why two discrete papers have evolves - and only two sexes. What have these biologists got wrong in your opinion? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@WatcherWoe @HandOfTheDark @AnnabelTheRose @chadfelixg A sex is an evolved reproductive role associate with one of the two gamete types. The gamete types evolved divergently and do not overlap. This is the source of their being two sexes, e.g. see… https:
@j3lkz @Jtm0401 @Aizensama1987 @EminaMelonic @JustinFolk @MattWalshBlog @realDailyWire @davereaboi What have these biologists got wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@nytelife26 @DeliaArribas @Frollino95 @Gender_WooWoo @brain_gilgamesh @BachtoBach2 @keffals Woman = adult female human Man = adult male human As for the definition of the male and female sexes: https://t.co/O3icoMVzzO
@CloudVolumesGuy @SeethiFC @cacheblaster @aofl96 @everydayangst1 @david55034076 @jasonintrator Your question contains a confusion, which I can address shortly. But first, here is a paper that explains why two and only two sexes have evolved and why it ha
RT @lecanardnoir: @scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @qsilverfox @GCBeeGee @iseult @Dervheid I am not aware of you actually defining what a…
@scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @qsilverfox @GCBeeGee @iseult @Dervheid I am not aware of you actually defining what a sex is yet. And nor have you said what is wrong with these biologists definitions and explanations as to why only to have evolved. ht
RT @lecanardnoir: @scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @IBrasso @Dervheid This is an interesting paper on why two - and only two - sexes have…
@scienceandbears @DaytimePubSmell @IBrasso @Dervheid This is an interesting paper on why two - and only two - sexes have evolved. Are they wrong? Have more sexes evolved? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@Hanky__Spam @Kitab_al_Azif So wie .@NeuroStaggy zusammenstellt zum Beispiel: https://t.co/R4RSQZe9PS Oder sowas: https://t.co/tIok8sFrLb
@xk992x @STEVEN_HALL_bTC @MrThou6 @GhostGcom I just have. We can look at the peer reviewed biology to back up what I say. As you can see here, this paper shows *why* only two sexes have evolved (it is very evolutionary stable) and that male and female are
RT @zaelefty: This evolutionary biology paper on the evolution of two sexes, by Lehtonen & Parker, is the gold standard for explaining why…
@Blow_The_Trap Was it this point? https://t.co/Y85ds5szAi In that case, here is a paper describing why two and only two sexes have evolved. https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@JustinFREAKINS My sources are the peer reviewed research literature on the evolution of sex. You refuse to engage with the literature when asked if you think the biologists are wrong? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@JustinFREAKINS Do you think these biologist are wrong that only two sexes have evolved based on the two different gamete types? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@JustinFREAKINS Do you disagree with these biologists that only two sexes have evolved based on the two gamete types? https://t.co/3GsgARBPd6
@JustinFREAKINS Sex is defined with respect to gamete types. It is discrete. This is foundational biology. To argue anything else requires some very explicit argument. You cannto show this. Here is just one paper that explains why only two sexes have evo
@KaylinStuff @TheRavey @FondOfBeetles Could you please link me to some of these papers? Biological study demonstrates the firm binary nature of sex. https://t.co/b6Ip6hFpC0 https://t.co/J3v8PTdjDM
@hydropsyche1 @kayleigh_elt @AlphavilleXpres @celestelabedz @NSF Biologists don't make foolish statements about sex being a spectrum. Biologists don't conflate the spectrum of sex characteristics with the binary of sex. https://t.co/HHnlggsj3o
@WhatIsAWomanBot @Ashe2120 @SerbSwordsman @Libtard2022 @pierbii @MattWalshBlog The z axis is biological sex, which is defined by reference to the organisation of phenotypes in normal development around the production of one of two types of gamete, i.e. ani
@alexandrasaurus @NolanEP84 @Lisa0101010101 @jessiegender Science does exist. Words also matter for communication. Trolling means intentionally making inane comments so you can argue online for hours. We all understand what the definition means, and we kno